1,721,247 research outputs found

    Tariq Modood en de erkenning van het religieuze verschil

    No full text
    Recensie van: Tariq Modood (2010) Still not easy being British. Struggles for a multicultural citizenship. Stoke on Trent, Sterling: Trentham Books, Runnymede Trust, 164 p.Recensie van: Tariq Modood (2010) Still not easy being British. Struggles for a multicultural citizenship. Stoke on Trent, Sterling: Trentham Books, Runnymede Trust, 164 p

    Is multiculturalism dead?

    No full text
    Multiculturalism has been subject to overwhelming criticism in the last decade or so. Tariq Modood asks, is it finally time to abandon the idea? Copyright (c) 2008 The Author. Journal compilation (c) 2008 ippr.

    Geoffrey Brahm Levey, Tariq Modood (éd.), Secularism, Religion and Multicultural Citizenship, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 2009

    No full text
    Bastian Jean-Pierre. Geoffrey Brahm Levey, Tariq Modood (éd.), Secularism, Religion and Multicultural Citizenship, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 2009. In: Revue d'histoire et de philosophie religieuses, 91e année n°2, Avril-Juin 2011. pp. 242-243

    A left communitarianism? What about multiculturalism?

    No full text
    A more plural approach can help to heal breaches both within the ‘multicultural community’ and beyond. Tariq Modood and Jan Dobbernack argue that an inclusive multiculturalism can be a learning experience for the centre left.</p

    A left communitarianism? What about multiculturalism?

    No full text
    A more plural approach can help to heal breaches both within the ‘multicultural community’ and beyond. Tariq Modood and Jan Dobbernack argue that an inclusive multiculturalism can be a learning experience for the centre left.</p

    Interview: Tariq Modood – on being a public intellectual, a Muslim and a multiculturalist

    No full text
    In an interview for Renewal with Simon Thompson, Tariq Modood, one of Britain’s foremost Muslim public intellectuals, discusses the role of the public intellectual, Islam and British public life, and a critically evolving multiculturalism. You can read the full interview for free, online here. In this extract Modood discusses the impact of the Salman Rushdie affair of 1989 on his politics

    #LSEreligionLecture: “We need to re-imagine understandings of the British identity” – Tariq Modood

    No full text
    In October, Tariq Modood gave a lecture at LSE entitled Equality for Secular Belief and Minority Faiths? Reflections on the Commission on Religion in British Public Life as part of LSE’s Religion and the Public sphere lecture series. Here, Afiqah Binti Zainal reviews the event

    Accepting multiple differences: the challenge of double accommodation

    No full text
    Drawing on the British case, Tariq Modood and Jan Dobbernack consider the relationship between two modes of ‘difference’, multiculturalism and multiculture. Multiculture is concerned with moments of contact, the hybridization of culture and the creation of social and cultural spaces that allow for effortless encounters. Multiculturalism refers to claims, not least by Muslims, for equal respect and for the accommodation of their difference in the public sphere. The chapter illustrates ways in which these two modes have been seen to be in conflict. It argues that the plurality of minority claims for acceptance requires a pluralized normative and conceptual vocabulary and a way of thinking non-antagonistically about ‘multiple differences’</p

    The Translocation of Culture: Migration, Community, and the Force of Multiculturalism in History

    Full text link
    In his work on a Welsh border village, Ronald Frankenberg showed how cultural performances, from football to carnival, conferred agency on local actors and framed local conflicts. The present article extends these themes. It responds to invocations by politicians and policy makers of ‘community cohesion’ and the failure of communal leadership, following riots by young South Asians in northern British towns. Against the critique of self-segregating isolationism, the article traces the historical process of Pakistani migration and settlement in Britain, to argue that the dislocations and relocations of transnational migration generate two paradoxes of culture. The first is that in order to sink roots in a new country, transnational migrants in the modern world begin by setting themselves culturally and socially apart. They form encapsulated ‘communities’. Second, that within such communities culture can be conceived of as conflictual, open, hybridising and fluid, while nevertheless having a sentimental and morally compelling force. This stems from the fact, I propose, that culture is embodied in ritual and social exchange and performance, conferring agency and empowering different social actors: religious and secular, men, women and youth. Hence, against both defenders and critics of multiculturalism as a political and philosophical theory of social justice, the final part of the article argues for the need to theorise multiculturalism in history. In this view, rather than being fixed by liberal or socialist universal philosophical principles, multicultural citizenship must be grasped as changing and dialogical, inventive and responsive, a negotiated political order. The British Muslim diasporic struggle for recognition in the context of local racism and world international crises exemplifies this process. Classification-

    Accepting multiple differences: the challenge of double accommodation

    No full text
    Drawing on the British case, Tariq Modood and Jan Dobbernack consider the relationship between two modes of ‘difference’, multiculturalism and multiculture. Multiculture is concerned with moments of contact, the hybridization of culture and the creation of social and cultural spaces that allow for effortless encounters. Multiculturalism refers to claims, not least by Muslims, for equal respect and for the accommodation of their difference in the public sphere. The chapter illustrates ways in which these two modes have been seen to be in conflict. It argues that the plurality of minority claims for acceptance requires a pluralized normative and conceptual vocabulary and a way of thinking non-antagonistically about ‘multiple differences’</p
    corecore