1,722,601 research outputs found
Tao Xingzhi ge qu. I
No full textSide A. 1. 捧著一顆心來不帶半根草去(一)(二) ; 2. 在我的世界里小孩青年最大 ; 3. 一群小好漢(一)(二) ; 4. 追悼慈母歌 ; 5. 梅香苦 ; 6. 三代 ; 7. 朝陽歌 ; 8. 小庄晓 ; 9. 问江 ; 10. 诗的学校 ; 11. 紀念牛頓与伽利略 ; 12. 拉車 ; 13. 马克思颂 ; 14. 跟青年學 ; 15. 歌唱现代 ; 16. 寂寞 ; 17. 爱国歌 ; 18. 科学的春天 ; 19. 小小徽机真灵巧 ; 20. 玩科学把戏真有趣 ; 21. 水姑娘午曲 -- Side B. 1. 大哉陶子 ; 2. 哭陶先生 ; 3. 我是中国人 ; 4. 國民與我 ; 5. 人民教师我爱你 ; 6. 我们的青春常在 ; 7. 千教万教教人求真, 千学万学学做真人 ; 8. 我要看看世界 ; 9. 今天 ; 10. 少年 ; 11. 我的小怀抱 ; 12. 看荷花舞 ; 13. 人的体操 ; 14. 问到底 ; 15. 立大志, 求大智, 做大事 ; 16. 团结御侮文体 ; 17. 民之所好三首 ; 18. 诗人节祝词 ; 19. 只道早还乡 ; 20. 好了歌 ; 21. 中国小孩子过新年 ; 22. 教师歌 ; 23. 忠心之歌 ; 24. 我爱有趣的谈天会 (未录完).陶城曲 ; 陶城演唱 ; 杜鳴心, 陳貽鑫, 巫漪丽鋼琴演奏.Possibly reproduced from other commercial recording or radio broadcast (Pending for review)"如蘭, 學鐄教授惠存: 陶城, 陳樹新贈, 1988.8.26"--Side A.Electronic reproduction from Rulan Chao Pian Audio Cassette Collection.Composer : 陶城.Singer : 陶城 ; Piano : 杜鳴心, 陳貽鑫, 巫漪丽.Sung in Chinese.Tao Cheng qu ; Tao Cheng yan chang ; Du Mingxin, Chen Yixin, Wu Yili gang qin yan zou."Rulan, Xuehuang jiao shou hui cun: Tao Cheng, Chen Shuxin zeng, 1988.8.26"--Side A.Composer, Tao Cheng.Singer: Tao Cheng ; Piano: Du Mingxin, Chen Yixin, Wu Yili.Detailed contents in vernacular field only
Retracted: Optimization of E‐commerce platform marketing method and comment recognition model based on deep learning and intelligent blockchain
No full textAbstract Retraction: [Tao Cheng, Lianjiang Li, Optimization of E‐commerce platform marketing method and comment recognition model based on deep learning and intelligent blockchain, IET Software 2023 (https://doi.org/10.1049/sfw2.12117)]. The above article from IET Software, published online on 3 February 2023 in Wiley Online Library (wileyonlinelibrary.com), has been retracted by agreement between the Editor‐in‐Chief, Hana Chockler, the Institution of Engineering and Technology (the IET) and John Wiley and Sons Ltd. This article was published as part of a Guest Edited special issue. Following an investigation, the IET and the journal have determined that the article was not reviewed in line with the journal’s peer review standards and there is evidence that the peer review process of the special issue underwent systematic manipulation. Accordingly, we cannot vouch for the integrity or reliability of the content. As such we have taken the decision to retract the article. The authors have been informed of the decision to retract
Supplementary_TablesR2 – Supplemental material for Constructive, illusory, and distressed posttraumatic growth among survivors of breast cancer: A 7-year growth trajectory study
No full textSupplemental material, Supplementary_TablesR2 for Constructive, illusory, and distressed posttraumatic growth among survivors of breast cancer: A 7-year growth trajectory study by Chih-Tao Cheng, Samuel MY Ho, Yi-Chen Hou, Yihuan Lai and Ging-Long Wang in Journal of Health Psychology</p
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
Full text linkThe present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
Variations on the Author
Full text link“Variations on the Author” discusses two of Eduardo Coutinho’s recent films (Um Dia na Vida, from 2010, and Últimas Conversas, posthumously released in 2015) and their contribution to the general question of documentary authorship. The director’s filmography is characterized by a consistent yet self-effacing form of authorial self-inscription: Coutinho often features as an interviewer that rather than express opinions propels discourses; an interviewer that is good at listening. This mode of self-inscription characterizes him as an author who is not expressive but who is nonetheless markedly present on the screen. In Um Dia na Vida, however, Coutinho is completely absent form the image, while Últimas Conversas, on the contrary, includes a confessional prologue that moves the director from the margins to the center of his films. This article examines the ways in which these works stand out in the filmography of a director who offers new insights into the notion of cinematic authorship
Appropriate Similarity Measures for Author Cocitation Analysis
Full text linkWe provide a number of new insights into the methodological discussion about author cocitation analysis. We first argue that the use of the Pearson correlation for measuring the similarity between authors’ cocitation profiles is not very satisfactory. We then discuss what kind of similarity measures may be used as an alternative to the Pearson correlation. We consider three similarity measures in particular. One is the well-known cosine. The other two similarity measures have not been used before in the bibliometric literature. Finally, we show by means of an example that our findings have a high practical relevance.information science;Pearson correlation;cosine;similarity measure;author cocitation analysis
Dispelling the Myths Behind First-author Citation Counts
Full text linkWe conducted a full-scale evaluative citation analysis study of scholars in the XML research field to explore just how different from each other author rankings resulting from different citation counting methods actually are, and to demonstrate the capability of emerging data and tools on the Web in supporting more realistic citation counting methods. Our results contest some common arguments for the continued
use of first-author citation counts in the evaluation of scholars, such as high correlations between author rankings by first-author citation counts and other citation
counting methods, and high costs of using more realistic citation counting methods that are not well-supported by the ISI databases. It is argued that increasingly available digital full text research papers make it possible for citation analysis studies to go beyond what the ISI databases have directly supported and to employ more
sophisticated methods
- …
