186,189 research outputs found
Integrated damage detection and time-series data augmentation for floating offshore mooring systems via variational semi-supervised learning
No full textThe dynamics and stability of the semi-submersible offshore platforms are significantly impacted by the degradation of the mooring system. Identifying structural integrity issues in mooring systems through a data-driven approach is challenging due to the infrequency of damage events and the difficulties in recording them. To address these challenges, this study proposes the Time-Series Variational Semi-Supervised Learning (TSVSSL) framework, which effectively bridges the gap between supervised and unsupervised learning by leveraging unlabelled data for damage detection. The proposed framework features a distinctive training procedure in which the encoder-decoder and classifier components are trained concurrently. This process produces a well-clustered latent representation that enhances damage detection and supports class-specific artificial data generation. A numerical study using simulated responses of a 5 MW semi-submersible FOWT under varying metocean conditions demonstrated that the proposed framework outperformed existing deep learning methods in damage detection, achieving superior accuracy, precision, recall, and F1 score. Further, a rejection sampling technique is also introduced to effectively generate artificial data that closely aligns with actual time series displacement response. The novelty of the proposed framework lies in its dual focus on damage detection and artificial data generation marking a significant advancement in the data-driven assessment of mooring systems
Machine learning based conformal predictors for uncertainty-aware compressive strength estimation of concrete
No full textEstimating concrete compressive strength is crucial for accurately predicting its performance, optimising material usage, and ensuring the durability and safety of the structure. Traditional machine learning (ML) models have primarily focused on deterministic predictions of compressive strength, often overlooking the uncertainty associated with these estimates. However, concrete is a non-homogeneous material with complex and variable behaviour, making it inherently difficult to predict compressive strength with precision. Therefore, incorporating uncertainty into predictive modelling is essential for producing more reliable and practical results in real-world engineering applications. This study addresses this gap by proposing a comprehensive framework for uncertainty quantification in concrete strength estimation using conformal prediction methods. In this comprehensive study, eight distinct machine learning models are systematically integrated with six conformal prediction variants to construct statistically rigorous prediction intervals. To evaluate the performance of the models holistically in engineering contexts, a novel Efficiency Score (ES) is proposed, combining empirical coverage, mean interval width, and point prediction accuracy. The findings reveal notable trade-offs between predicted interval width and empirical coverage across the model spectrum. Among the tested combinations, LightGBM coupled with Jackknife+ emerges as the most effective configuration, demonstrating the highest efficiency score. Additionally, conformal predictors exhibit satisfactory adaptation to heteroscedasticity, which arises in the predictions of higher-grade concrete (>40 MPa). Thus, the proposed framework empowers more informed decision-making in concrete design and quality control by providing robust uncertainty bounds advancing beyond traditional deterministic point predictions to support risk-aware infrastructure development
Author-wise bibliometric analysis based on entropy.
No full textAuthor-wise bibliometric analysis based on entropy.</p
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
No full textThe present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
Appropriate Similarity Measures for Author Cocitation Analysis
No full textWe provide a number of new insights into the methodological discussion about author cocitation analysis. We first argue that the use of the Pearson correlation for measuring the similarity between authors’ cocitation profiles is not very satisfactory. We then discuss what kind of similarity measures may be used as an alternative to the Pearson correlation. We consider three similarity measures in particular. One is the well-known cosine. The other two similarity measures have not been used before in the bibliometric literature. Finally, we show by means of an example that our findings have a high practical relevance.information science;Pearson correlation;cosine;similarity measure;author cocitation analysis
Dispelling the Myths Behind First-author Citation Counts
No full textWe conducted a full-scale evaluative citation analysis study of scholars in the XML research field to explore just how different from each other author rankings resulting from different citation counting methods actually are, and to demonstrate the capability of emerging data and tools on the Web in supporting more realistic citation counting methods. Our results contest some common arguments for the continued
use of first-author citation counts in the evaluation of scholars, such as high correlations between author rankings by first-author citation counts and other citation
counting methods, and high costs of using more realistic citation counting methods that are not well-supported by the ISI databases. It is argued that increasingly available digital full text research papers make it possible for citation analysis studies to go beyond what the ISI databases have directly supported and to employ more
sophisticated methods
Dr. Edward P. Wimberly, ITC, July 2011
No full textThis video is a conversation with Dr. Edward P. Wimberly. Dr. Wimberly talks about his book, "No Shame in Wesley's Gospel: A Twenty-First Century Pastoral Gospel". Brad Ost, AUC Woodruff Library, is the interviewer
Author Rights and Scholarly Publishing
No full textOriginally posted at
http://blog.library.gsu.edu/2014/10/24/author-rights-and-scholarly-publishing/</p
Mapping the Discipline of the Olympic Games An Author-Cocitation Analysis
No full textThe authors conducted an author cocitation analysis on prominent authors writing about the Olympics during the 1990s. Author cocitation is an established bibliometric technique that can be used to measure the relative similarities of topics written about by the cited authors. This enables a visual representation of the “intellectual space” of the discipline, in this case the Olympics, to be created for the period under review. So core and peripheral research areas are identified, along with their major contributors. The representation appears as a two-dimensional cluster-enhanced map. Subject expertise was then applied to the results to place labels on the generated clusters of authors and their topics
- …
