1,721,188 research outputs found
Non-invasive glucose monitoring: Assessment of technologies and devices according to quantitative criteria
No full textAbstract
Aim of this review was to describe the main technologies for non-invasive glucose monitoring and the corresponding most relevant devices. The review tries to overcome the limitations of previous reviews on this topic, such as the lack of objective criteria for inclusion or exclusion of technologies or devices, and the poor organization of the information, which often does not allow easy comparison between technologies and devices. In this review, the information is concise and organized into specific categories, and hence it becomes easy to compare advantages and disadvantages of the different technologies and devices. For technologies, the categories of information considered are the technology name, the underlying physical principle, the technology limitations and the measurement sites on the human body. For devices, the categories of information are the device name, its approval condition (FDA Approval and/or CE Mark), the technology on which it is based, a device general description, the tests performed on the device, the corresponding results, safety information, aspects affecting usability, current status of the device and the manufacturer, an Internet reference for the device. A total of 14 technologies and 16 devices are included. Conclusions of the review were that, despite some interesting and promising technologies and devices, a satisfactory solution to the non-invasive glucose monitoring problem still requires further efforts
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
Full text linkThe present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
Variations on the Author
Full text link“Variations on the Author” discusses two of Eduardo Coutinho’s recent films (Um Dia na Vida, from 2010, and Últimas Conversas, posthumously released in 2015) and their contribution to the general question of documentary authorship. The director’s filmography is characterized by a consistent yet self-effacing form of authorial self-inscription: Coutinho often features as an interviewer that rather than express opinions propels discourses; an interviewer that is good at listening. This mode of self-inscription characterizes him as an author who is not expressive but who is nonetheless markedly present on the screen. In Um Dia na Vida, however, Coutinho is completely absent form the image, while Últimas Conversas, on the contrary, includes a confessional prologue that moves the director from the margins to the center of his films. This article examines the ways in which these works stand out in the filmography of a director who offers new insights into the notion of cinematic authorship
Appropriate Similarity Measures for Author Cocitation Analysis
Full text linkWe provide a number of new insights into the methodological discussion about author cocitation analysis. We first argue that the use of the Pearson correlation for measuring the similarity between authors’ cocitation profiles is not very satisfactory. We then discuss what kind of similarity measures may be used as an alternative to the Pearson correlation. We consider three similarity measures in particular. One is the well-known cosine. The other two similarity measures have not been used before in the bibliometric literature. Finally, we show by means of an example that our findings have a high practical relevance.information science;Pearson correlation;cosine;similarity measure;author cocitation analysis
Comparison of software packages for the analysis of continuous glucose monitoring data
No full textThe use of Continuous Glucose Monitoring (CGM) systems in the management of diabetes is rapidly growing and represents an eligible technology to overcome the limitations of self-monitoring of blood glucose. However, not complete standardization of the CGM data analyses methodologies is limiting the potential of these devices. In the last few years, different software solutions have been proposed to find a common pattern for making CGM data analysis results more interpretable and reproducible. The aim of this study was to compare two of the newest open-source software packages available for CGM data analysis, GLU and iglu. To perform the comparison, CGM data of 9 subjects with type 1 diabetes coming from the open D1NAMO dataset have been analyzed with both software. Metrics available both in GLU and iglu have been compared, namely: Area Under the Curve (AUC), Time Above Range (TAR), Time Below Range (TBR), Time in Range (TIR) and Mean Absolute Deviation (MAD). Mean values for GLU and iglu were: AUC (170 ± 23 vs. 165 ± 27 mg•dl-1); TAR (40 ± 17 vs. 38 ± 21 %); TBR (6 ± 7 % in both); TIR (54 ± 18 vs. 60 ± 21 %), MAD (43 ± 20 vs. 67 ± 28 mg•dl-1). Only MAD was found statistically different between GLU and iglu. In conclusion, this comparison provided an overview of the graphical and computational aspects in CGM analysis provided by GLU and iglu software packages, which could be useful to researchers and clinicians to find a transparent and consistent way of interpreting CGM data
Mathematical model of glucagon kinetics during an oral glucose tolerance test based on a dual regulation mechanism
No full textGlucagon is a hormone secreted by the pancreatic alpha cells and plays a key role in glucose homeostasis and in the pathophysiology of type 2 diabetes (T2D). Different mechanisms are involved in its regulation, but exact mechanisms are still largely unknown. This study aimed to propose a model describing glucagon inhibition during an oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT), accounting for a double regulation mechanism. The model has been developed starting from a model previously proposed by our group that includes two differential equations, one for plasma glucagon and one for C-peptide (marker of insulin at pancreatic level). In the new model, in addition to plasma C-peptide, plasma glucose is included as model input. The model provides two parameters of possible clinical relevance, namely SGLUCA and kG (alpha-cell insulin and glucose sensitivity, respectively) and has been validated on mean literature data of healthy subjects and subjects affected by T2D (CNT and T2D, respectively). Model analysis yielded SGLUCA estimates ranging from -0.1515 to 0.7629 and from -5.5602 to 1.1067 (ng of glucagon·nmol of C-peptide-1) in CNT and T2D groups, respectively; according to the 95% confidence intervals (CIs), SGLUCA was significantly different from zero in 4 and in 0 out of 8 time points, in CNT and T2D. Estimates for kG were equal to 2.8302 (95% CIs: 1.1973-4.4632) and 0.9913 (95% CIs: -0.5559-2.5386) ng of glucagon·mmol of glucose-1. Thus, results suggest both insulin (represented by C-peptide) and glucose significantly contributes to glucagon inhibition in healthy subjects, but not in T2D. In conclusion, the proposed model may help to describe different mechanisms acting on glucagon inhibition in the single individuals
Dispelling the Myths Behind First-author Citation Counts
Full text linkWe conducted a full-scale evaluative citation analysis study of scholars in the XML research field to explore just how different from each other author rankings resulting from different citation counting methods actually are, and to demonstrate the capability of emerging data and tools on the Web in supporting more realistic citation counting methods. Our results contest some common arguments for the continued
use of first-author citation counts in the evaluation of scholars, such as high correlations between author rankings by first-author citation counts and other citation
counting methods, and high costs of using more realistic citation counting methods that are not well-supported by the ISI databases. It is argued that increasingly available digital full text research papers make it possible for citation analysis studies to go beyond what the ISI databases have directly supported and to employ more
sophisticated methods
- …
