1,721,229 research outputs found
Performance of imaging modalities in diagnosis of liver metastases from colorectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis
No full textJ Magn Reson Imaging. 2010 Jan;31(1):19-31.
Performance of imaging modalities in diagnosis of liver metastases from colorectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Floriani I, Torri V, Rulli E, Garavaglia D, Compagnoni A, Salvolini L, Giovagnoni A.
Source
Department of Oncology, Istituto di Ricerche Farmacologiche "Mario Negri", Milan, Italy. [email protected]
Abstract
Surgery of liver metastases can be effective, and the appropriate selection of surgical candidates relies first on imaging. Different techniques are available, but information on their relative performance is unclear. The aim of this overview is to assess the imaging modality performance in the diagnosis of colorectal cancer (CRC) liver metastases. MEDLINE and EMBASE were searched for articles published from January 2000 to August 2008. Eligible trials had to be conducted on patients with diagnosis/suspicion of CRC liver metastases, comparing more than two modalities among MRI, computed tomography (CT), positron emission tomography using fluoro-18-deoxyglucose (FDG-PET), ultrasonography (US). Pooled estimates of sensitivity, specificity were calculated and pair-wise comparisons were performed. Of 6030 screened articles, 25 were eligible. Sensitivity and specificity on a per-patient basis for US, CT, MRI, and FDG-PET were 63.0% and 97.6%, 74.8% and 95.6%, 81.1% and 97.2, and 93.8% and 98.7%, respectively. On a per-lesion basis, sensitivity was 86.3%, 82.6%, 86.3%, and 86.0%, respectively. Specificity was reported in few studies. MRI showed a better sensitivity than CT in per-patient (odds ratio [OR]: 0.69; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.47-0.99; P = 0.05) and in per-lesion analysis (OR: 0.66; 95% CI: 0.55-0.80; P < 0.0001). In per-lesion analysis, the difference was higher when liver-specific contrast agents were administered. Available evidence supports the MRI use for the detection of CRC liver metastases.
(c) 2009 Wiley-Liss, Inc.
PMID:
20027569
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLIN
Early stage ovarian cancer: the Italian contribution to clinical research. An update
No full textEarly ovarian cancer (stages IA-IIA) accounts for 30% of all epithelial ovarian cancer. Even if relatively uncommon, when "high risk" patients are considered, it is lethal in 25-30% of the cases. Mainstay of treatment is surgery followed by either adjuvant chemotherapy or radiotherapy when indicated on the basis of still debatable prognostic factors. Literature data show a great variability in survival rate due to the great heterogeneity of patients considered in different reports and few randomized trials affected by a consequent low power. Italian groups have contributed both in investigating the role of surgery and of chemo or radiotherapy in the treatment of this disease. An important contribution in surgery has been made by Italian institutions in reducing the extent of surgery in young patients wishing to retain their reproductive capability showing that a "conservative surgery" (unilateral oophorectomy) can be safely performed in initial stages without affecting the probability of cure. Another important surgical topic investigated by Italian institutions concerns the role of lymphadenectomy. In early ovarian cancer the node involvement ranges between 14-24% in stage I and 37-50% in stage II. Although the node positivity rate detectable by sampling (SA) is lower than the one shown by a systematic procedure (LY), no data at the moment show that patients undergoing a sampling evaluation have a poorer prognosis. From 1992 through 1994, 202 patients (SA: 99; LY: 103) were enrolled by six Italian institutions in a randomized trial aimed to assess the diagnostic and therapeutic role of SA vs. LY in early stage ovarian cancer. Positive nodes were detected in 9.9% vs. 19.3% respectively as well as a different proportion of intra/perioperative complications occurred. No difference in time to relapse nor in overall survival were detected in the two groups showing no evidence of efficacy in favor of extensive staging of the retroperitoneum. From 1983 to 1990, 271 stage I ovarian cancer patients entered two prospective multicentric randomized trials conducted by Italian institutions. Trial I compared cisplatin (50 mg/m2, six cycles repeated every 28 days) vs. no further treatment in stage IA-B grade 2-3 patients; Trial II compared the same dose and schedule of cisplatin vs. intraperitoneal P32 in stage IC patients. Cisplatin significantly reduced the relapse rate by 65% in Trial I and by 61% in Trial II, but survival was not affected (Trial I: HR = 1.15, 95% CI = 0.44-2.98; Trial II: HR = 0.72, 95% CI = 0.37-1.43). The final conclusion drawn by these two important Italian studies was that adjuvant cisplatin treatment in early ovarian cancer prevents relapse although the impact of chemotherapy remains unclear. For this reason two international trials have been performed (ICON1 and ACTION) aimed at assessing the role of platinum-based chemotherapy on survival. Italian collaboration in both trials has been important, including about half of the total number of the 900 randomized patients. Results will probably be available during this year and are expected with a great interest by the whole scientific international community
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
Full text linkThe present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
Variations on the Author
Full text link“Variations on the Author” discusses two of Eduardo Coutinho’s recent films (Um Dia na Vida, from 2010, and Últimas Conversas, posthumously released in 2015) and their contribution to the general question of documentary authorship. The director’s filmography is characterized by a consistent yet self-effacing form of authorial self-inscription: Coutinho often features as an interviewer that rather than express opinions propels discourses; an interviewer that is good at listening. This mode of self-inscription characterizes him as an author who is not expressive but who is nonetheless markedly present on the screen. In Um Dia na Vida, however, Coutinho is completely absent form the image, while Últimas Conversas, on the contrary, includes a confessional prologue that moves the director from the margins to the center of his films. This article examines the ways in which these works stand out in the filmography of a director who offers new insights into the notion of cinematic authorship
Appropriate Similarity Measures for Author Cocitation Analysis
Full text linkWe provide a number of new insights into the methodological discussion about author cocitation analysis. We first argue that the use of the Pearson correlation for measuring the similarity between authors’ cocitation profiles is not very satisfactory. We then discuss what kind of similarity measures may be used as an alternative to the Pearson correlation. We consider three similarity measures in particular. One is the well-known cosine. The other two similarity measures have not been used before in the bibliometric literature. Finally, we show by means of an example that our findings have a high practical relevance.information science;Pearson correlation;cosine;similarity measure;author cocitation analysis
Dispelling the Myths Behind First-author Citation Counts
Full text linkWe conducted a full-scale evaluative citation analysis study of scholars in the XML research field to explore just how different from each other author rankings resulting from different citation counting methods actually are, and to demonstrate the capability of emerging data and tools on the Web in supporting more realistic citation counting methods. Our results contest some common arguments for the continued
use of first-author citation counts in the evaluation of scholars, such as high correlations between author rankings by first-author citation counts and other citation
counting methods, and high costs of using more realistic citation counting methods that are not well-supported by the ISI databases. It is argued that increasingly available digital full text research papers make it possible for citation analysis studies to go beyond what the ISI databases have directly supported and to employ more
sophisticated methods
koamabayili/VECTRON-author-checklist: VECTRON author checklist
No full textWe have done our best to complete the author checklist relating to the use of animals in the hut study. Note that the objective for the hut study was to evaluate the IRS treatment applications for residual efficacy against Anopheles mosquitoes, including the local An. coluzzii mosquito population. Cows were only used to attract mosquitoes into the huts and no tests were carried out directly on the cows. The author checklist is intended for use with studies where experiments are carried out on animals, which is why we have had such difficulty in completing this for the hut study, as many of the questions do not relate to how the cows were used
- …
