111,842 research outputs found
STRESS LAVORO-CORRELATO - IDONEITA’ AL LAVORO: PROPOSTA DI UN METODO OLISTICO NELL’APPROCCIO ALLA VALUTAZIONE DELLA CAPACITA’ LAVORATIVA.
No full text
Liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry method as the golden standard for therapeutic drug monitoring in renal transplant
No full textDe novo homozygous mutation of the C1 inhibitor gene in a patient with hereditary angioedema
No full textauthor-bios-SRD-19-0063.R1 – Supplemental material for The Network Structure of Police Misconduct
No full textSupplemental material, author-bios-SRD-19-0063.R1 for The Network Structure of Police Misconduct by George Wood, Daria Roithmayr and Andrew V. Papachristos in Socius</p
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
Get PDFThe present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
More on: factor V Leiden and prothrombin G20210A polymorphisms as risk factors for miscarriage during a first-intended pregnancy: the matched case-control 'NOHA first' study.
No full text
- …
