1,720,976 research outputs found

    The project-weather climate and hydrological indicators Istat

    No full text
    The present paper illustrates the National Institute of Statistics (Istat) research project entitled "Meteo-climatic and hydrologic indicators" carried out in 2008. Since 1926, Istat disseminates meteorological data collected from gauging stations located over the whole Italian territory. The aims of this project (included in the National Statistical Program 2008-2010 and conducted with the partnership of Cra-Cma) are to implement a geographic data-warehouse with meteorological and hydrological daily values measured since 1951 from the stations of both national (i.e. Mipaaf, Smam, Apat) and regional (e.g. rural development agencies, research institutes) services. Based on the results of statistical data collecting, checking and imputation of lacking values, the data-warehouse will allow to estimate the main climate variables at high spatial resolution. Finally, a set of indicators regarding the interaction of climate with biological, agronomic, pedological and hydrological themes will be estimated, through down-scaling approaches, at administrative spatial scales (e.g. municipalities, local labour systems, agricultural homogeneous regions) in order to achieve integration with other statistical (e.g. socio-economic) variables obtained at that scale

    Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis

    Full text link
    The present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
    corecore