1,721,293 research outputs found
First record of the Nephropid genus Acanthacaris Bate, 1888 (Crustacea: Decapoda: Nephropidae) from Taiwan
No full textChang, Su-Ching, Wang, Teng-Wei, Chan, Tin-Yam (2015): First record of the Nephropid genus Acanthacaris Bate, 1888 (Crustacea: Decapoda: Nephropidae) from Taiwan. Zootaxa 4032 (5): 595-599, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4032.5.
First records of Lithodes longispina Sakai, 1971 (Crustacea: Decapoda: Anomura: Lithodidae) from southwestern Taiwan, including a site in the vicinity of a cold seep
No full textWang, Teng-Wei, Ahyong, Shane T., Chan, Tin-Yam (2016): First records of Lithodes longispina Sakai, 1971 (Crustacea: Decapoda: Anomura: Lithodidae) from southwestern Taiwan, including a site in the vicinity of a cold seep. Zootaxa 4066 (2): 173-176, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4066.2.
FIGURE 2. Acanthacaris tenuimana Bate, 1888 in First record of the Nephropid genus Acanthacaris Bate, 1888 (Crustacea: Decapoda: Nephropidae) from Taiwan
No full textFIGURE 2. Acanthacaris tenuimana Bate, 1888, southwestern Taiwan, 1290–1300 m, male cl 125.0 mm, (NTOU M01873). A, anterior carapace and appendages, dorsal view; B, left major cheliped (tip slightly broken), mesial view. Scale bars: 3 cm.Published as part of Chang, Su-Ching, Wang, Teng-Wei & Chan, Tin-Yam, 2015, First record of the Nephropid genus Acanthacaris Bate, 1888 (Crustacea: Decapoda: Nephropidae) from Taiwan, pp. 595-599 in Zootaxa 4032 (5) on page 598, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4032.5.8, http://zenodo.org/record/23746
Roundtable : Alternative theories and practices = 圓桌討論 : 另類理論與實踐
No full textOn 26th July 2016, at SSFS 3, Muto Ichiyo, Darwis Khudori, Teng Wei, and Lau Kin Chi joined this session of roundtable. The roundtable was mainly about alternative theories. A pre-recorded speech by Samir Amin and Wen Tiejun was aired, followed by presentations of various speakers. This roundtable session was moderated by Ip Iam Chong
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
Get PDFThe present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
- …
