1,720,981 research outputs found
Human prolyl-hydroxylase (hPH): Only a marker of hepatic damage?
No full textBACKGROUND: We examined two proteins, prolylhydroxylase (hPH) and procollagen type III (PIIIP), as possible non-invasive HCV-related markers of liver disease. The purpose of this study was to assess whether the measurement of these proteins could serve to monitor HCV related liver damage in acute lymphoblastic leukaemia (ALL) patients.
PROCEDURE: A total of 34 ALL patients, 24 HCV-seropositive and 10 HCV-seronegative, who had had increased transaminase values (ALT) for almost 6 months were studied. Serum hPH concentrations were determined by an immuno-enzymatic assay kit. PIIIP was assayed by the radioimmunoassay method.
RESULTS: Both hPH and PIIIP were increased in ALL patients with chronic hepatitis C. Serum hPH levels were significantly elevated in those with chronic hepatitis C with either normal or high transaminases when compared to those who never were HCV seropositive. The sensitivity and specificity of these protein measurements to evaluate hepatic fibrosis were not supported by histologic confirmation because only 6 out of 12 patients with chronic hepatitis had a liver biopsy.
CONCLUSIONS: Our study suggests that PIIIP and hPH values are significantly higher in ALL patients with chronic HCV with either normal or high transaminases. This might suggest that the liver damage is more marked in patients with chronic hepatitis and that the liver damage is related to the HCV rather than chemotherapy. Future studies correlating histologic findings with the serum biochemical markers are required to establish the sensitivity and specificity of hPH and PIIIP in predicting hepatic fibrosis and to confirm this association
Methotrexate therapy and liver fibrosis: are human prolyl hydroxylase and type IV collagen reliable and sensitive markers?
No full textN/
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
Full text linkThe present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
Variations on the Author
Full text link“Variations on the Author” discusses two of Eduardo Coutinho’s recent films (Um Dia na Vida, from 2010, and Últimas Conversas, posthumously released in 2015) and their contribution to the general question of documentary authorship. The director’s filmography is characterized by a consistent yet self-effacing form of authorial self-inscription: Coutinho often features as an interviewer that rather than express opinions propels discourses; an interviewer that is good at listening. This mode of self-inscription characterizes him as an author who is not expressive but who is nonetheless markedly present on the screen. In Um Dia na Vida, however, Coutinho is completely absent form the image, while Últimas Conversas, on the contrary, includes a confessional prologue that moves the director from the margins to the center of his films. This article examines the ways in which these works stand out in the filmography of a director who offers new insights into the notion of cinematic authorship
Appropriate Similarity Measures for Author Cocitation Analysis
Full text linkWe provide a number of new insights into the methodological discussion about author cocitation analysis. We first argue that the use of the Pearson correlation for measuring the similarity between authors’ cocitation profiles is not very satisfactory. We then discuss what kind of similarity measures may be used as an alternative to the Pearson correlation. We consider three similarity measures in particular. One is the well-known cosine. The other two similarity measures have not been used before in the bibliometric literature. Finally, we show by means of an example that our findings have a high practical relevance.information science;Pearson correlation;cosine;similarity measure;author cocitation analysis
- …
