1,725,923 research outputs found

    Heteronomy of architecture: Un Dialogo di/A Dialogue of Matteo Ruta con/with Benedetta Tagliabue

    No full text
    I’m not calling today about the competition we are holding for Reinventing Cities here in Lambrate - I am calling to ask you if you would like it if we had a dialogue together on the Heteronomy of Architecture. Benedetta Tagliabue: Hello Matteo! Don’t even talk about it, everything is so sad. You know just how important it is for me to travel and meet people all the time... in person. Dialogue? Absolutely! But... what is this “heteronomy”? You don’t mean it’s something that excludes someone? You know I don’t like it... M.R. Come on, we’ve known each other for years! Look, it’s exactly the opposite. A very interesting concept which Giancarlo De Carlo summed up well in a sentence I am going to read to you. «As you can tell as you listen, one cannot help but think of your way of knowing, investigating and reading the places and cities in which you design. It is also impossible not to think of how you live together with others, and how this has always been the way you live architecture on a daily basis, and how you know how to transmit it and build it together with all the people you meet: collaborators, citizens, users, clients, politicians, artists, producers of materials, craftsmen, friends, etc. [...]». B.T. Oh well... I was actually joking a bit, you know it amuses me. I remembered this idea of Giancarlo’s from when I was studying at the Faculty of Architecture in Venice, and I was struck by his strength and energy in knowing how to interpret it at its best and translate it into splendid practice on many occasions. Thank you also for your kind words, it was so kind of you to have thought of me. It certainly is an interesting theme to delve into in a monographic issue of a magazine, and I would like to congratulate those who thought of it. So... Yes, I like it: let’s dialogue! You already know that we’ll have to talk again a few times. M.R. Of course I know... it’s always a great pleasure

    18. Sessió 5. Els projectes que no vam construir / Benedetta Tagliabue

    No full text
    Conferència de Benedetta Tagliabue, Arquitecte i sòcia de la firma EMBT des de 1992, per a la sessió 5. Arquitectura: la institucionalització d'una poètica

    18. Sessió 5. Els projectes que no vam construir / Benedetta Tagliabue

    No full text
    Conferència de Benedetta Tagliabue, Arquitecte i sòcia de la firma EMBT des de 1992, per a la sessió 5. Arquitectura: la institucionalització d'una poètica

    Output associated with Tagliabue et al. Importance of authigenic phases in governing upper ocean iron cycle dynamics

    No full text
    Output associated with Tagliabue et al. Importance of authigenic phases in governing upper ocean iron cycle dynamic

    Chan Tagliabue Interviewed by Irene Burgess and Bruce Gentry

    Full text link
    Irene Burgess and Bruce Gentry interview Chan Tagliabue, who grew up in Milledgeville, GA, and received her BA in English and French from the Women’s College of Georgia in 1964.https://kb.gcsu.edu/collectingthepast/1022/thumbnail.jp

    Interview Benedetta Tagliabue

    Full text link
    Benedetta Tagliabue studied architecture at the Istituto di Architettura di Venezia (IUAV) and currently acts as director of the international architecture firm Miralles Tagliabue EMBT, founded in 1994 in collaboration with Enric Miralles, based in Barcelona, Shanghai and Paris

    Who/What Helps Me to Become An Adult? The Role of Family Factors, Romantic Relationship and Job Involvement

    No full text
    During the transition to adulthood the emerging adults face a variety of challenges in different life domains (Roisman, Masten, Coatsworth, Tellegen, 2004; Schulenberg, Schoon, 2012). On one side, family relationships constitutes the safety net which allows emerging adults to explore the others life domains such as romantic relationship and job context. On the other side, both romantic relationship and job are crucial domains to assume adult role (Seiffge-Krenke, Luyckx , Salmela-Aro, 2013). Indeed, being involved in a significant romantic relationship helps emerging adults to think about their own future family, whereas being employed give the possibility to become economically independent, one of the criteria used to define adult status (Arnett, 2000). The aim of the study is to analyze how the different domains affect the: future plans regarding adulthood and the financial strain. Previous studies have underlined how the romantic relationship allows emerging adults to think about his/her future as an independent person with an own family (Lanz, Tagliabue, 2007). Moreover the financial well being resulted positively affected by family relationships only in some phase of the transition to adulthood (Lanz, Tagliabue, 2014). In the previous studies the different domains are in general considered independently without considering the interactions between them. Moreover, the studies involved only emerging adults without considering the perception of father and mother. In this study we used a multiple informants strategies to obtain dyadic data concerning parent-child relationship. The sample is composed by 177 family triads (composed by emerging adult, mother, and father). All the emerging adults live with their parents; 48.6% were males; 37.9% are workers; 54.2% were involved in a romantic relationship. Findings showed that emerging adults that have a job and a romantic relationships perceived a less financial stress and thought that will be more likelihood to have a family and children in the next five years. Moreover they reported less likelihood to be unemployed. The quality of parent-child relationships reported by emerging adults was not related to financial strain, but it was related to future plans. Structure equation model will be performed to test the influence of different domains on future concern and financial strain

    Romantic relationships during emerging and early adulthood: how do graduation and marriage affect romantic relationship quality

    No full text
    Romantic relationship partners encounter numerous events along their relationship development. In addition, the transition to adulthood is marked by many life events for emerging adult partners (finishing school, entering the job market, leaving the parental home, etc.). Obtaining one’s Master degree is a normative and individual event, because it is expected and it involves one partner of the relationship. It is the first step in the process that will end up with the entrance in the job market and the acquisition of financial independence from one’s parents (Arnett, 2000). Marriage usually happens towards the end of emerging adulthood in Italy and reflects the ability to take care of a new family and of children, criteria that stand at the top for adulthood, especially in Mediterranean countries (Crocetti & Tagliabue, 2016). Marriage is also a normative event, but, unlike graduation, is a shared, dyadic event that involves both partners. The aim of this research was to examine whether and how those two normative events affect partners’ romantic relationship. Two longitudinal samples were collected. The first was composed of 149 emerging adults in a stable romantic relationship that filled in a questionnaire just before and around 10 months after graduation. Second, questionnaire data were collected from 114 early adult couples 6 months before and 12 months after marriage. We will compare emerging adult and engaged partners’ romantic relationship quality and functioning before and after graduation as well as before and after marriage. Analyses are in progress
    corecore