1,721,055 research outputs found

    Interaction between vision and neck proprioception in the control of stance

    No full text
    Balance control depends on the interaction of multiple inputs originating from different sensory systems. Here, we investigated the effect on quiet human stance of changing the visual condition prior to a proprioceptive perturbation produced by vibration of dorsal neck muscles. In complete absence of visual references, the amplitude of the postural responses to neck vibration (forward shift of the centre of foot pressure) was the largest and became progressively larger as a function of the repetition of administered stimuli. The posture-destabilizing effect of vibration eyes-closed (EC) and the build-up effect were reduced if vibration was preceded by a period during which vision was allowed (EO). Similarly, the small destabilizing effect of vibration EO was increased if vibration was preceded by an EC period. The fore-period must last more than 3 s in order to affect the response to neck muscle vibration. The responsiveness to a proprioceptive disturbing input does not immediately change on adding or subtracting vision, but a finite time period must elapse before the postural “set” defined by vision is fully established. The findings underline the importance of time when vision is used in re-weighting the excitability of the postural control mechanisms

    Interaction between vision and neck proprioception in the control of stance

    No full text
    Balance control depends on the interaction of multiple inputs originating from different sensory systems. Here, we investigated the effect on quiet human stance of changing the visual condition prior to a proprioceptive perturbation produced by vibration of dorsal neck muscles. In complete absence of visual references, the amplitude of the postural responses to neck vibration (forward shift of the centre of foot pressure) was the largest and became progressively larger as a function of the repetition of administered stimuli. The posture-destabilizing effect of vibration eyes-closed (EC) and the build-up effect were reduced if vibration was preceded by a period during which vision was allowed (EO). Similarly, the small destabilizing effect of vibration EO was increased if vibration was preceded by an EC period. The fore-period must last more than 3 s in order to affect the response to neck muscle vibration. The responsiveness to a proprioceptive disturbing input does not immediately change on adding or subtracting vision, but a finite time period must elapse before the postural “set” defined by vision is fully established. The findings underline the importance of time when vision is used in re-weighting the excitability of the postural control mechanisms

    Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis

    Full text link
    The present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
    corecore