179,523 research outputs found
Hubungan Rokok Terhadap Motivasi Belajarmahasiswa Pendidikan Agama Islamuniversitas Islam Negeri Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta
No full textTujuan dari penelitian ini adalah untuk mengetahui hubungan merokok
dengan motivasi belajar mahasiswa PAI UIN Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta.
Kebiasaan merokok pada mahasiswa merupakan sebuah kebiasaan yang
diciptakan sendiri, sehingga kebiasaan inilah yang sulit dilepaskan dan
ditinggalkan oleh mahasiswa perokok aktif.
Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah deskriptif kuantitatif yang dalam
pelaksanaannya dilakukan penelitian lapangan dengan cara menyebar angket
kepada beberapa responden serta observasi di kampus UIN Syarif Hidayatullah
Jakarta.
Adapun hasil penelitian yang menunjukkan bahwa antara hubungan
merokok terhadap motivasi belajar mahasiswa PAI UIN Syarif Hidayatullah
Jakarta menunjukkan tidak adanya hubungan yang signifikan dengan hasil
perhitungan yang menunjukkan r hitung< r tabel(r hitung 0, 164 <r tabel 5% = 0, 388 / r
hitung 0, 164 <r tabel1% = 0, 496) yang artinya r hitung lebih kecil (0, 164) dari r
tabel5% (0, 388) dan r tabel1% (0, 496). Maka hasil akhir yang diperoleh adalah
bahwa hubungan antara merokok dengan motivasi belajar mahasiswa PAI UIN
Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta tidak terdapat korelasi yang positif yakni tidak
terdapat hubungan yang signifikan.
Dengan demikian dapat disimpulkan bahwa tidak terdapat hubungan yang
signifikan antara merokok dengan motivasi belajar mahasiswa PAI UIN Syarif
Hidayatullah Jakarta
Pengaruh Fasilitas Kerja Terhadap Kinerja Pengelola Perpustakaan Di Lingkungan Uin Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta
No full textTujuan dilakukannya penelitian ini yaitu; (1) untuk mengetahui kondisi fasilitas kerja perpustakaan di lingkungan UIN Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta, (2) untuk mengetahui kinerja pengelola perpustakaan di lingkungan UIN Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta, (3) untuk mengetahui pengaruh fasilitas kerja secara parsial terhadap kinerja pengelola perpustakaan di lingkungan UIN Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta, dan (4) untuk mengetahui seberapa besar pengaruh fasilitas kerja terhadap kinerja pengelola perpustakaan di lingkungan UIN Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian asosiatif, dengan pendekatan kuantitatif. Teknik pengambilan sampel yang digunakan yaitu total sampling, jumlah sampel dalam penelitian ini sama dengan jumlah populasi yaitu berjumlah 49 orang pengelola perpustakaan di lingkungan UIN Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta. Hasil penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa; (1) kondisi fasilitas kerja perpustakaan di lingkungan UIN Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta, dalam hal ini pada indikator gedung, ruang, dan sarana ialah sudah baik, dengan skor 3,25. (2) kinerja pengelola perpustakaan di lingkungan UIN Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta, dalam hal ini pada indikator kuantitas output, kualitas output, ketepatan waktu, kehadiran, dan kemampuan bekerja sama ialah sudah sangat baik, dengan skor 3,30. (3) berdasarkan hasil uji parsial (uji t) yang telah dilakukan, menunjukkan bahwa nilai signifikansi (Sig.) ttabel yaitu 5,340 > 2,012. Maka dapat dibuktikan bahwa variabel fasilitas kerja (X) berpengaruh secara parsial dan signifikan terhadap variabel kinerja pengelola perpustakaan (Y) di lingkungan UIN Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta, dan (4) berdasarkan hasil uji determinasi (R Square), menunjukkan bahwa nilai koefisien determinasi (R Square) sebesar 0,378 (37,8%). Hal ini memiliki arti bahwa, variabel fasilitas kerja (X) berpengaruh secara simultan (bersama-sama) terhadap variabel kinerja pengelola perpustakaan (Y) yaitu sebesar 37,8% (0,378) sedangkan sisanya (100% - 37,8% = 62,1%) dipengaruhi oleh faktor lain yang tidak diteliti dalam penelitian ini.xi, 113 hlm, 25 c
Pengaruh Fasilitas Kerja Terhadap Kinerja Pengelola Perpustakaan Di Lingkungan Uin Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta
No full textTujuan dilakukannya penelitian ini yaitu; (1) untuk mengetahui kondisi fasilitas kerja perpustakaan di lingkungan UIN Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta, (2) untuk mengetahui kinerja pengelola perpustakaan di lingkungan UIN Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta, (3) untuk mengetahui pengaruh fasilitas kerja secara parsial terhadap kinerja pengelola perpustakaan di lingkungan UIN Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta, dan (4) untuk mengetahui seberapa besar pengaruh fasilitas kerja terhadap kinerja pengelola perpustakaan di lingkungan UIN Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian asosiatif, dengan pendekatan kuantitatif. Teknik pengambilan sampel yang digunakan yaitu total sampling, jumlah sampel dalam penelitian ini sama dengan jumlah populasi yaitu berjumlah 49 orang pengelola perpustakaan di lingkungan UIN Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta. Hasil penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa; (1) kondisi fasilitas kerja perpustakaan di lingkungan UIN Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta, dalam hal ini pada indikator gedung, ruang, dan sarana ialah sudah baik, dengan skor 3,25. (2) kinerja pengelola perpustakaan di lingkungan UIN Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta, dalam hal ini pada indikator kuantitas output, kualitas output, ketepatan waktu, kehadiran, dan kemampuan bekerja sama ialah sudah sangat baik, dengan skor 3,30. (3) berdasarkan hasil uji parsial (uji t) yang telah dilakukan, menunjukkan bahwa nilai signifikansi (Sig.) ttabel yaitu 5,340 > 2,012. Maka dapat dibuktikan bahwa variabel fasilitas kerja (X) berpengaruh secara parsial dan signifikan terhadap variabel kinerja pengelola perpustakaan (Y) di lingkungan UIN Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta, dan (4) berdasarkan hasil uji determinasi (R Square), menunjukkan bahwa nilai koefisien determinasi (R Square) sebesar 0,378 (37,8%). Hal ini memiliki arti bahwa, variabel fasilitas kerja (X) berpengaruh secara simultan (bersama-sama) terhadap variabel kinerja pengelola perpustakaan (Y) yaitu sebesar 37,8% (0,378) sedangkan sisanya (100% - 37,8% = 62,1%) dipengaruhi oleh faktor lain yang tidak diteliti dalam penelitian ini.xi, 113 hlm, 25 c
Pengaruh self esteem dan religiusitas terhadap body image pada mahasiswi UIN Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta
No full textPenelitian ini menunjukkan bagaimana pengaruh dari dimensi self-esteem (performance, social, and appearance) dan religiusitas (public practice, private practice, religious experience, ideology and intellectual) terhadap body image pada mahasiswi UIN Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta. Sampel sebanyak 302 mahasiswi usia 17-24 tahun. Metode yang digunakan yaitu analisis regresi berganda. Hasil penelitian mengindikasikan bahwa terdapat pengaruh yang signifikan dari dimensi self-esteem dan body image pada mahasiswi UIN Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta (R-Square = .504, sig = 0.000)
Appropriate Similarity Measures for Author Cocitation Analysis
No full textWe provide a number of new insights into the methodological discussion about author cocitation analysis. We first argue that the use of the Pearson correlation for measuring the similarity between authors’ cocitation profiles is not very satisfactory. We then discuss what kind of similarity measures may be used as an alternative to the Pearson correlation. We consider three similarity measures in particular. One is the well-known cosine. The other two similarity measures have not been used before in the bibliometric literature. Finally, we show by means of an example that our findings have a high practical relevance.information science;Pearson correlation;cosine;similarity measure;author cocitation analysis
Analisis Faktor-Faktor Yang Mempengaruhi Mahasiswa Untuk Berwirausaha (Studi Kasus Mahasiswa Agribisnis UIN Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta)
No full textWirausaha merupakan potensi pembangunan, baik dalam jumlah maupun
dalam mutu wirausaha itu sendiri. Indonesia menghadapi realitas bahwa jumlah
wirausahawan masih sedikit, yaitu sekitar 1,65% (Sumber: Berita Kementrian
Koperasi dan Usaha Kecil dan Menengah, Maret 2015), sedangkan dibutuhkan
setidaknya 2% wirausahawan untuk dapat menjadi Negara yang makmur.
Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk (1) mengetahui karakteristik mahasiswa
Agribisnis UIN Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta yang pernah berwirausaha (2)
menganalisis faktor-faktor apa saja yang mempengaruhi mahasiswa Agribisnis
UIN Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta untuk berwirausaha.
Penelitian ini dilakukan dengan memasukkan tiga faktor yang
mempengaruhi suatu tindakan (Theory of Planned Behavior) yang
diimplementasikan sebagai faktor yang mempengaruhi tindakan berwirausaha;
yakni sikap dan perilaku (attitude), norma subjektif, dan kontrol diri. Metode yang
digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah metode kuantitatif. Pengumpulan data
dalam penelitian ini melalui kuesioner. Populasi penelitian ini adalah mahasiswa
Agribisnis UIN Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta angkatan 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, dan
2012. Pengambilan sampel menggunakan proportionate stratified random
sampling sebanyak 80 responden.
Nilai R square dalam penelitian ini sebesar 0.412, menunjukkan bahwa
41,2% Mahasiswa berwirausaha dapat dijelaskan oleh variabel bebas yang
digunakan dalam model yaitu sikap dan perilaku, norma subjektif, dan kontrol
diri. Sedangkan sisanya 58,8% dijelaskan oleh variabel lain di luar model
penelitian ini. Hasil perhitungan secara simultan variabel sikap dan perilaku
(attitude), norma subjektif, dan kontrol diri mendorong mahasiswa untuk
berwirausaha dengan probabilitas 0,000 < 0,05. Hasil pengujian secara parsial
diperoleh sikap dan perilaku (attitude) dengan nilai probabilitas 0,01 < 0,05,
norma subjektif dengan nilai probabilitas 0,001 < 0,05, dan kontrol diri dengan
probabilitas 0,023 < 0,05 secara signifikan mempengaruhi mahasiswa untuk
berwirausaha
"Closing the R&D Gap, Evaluating the Sources of R&D Spending"
No full textBoth spending and tax policies have been implemented in the United States with the goal of stimulating private sector research and development (R&D). Karier questions whether current R&D policy, especially the research and experimentation tax credit, can contribute to closing the gap between nondefense expenditures on R&D in the United States and such expenditures in other countries, such as Japan and Germany. He also explores possible changes to our current R&D policy to make it more effective.
Layanan sirkulasi di perpustakaan fakultas sains dan teknologi Universitas Islam Negeri Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta : kajian terhadap perspektif pemustaka dan pustakawan
No full textPenelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui bagaimana persepsi pemustaka terhadap sikap pustakawan dalam memberikan pelayanan serta tanggapan pustakawan terhadap persepsi pemustaka di Perpustakaan Fakultas Sains dan Teknologi Universitas Islam Negeri Syarif Hidayatulah Jakarta. Metode yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah metode deskriptif dengan pendekatan kuantitatif dan kualitatif. Untuk pendekatan kuantitatif, digunakan metode accidental sampling dengan jumlah sampel sebanyak 77 responden. Accidental sampling adalah pemilihan anggota sampelnya dilakukan terhadap orang atau benda yang kebetulan dijumpai. Sedangkan untuk pendekatan kualitatif, digunakan metode wawancara. Hasil dari penelitian ini adalah persepsi pemustaka terhadap layanan sirkulasi di Perpustakaan Fakultas Sains dan Teknologi Universitas Islam Negeri Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta sangat bagus. Hal itu dilihat dari hasil kuesioner yang menunjukan bahwa pemustaka puas dengan pelayanan yang ada di layanan sirkulasi Perpustakaan Fakultas Sains dan Teknologi Universitas Islam Negeri Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta. Sementara itu, tanggapan pustakawan terhadap persepsi pemustaka adalah akan tetap mempertahankan dan meningkatkan pelayanan yang sudah ada di Perpustakaan Fakultas Sains dan Teknologi Universitas Islam Negeri Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta.v, 70 hlm,; ilus 30 cm
In religion’s name: abuses against religious minorities in Indonesia
No full textOn February 6, 2011, in Cikeusik, a village in western Java, around 1,500 Islamist militants attacked two dozen members of the Ahmadiyah religious community with stones, sticks, and machetes. The mob shouted, “You are infidels! You are heretics!” As captured on video, local police were present at the scene but many left when the crowd began descending on the Ahmadiyah house. By the time the attack was over, three Ahmadiyah men had been bludgeoned to death.
Ahmad Masihuddin, a 25-year-old Ahmadiyah student, recalled, “They held my hands and cut my belt with a machete. They cut my shirt, pants, and undershirt. I was only in my underwear. They took 2.5 million rupiah (US$270) and my Blackberry [cell phone]. They tried to take off my underwear and cut my penis. I was laying in the fetal position. I tried to protect my face, but my left eye was stabbed. Then I heard them say, ‘He is dead, he is dead.’”
While the Cikeusik attack was particularly gruesome, it is part of a growing trend of religious intolerance and violence in Indonesia. Targets have included Ahmadis (the Ahmadiyah), Baha’is, Christians, and Shias, among others. There have also been cases of Christians in Christian-majority areas preventing Sunni Muslim mosques from being built. Affected individuals have ranged from people with permits to build houses of worship to those seeking to have their actual religion listed on their ID cards, to children bullied by teachers and other pupils at school.
In important respects, Indonesia is rightly touted for its religious diversity and tolerance. Since President Suharto was forced to step down in 1998, after more than three decades in power, inaugurating an era of greater freedom in Indonesia, viewpoints long repressed have emerged into the open. A strong thread of religious militancy is among them. As detailed in this report, the government has not responded decisively when that intolerance is expressed through acts of harassment, intimidation, and violence, which often affect freedom of expression and association, creating a climate in which more such attacks can be expected.
According to the Jakarta-based Setara Institute, which monitors religious freedom in Indonesia, there were 216 cases of violent attacks on religious minorities in 2010, 244 cases in 2011, and 264 cases in 2012. The Wahid Institute, another Jakarta-based monitoring group, documented 92 violations of religious freedom and 184 incidents of religious intolerance in 2011, up from 64 violations and 134 incidents of intolerance in 2010.
In researching this report, Human Rights Watch interviewed 16 members of religious minorities who had been physically assaulted by Islamist militants in seven separate incidents−four of them sustaining serious injuries. Twenty-two others had their houses of worship or own houses burned down in six separate incidents. We also summarize here many more incidents reported in the press or documented by other investigators. In addition to intimidation and physical assaults, houses of worship have been closed, construction of new worship facilities halted, and adherents of minority faiths subjected to arbitrary arrest on blasphemy and other charges.
In most cases, the perpetrators of the intimidation and violence have been Sunni militant groups − described throughout this report as Islamist groups − at times acting with the tacit, or occasionally open, support of government officials and police. Groups that have participated in or supported the targeting of minority religions include: the Islamic People’s Forum (Forum Umat Islam, FUI), the Indonesian Muslim Communication Forum (Forum Komunikasi Muslim Indonesia, known as Forkami), the Islamic Defenders Front (Front Pembela Islam, FPI), Hizbut-Tahrir Indonesia, and the Islamic Reformist Movement (Gerakan Islam Reformis, Garis). These groups are united by their espousal of an interpretation of Sunni Islam that labels non-Muslims, excluding Christians and Jews, as “infidels,” and labels Muslims who do not adhere to what they define as Sunni orthodoxy as “blasphemers.”
The harassment and violence directed at minority religious groups is facilitated by a legal architecture in Indonesia that purports to maintain “religious harmony,” but in practice undermines religious freedom. Indonesia’s 1945 constitution explicitly guarantees freedom of religion, as does the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, to which Indonesia is a party. However, the Indonesian government has long enacted, and in recent years strengthened, legislation and regulations that have subjected minority religions to official discrimination and made them extremely vulnerable to the members of the majority community who take the law into their own hands.
In numerous instances documented in this report, harassment and intimidation of minority communities by militant Islamist groups has been facilitated by the active or passive involvement of Indonesian government officials and security forces. These groups have cooperated with, or applied pressure on, local authorities to prevent the issuance of building permits for religious minorities’ houses of worship, sought the removal of religious minority communities to new locations, or to stop them from worshipping in their area altogether. In some cases, Christian churches that have met all of the legal requirements for construction have had their permits revoked by local authorities after pressure from Islamist groups, even in the face of Indonesian Supreme Court decisions ruling the construction legal.
This report also documents incidents in which police failed to take action to prevent violence against religious minorities or provided no assistance in the aftermath of such incidents. Police all too often have been unwilling to properly investigate reports of violence against religious minorities, suggesting complicity with the perpetrators. Nor has the justice system proven to be a defender of religious minorities. In the few cases of violence that have gone to the courts, prosecutors have sought ridiculously lenient sentences for the perpetrators of serious crimes, which the judges seem content to oblige. The exception has been cases construed by authorities as acts of “terrorism,” as with the bombing of a church in Solo, Central Java, on September 25, 2011, in which a suicide bomber died and the wife of its funder is still being prosecuted for money laundering, and an attempt to bomb another church in Serpong in April 2012, in which 19 people were arrested.
Indonesia’s religious minorities also face entrenched discrimination in their dealings with the Indonesian government bureaucracy. During the Suharto era, Indonesians were required to list their religion on their national identification cards, choosing from one of five recognized religions, a practice that discriminated against, and put in an untenable position, followers of hundreds of minority religions. Although the current Population Administration Law gives citizens the choice of whether or not to declare their religious faith on their ID cards, those who wish to declare a faith still must choose from a list of six protected religions. Individuals who do not declare a religion risk being labeled “godless” by some Muslim clerics and officials and subject to possible blasphemy prosecution. In 2012 alone, a self-declared atheist, a Shia cleric, and a spiritualist have all been jailed for blasphemy after listing Islam as their religion on their ID cards.
Indonesian government institutions have also played a role in the violation of the rights and freedoms of the country’s religious minorities. Those institutions, which include the Ministry of Religious Affairs, the Coordinating Board for Monitoring Mystical Beliefs in Society (Badan Koordinasi Pengawas Aliran Kepercayaan Masyarakat, Bakor Pakem) under the Attorney General’s Office, and the semi-official Indonesian Ulama Council, have eroded religious freedom by issuing decrees and fatwas (religious rulings) against members of religious minorities and using their position of authority to press for the prosecution of “blasphemers.”
Indonesia has in recent years made meaningful progress toward strengthening democracy and respect for human rights. Those gains, along with perceptions of Indonesia as a bulwark of a progressive, moderate Islam, have prompted international praise of Indonesia as a model Islamic democracy. For instance, in November 2010, US President Barack Obama, when visiting Jakarta, praised “the spirit of religious tolerance that is enshrined in Indonesia’s constitution, and that remains one of this country’s defining and inspiring characteristics.”
If that reputation is to remain intact, strong and immediate action is needed, including more forceful leadership by Indonesian President Susilo Bambang Yudhoyono to reform the laws and government practices that have facilitated abuses against religious minorities. The Indonesian government needs to meet its obligations to hold accountable police, government officials, and members of groups implicated in the abuses. Indonesia’s reputation as a country “underpinned by the principle of religious freedom and tolerance” can only be realized if the government takes steps to curb the increasing targeting of and discrimination against religious minorities, returning to its founding principles, and fostering a national culture of acceptance and respect for all religious groups
- …
