1,721,058 research outputs found
Postenucleation Adjuvant Chemotherapy With Vincristine, Etoposide, and Carboplatin for the Treatment of High-Risk Retinoblastoma
Full text link
How to do an enucleation for retinoblastoma
Full text linkDespite many advances in treatment, removal of the eye is sometimes unavoidable and can bring resistance from parents. Safe enucleation with implant followed by a well fitted prosthesis will encourage other parents to agree to this life-saving procedure
Retinoblastoma: Achieving new standards with methods of chemotherapy
No full textThe management of retinoblastoma (RB) has dramatically changed over the past two decades from previous radiotherapy methods to current chemotherapy strategies. RB is a remarkably chemotherapy-sensitive tumor. Chemotherapy is currently used as a first-line approach for children with this malignancy and can be delivered by intravenous, intra-arterial, periocular, and intravitreal routes. The choice of route for chemotherapy administration depends upon the tumor laterality and tumor staging. Intravenous chemotherapy (IVC) is used most often in bilateral cases, orbital RB, and as an adjuvant treatment in high-risk RB. Intra-arterial chemotherapy (IAC) is used in cases with group C or D RB and selected cases of group E tumor. Periocular chemotherapy is used as an adjunct treatment in eyes with group D and E RB and those with persistent/recurrent vitreous seeds. Intravitreal chemotherapy is reserved for eyes with persistent/recurrent vitreous seeds. In this review, we describe the various forms of chemotherapy used in the management of RB. A database search was performed on PubMed, using the terms "RB," and "treatment," "chemotherapy," "systemic chemotherapy," "IVC," "IAC," "periocular chemotherapy," or "intravitreal chemotherapy." Relevant English language articles were extracted, reviewed, and referenced appropriately
Bilateral enucleation for retinoblastoma: A study of 14 patients
No full textPURPOSE: To study the clinical profile of patients who underwent bilateral enucleation for retinoblastoma (RB).
METHODS: Retrospective study of 14 cases.
RESULTS: Of >3000 RB cases, 14 (<1%) underwent bilateral enucleation for treatment of RB. The mean age at diagnosis of RB was 26 months (median, 24 months; range, 5–72 months). All patients had bilateral RB at presentation. Intraocular RB was evident in 23 (82%) eyes and orbital tumor extension was noted in 5 (18%) eyes. Based on the International Classification of Intraocular RB, tumors were classified as Group B (n = 1; 4%), D (n = 4; 14%), or E (n = 14; 50%) at presentation. Based on the International RB Staging System, tumors were classified as Stage 1 (n = 23; 82%) or Stage 3 (n = 5; 18%). Two patients (four eyes with intraocular RB) had undergone prior treatment before presenting to us and thus could not be classified. Primary treatment included systemic chemotherapy (n = 27; 96%) or enucleation (n = 1; 4%). Five patients were lost to follow-up for a mean duration of 15 months (median, 12 months; range, 7–24 months) during treatment and presented with the orbital extension of RB in one (n = 4; 29%) or both (n = 1; 7%) eyes. Secondary enucleation was performed in 27 (96%) eyes. Over a mean follow-up period of 49 months (median, 29 months; range, 3–340 months), there was no evidence of metastasis and 1 (7%) child died due to pneumonia.
CONCLUSION: Bilateral enucleation is rare in the treatment of RB. Advanced tumor presentation or noncompliance to treatment necessitates bilateral enucleation
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
Full text linkThe present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
- …
