1,720,958 research outputs found
SwaragThaikkandi/SMdRQA: 2024.03.25
No full text<p>Added documentation
Added functions for checking nonlinearity of the time series data</p>
<h2>What's Changed</h2>
<ul>
<li>Update README.md by @SwaragThaikkandi in https://github.com/SwaragThaikkandi/SMdRQA/pull/6</li>
</ul>
<p><strong>Full Changelog</strong>: https://github.com/SwaragThaikkandi/SMdRQA/compare/Releases...2024.03.25</p>
SwaragThaikkandi/SMdRQA: v2024.03.28
No full text<h2>Changelog</h2>
<p><!-- TEMPLATE --></p>
<ul>
<li>Update actions/checkout action to v4 (#67) @renovate</li>
<li>Update actions/checkout action to v4 (#66) @renovate</li>
<li>Update actions/checkout action to v4 (#65) @renovate</li>
<li>Update RQA_functions.py (#63) @SwaragThaikkandi</li>
<li>Update release-drafter.yml (#62) @SwaragThaikkandi</li>
<li>Create release-drafter.yml (#61) @SwaragThaikkandi</li>
<li>Update requirements.txt (#53) @SwaragThaikkandi</li>
<li>Update actions/checkout action to v4 (#43) @renovate</li>
<li>Update actions/setup-python action to v5 (#44) @renovate</li>
<li>Update actions/upload-artifact action to v4 - autoclosed (#45) @renovate</li>
<li>Update codecov/codecov-action action to v4 (#47) @renovate</li>
<li>Update githubocto/repo-visualizer action to v0.9.1 (#48) @renovate</li>
<li>Repo visualizer: updated diagram (#50) @SwaragThaikkandi</li>
<li>Repo visualizer: updated diagram (#49) @SwaragThaikkandi</li>
<li>Update metrix.yml (#46) @SwaragThaikkandi</li>
<li>chore(deps): update actions/checkout action to v4 (#40) @renovate</li>
<li>chore(deps): update actions/setup-python action to v5 (#41) @renovate</li>
<li>Update README.md (#39) @SwaragThaikkandi</li>
<li>chore(deps): update codecov/codecov-action action to v4.1.0 (#38) @renovate</li>
<li>Update python-package.yml (#37) @SwaragThaikkandi</li>
<li>Update release-drafter.yml (#36) @SwaragThaikkandi</li>
<li>chore(deps): update snyk/actions digest to 8349f90 - autoclosed (#24) @renovate</li>
<li>chore(deps): update slsa-framework/slsa-github-generator action to v1.10.0 (#27) @renovate</li>
<li>chore(deps): update actions/checkout action to v4 (#28) @renovate</li>
<li>chore(deps): update actions/labeler action to v5 (#29) @renovate</li>
<li>chore(deps): update actions/setup-python action to v5 (#30) @renovate</li>
<li>chore(deps): update actions/stale action to v9 - autoclosed (#31) @renovate</li>
<li>chore(deps): update dependabot/fetch-metadata action to v2 - autoclosed (#32) @renovate</li>
<li>chore(deps): update dependency ubuntu to v22 (#33) @renovate</li>
<li>chore(deps): update github/codeql-action action to v3 - autoclosed (#34) @renovate</li>
<li>chore(deps): update release-drafter/release-drafter action to v6 (#35) @renovate</li>
<li>chore(deps): update facebook/pysa-action digest to 15c7aea - autoclosed (#22) @renovate</li>
<li>chore(deps): update github/codeql-action digest to 8075783 (#23) @renovate</li>
<li>chore(deps): update actions/checkout digest to 93ea575 (#19) @renovate</li>
<li>chore(deps): update facebook/pyre-action digest to 6dc86fc (#20) @renovate</li>
<li>chore: Configure Renovate (#18) @renovate</li>
<li>Create release-drafter.yml (#17) @SwaragThaikkandi</li>
<li>Update README.md (#15) @SwaragThaikkandi</li>
<li>[Snyk] Security upgrade numpy from 1.21.3 to 1.22.2 (#14) @SwaragThaikkandi</li>
<li>[Snyk] Security upgrade numpy from 1.21.3 to 1.22.0rc1 (#13) @SwaragThaikkandi</li>
<li>[Snyk] Security upgrade setuptools from 40.5.0 to 65.5.1 (#12) @SwaragThaikkandi</li>
<li>[Snyk] Security upgrade validators from 0.20.0 to 0.21.0 (#11) @SwaragThaikkandi</li>
<li>[Snyk] Security upgrade fonttools from 4.38.0 to 4.43.0 (#10) @SwaragThaikkandi</li>
<li>[Snyk] Security upgrade pillow from 9.5.0 to 10.0.1 (#9) @SwaragThaikkandi</li>
</ul>
Mine is Merrier: A Process Description of the Robust In-Group Bias Across Contexts Using Perceptual-Matching Task
No full textResearch suggests that individuals consistently demonstrate favorable attitudes towards members of their ingroups compared to those belonging to other social groups. Such ingroup biases are observed not only in well-established historical groups but also in minimal group settings. The current study investigates the robustness of the said ingroup bias across different contexts through four experiments. In Experiment 1, participants were merely assigned to one of the two minimal groups, and their ingroup bias was assessed. In the next three experiments (Exps 2a- 2c), the relationship between the minimal ingroups and outgroups was manipulated. In Experiment 2a, both groups were described as good and in a mutually harmonious relationship; in Experiment 2b, the two groups were in a conflicted relationship, with the ingroup described as good and the outgroup as bad; and finally, in Experiment 2c, both groups were again in a conflicted relationship with the ingroup being described as bad and the outgroup as good. The degree of ingroup bias was indexed in terms of faster response times, higher accuracy, and greater sensitivity on a perceptual-matching task. Interestingly, while the preliminary analysis showed a significant moderation of bias measures across the four experiments, a more detailed examination using Bayesian regression analysis and Drift-Diffusion Modeling established a strong persistence of ingroup favoritism despite changing group characteristics and relations. The changing relations didn’t affect the robust ingroup bias much as the general trend for favoring one’s own group persisted across all experiments. The minimal yet robust nature of ingroup favoritism is explicated
SwaragThaikkandi/SMdRQA: v2024.04.01
No full text<h2>What's Changed</h2>
<ul>
<li>Update dependency ubuntu to v22 by @renovate in https://github.com/SwaragThaikkandi/SMdRQA/pull/111</li>
<li>Update stackhawk/hawkscan-action digest to c1e45bc by @renovate in https://github.com/SwaragThaikkandi/SMdRQA/pull/110</li>
<li>Update actions/checkout action to v4 by @renovate in https://github.com/SwaragThaikkandi/SMdRQA/pull/109</li>
<li>Graphs by @SwaragThaikkandi in https://github.com/SwaragThaikkandi/SMdRQA/pull/113</li>
</ul>
<p><strong>Full Changelog</strong>: https://github.com/SwaragThaikkandi/SMdRQA/compare/SMdRQAv2024.03.31...SMdRQAv2024.04.01</p>
SwaragThaikkandi/SMdRQA: v2024.03.31
No full text<h2>What's Changed</h2>
<ul>
<li>Update stefanzweifel/git-auto-commit-action action to v5 by @renovate in https://github.com/SwaragThaikkandi/SMdRQA/pull/69</li>
<li>Update actions/github-script action to v7 by @renovate in https://github.com/SwaragThaikkandi/SMdRQA/pull/64</li>
<li>Update window_size.py by @SwaragThaikkandi in https://github.com/SwaragThaikkandi/SMdRQA/pull/71</li>
<li>Update actions/checkout action to v4 by @renovate in https://github.com/SwaragThaikkandi/SMdRQA/pull/72</li>
<li>Update window_size.py by @SwaragThaikkandi in https://github.com/SwaragThaikkandi/SMdRQA/pull/73</li>
<li>Update actions/checkout action to v4 by @renovate in https://github.com/SwaragThaikkandi/SMdRQA/pull/74</li>
<li>Update cross_validation.py by @SwaragThaikkandi in https://github.com/SwaragThaikkandi/SMdRQA/pull/75</li>
<li>Update CODING_STANDARDS.md by @SwaragThaikkandi in https://github.com/SwaragThaikkandi/SMdRQA/pull/76</li>
<li>Update requirements.txt by @SwaragThaikkandi in https://github.com/SwaragThaikkandi/SMdRQA/pull/77</li>
<li>Update setup.py by @SwaragThaikkandi in https://github.com/SwaragThaikkandi/SMdRQA/pull/79</li>
<li>Update Kuramoto_simulation.py by @SwaragThaikkandi in https://github.com/SwaragThaikkandi/SMdRQA/pull/78</li>
<li>Update actions/checkout action to v4 by @renovate in https://github.com/SwaragThaikkandi/SMdRQA/pull/80</li>
<li>Update actions/checkout action to v4 by @renovate in https://github.com/SwaragThaikkandi/SMdRQA/pull/81</li>
<li>Delete .github/workflows/pysa.yml by @SwaragThaikkandi in https://github.com/SwaragThaikkandi/SMdRQA/pull/83</li>
<li>ci(Mergify): configuration update by @SwaragThaikkandi in https://github.com/SwaragThaikkandi/SMdRQA/pull/85</li>
<li>Delete .github/workflows/ci-cd.yml by @SwaragThaikkandi in https://github.com/SwaragThaikkandi/SMdRQA/pull/84</li>
<li>ci(Mergify): configuration update by @SwaragThaikkandi in https://github.com/SwaragThaikkandi/SMdRQA/pull/87</li>
<li>chore(deps): update actions/checkout action to v4 by @renovate in https://github.com/SwaragThaikkandi/SMdRQA/pull/89</li>
<li>chore(deps): update osl-incubator/github-actions-chatgpt-pr-reviewer action to v1.0.4 by @renovate in https://github.com/SwaragThaikkandi/SMdRQA/pull/88</li>
<li>chore(deps): update actions/setup-python action to v5 by @renovate in https://github.com/SwaragThaikkandi/SMdRQA/pull/92</li>
<li>Create project.yaml by @SwaragThaikkandi in https://github.com/SwaragThaikkandi/SMdRQA/pull/58</li>
<li>Graphs by @SwaragThaikkandi in https://github.com/SwaragThaikkandi/SMdRQA/pull/95</li>
<li>chore(deps): update actions/checkout action to v4 by @renovate in https://github.com/SwaragThaikkandi/SMdRQA/pull/96</li>
<li>Update BirthdayResearch/oss-governance-bot action to v4 by @renovate in https://github.com/SwaragThaikkandi/SMdRQA/pull/101</li>
<li>Update repo_details.rst by @SwaragThaikkandi in https://github.com/SwaragThaikkandi/SMdRQA/pull/103</li>
<li>Delete Kuramoto_simulation.py by @SwaragThaikkandi in https://github.com/SwaragThaikkandi/SMdRQA/pull/105</li>
<li>Update actions/stale action to v9 by @renovate in https://github.com/SwaragThaikkandi/SMdRQA/pull/107</li>
<li>Update slsa-framework/slsa-github-generator action to v1.10.0 by @renovate in https://github.com/SwaragThaikkandi/SMdRQA/pull/106</li>
<li>Update actions/checkout action to v4 by @renovate in https://github.com/SwaragThaikkandi/SMdRQA/pull/100</li>
</ul>
<p><strong>Full Changelog</strong>: https://github.com/SwaragThaikkandi/SMdRQA/compare/untagged-c44ef82b6880c730c1fd...SMdRQAv2024.03.31</p>
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
Get PDFThe present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
Variations on the Author
Get PDF“Variations on the Author” discusses two of Eduardo Coutinho’s recent films (Um Dia na Vida, from 2010, and Últimas Conversas, posthumously released in 2015) and their contribution to the general question of documentary authorship. The director’s filmography is characterized by a consistent yet self-effacing form of authorial self-inscription: Coutinho often features as an interviewer that rather than express opinions propels discourses; an interviewer that is good at listening. This mode of self-inscription characterizes him as an author who is not expressive but who is nonetheless markedly present on the screen. In Um Dia na Vida, however, Coutinho is completely absent form the image, while Últimas Conversas, on the contrary, includes a confessional prologue that moves the director from the margins to the center of his films. This article examines the ways in which these works stand out in the filmography of a director who offers new insights into the notion of cinematic authorship
Appropriate Similarity Measures for Author Cocitation Analysis
Get PDFWe provide a number of new insights into the methodological discussion about author cocitation analysis. We first argue that the use of the Pearson correlation for measuring the similarity between authors’ cocitation profiles is not very satisfactory. We then discuss what kind of similarity measures may be used as an alternative to the Pearson correlation. We consider three similarity measures in particular. One is the well-known cosine. The other two similarity measures have not been used before in the bibliometric literature. Finally, we show by means of an example that our findings have a high practical relevance.information science;Pearson correlation;cosine;similarity measure;author cocitation analysis
Sliding window multi-dimensional recurrence quantification analysis (SMdRQA)
No full text<pre> </pre>
- …
