525 research outputs found
Interview: Carrie Sutton
Carrie Sutton is a freelance directors’ representative working with independent creatives as well as music video directors signed to Biscuit Filmworks, Blindeye Films, Good Co., Kode Media, Rankin and The Graft. In her role as Music Video Commissioner, she has commissioned videos for Blur, Tina Turner, Pet Shop Boys, Snow Patrol and Robbie Williams amongst many others, with artists picking up 3 Brit Awards for Best Video, an MTV Award and a D&AD Yellow Pencil Nomination. In 2018, she was awarded the ‘Outstanding Achievement’ award at the UK Music Video Awards in recognition of her career as a Creative Commissioner, Directors’ Rep., Executive Producer and Producer
Supplemental Material, PWQ42_2_744531_Petterson_and_Sutton - Sexist Ideology and Endorsement of Men’s Control Over Women’s Decisions in Reproductive Health
Supplemental Material, PWQ42_2_744531_Petterson_and_Sutton for Sexist Ideology and Endorsement of Men’s Control Over Women’s Decisions in Reproductive Health by Aino Petterson, and Robbie M. Sutton in Psychology of Women Quarterly</p
Supplemental Material, PWQ744531_Supplementary_Material - Sexist Ideology and Endorsement of Men’s Control Over Women’s Decisions in Reproductive Health
Supplemental Material, PWQ744531_Supplementary_Material for Sexist Ideology and Endorsement of Men’s Control Over Women’s Decisions in Reproductive Health by Aino Petterson, and Robbie M. Sutton in Psychology of Women Quarterly</p
Conspiracy EJSP -- Van der Wal, Sutton, Lange, & Braga (EASP summerschool 2014)
This collaborative project started at the EASP summer school in Lisbon (2014). Together with Prof. Robbie Sutton - the teacher of our workshop on Social Justice – we wanted to dig deeper into the cognitive processes underlying conspiracy thinking. Specifically, we proposed that conspiracy belief is driven by the perception of causal relations between events (over and above the perception of patterns). Over the years, we ran four studies to test this idea
Conspiracy EJSP -- Van der Wal, Sutton, Lange, & Braga (EASP summerschool 2014)
This collaborative project started at the EASP summer school in Lisbon (2014). Together with Prof. Robbie Sutton - the teacher of our workshop on Social Justice – we wanted to dig deeper into the cognitive processes underlying conspiracy thinking. Specifically, we proposed that conspiracy belief is driven by the perception of causal relations between events (over and above the perception of patterns). Over the years, we ran four studies to test this idea
When is it wrong to eat animals? The relevance of different animal traits and behaviours
Research suggests that animals’ capacity for agency, experience, and benevolence predict beliefs about their moral treatment. Four studies built on this work by examining how fine‐grained information about animals’ traits and behaviours (e.g., can store food for later vs. can use tools) shifted moral beliefs about eating and harming animals. The information that most strongly affected moral beliefs was related to secondary emotions (e.g., can feel nostalgia), morality (e.g., will share food with others), empathy (e.g., can feel others pain), social connections (e.g., will look for deceased family members), and moral patiency (e.g., can feel pain). In addition, information affected moral judgements in line with how it affected superordinate representations about animals’ capacity for experience/feeling but not agency/thinking. The results provide a fine‐grained outline of how, and why, information about animals’ traits and behaviours informs moral judgements
Speciesism in everyday language
Speciesism, like other forms of prejudice, is thought to be underpinned by biased patterns of language use. Thus far, however, psychological science has primarily focused on how speciesism is reflected in individuals' thoughts as opposed to wider collective systems of meaning such as language. We present a large-scale quantitative test of speciesism by applying machine-learning methods (word embeddings) to billions of English words derived from conversation, film, books, and the Internet. We found evidence of anthropocentric speciesism: words denoting concern (vs. indifference) and value (vs. valueless) were more closely associated with words denoting humans compared to many other animals. We also found evidence of companion animal speciesism: the same words were more closely associated with words denoting companion animals compared to most other animals. The work describes speciesism as a pervasive collective phenomenon that is evident in a naturally occurring expression of human psychology – everyday language
- …
