1,720,962 research outputs found
Management of newly diagnosed patients with type 2 diabetes: What are the attitudes of physicians? A SUBITO!AMD survey on the early diabetes treatment in Italy
Full text linkEarly intensive therapy in type 2 diabetes can
prevent complications. Nevertheless, metabolic control is
often sub-optimal in newly diagnosed patients. This webbased
survey aimed to evaluate opinions of physicians
about treatment, priorities, and barriers in the care of
patients first referred to diabetes clinics. Data on physician
attitudes toward therapeutic preferences for two clinical
case models (same clinical profile, except HbA1c levels of
8.6 and 7.3% at the first access, respectively) were collected.
Participants were asked to rank from 1 (most
important) to 6 (least important) a list of priorities and
barriers associated with the care of new patients. Overall,
593 physicians participated. In both case models, metformin
and education were primary options, although their
combination with other classes of drugs varied substantially.
Main priorities were ‘‘to teach the patient how to
cope with the disease’’ and ‘‘to achieve HbA1c target’’;
main barriers were ‘‘lack of time’’ and ‘‘long waiting list’’.
At multivariate analyses, physicians from the South of Italy
had a twofold higher likelihood to attribute a rank 1–2 to
organizational barriers than those operating in the North
(South vs. North: OR: 2.4; 95% CI 1.4–4.1; Center vs.
North: OR: 2.4; 95% CI 0.9–3.2). In the absence of a
widely accepted evidence-based therapeutic algorithm
driving the therapeutic choices according to the patient
characteristics, prescriptions vary according to physician
preferences. Education is perceived as a key-strategy, but
organizational barriers and geographic disparities are an
obstacle. These findings can drive new strategies to reduce
clinical inertia, attitudes variability, and geographic
disparities
Insulin requirements and carbohydrate to insulin ratio in normal weight, overweight, and obese women with type 1 diabetes under pump treatment during pregnancy: a lesson from old technologies
Full text linkAim:The primary aim of this study was to assess insulin requirements and carbohydrateto insulin ratio (CHO/IR) in normal weight, overweight, and obese pregnant women withtype 1 diabetes across early, middle, and late pregnancy.Methods:In this multicenter, retrospective, observational study we evaluated 86 of 101pregnant Caucasian women with type 1 diabetes under pump treatment. The womenwere trained to calculate CHO/IR daily by dividing CHO grams of every single meal byinsulin units injected. Since the purpose of the study was to identify the CHO/IR able toreach the glycemic target, we only selected the CHO/IR obtained when glycemic valueswere at target. Statistics: SPSS 20.Results:We studied 45 normal weight, 31 overweight, and 10 obese women. Insulinrequirements increased throughout pregnancy (p < 0.0001 and <0.001 respectively) inthe normal and overweight women, while it remained unchanged in the obese women.Insulin requirements were different between groups when expressed as an absolute value,but not when adjusted for body weight. Breakfast CHO/IR decreased progressivelythroughout pregnancy in the normal weight women, from 13.3 (9.8–6.7) at thefirst stageof pregnancy to 6.2 (3.8–8.6) (p = 0.01) at the end stage, and in the overweight womenFrontiers in Endocrinology | www.frontiersin.orgFebruary 2021 | Volume 12 | Article 6108771Edited by:Elena Succurro,University of Magna Graecia, ItalyReviewed by:Cristina Bianchi,Azienda Ospedaliero-UniversitariaPisana, ItalyMaria Grazia Dalfra’,University of Padua, Italy*Correspondence:Camilla [email protected] section:This article was submitted toObesity,a section of the journalFrontiers in EndocrinologyReceived:27 September 2020Accepted:14 January 2021Published:25 February 2021Citation:Festa C,Fresa R,Visalli N,Bitterman O,Giuliani C,Suraci C,Bongiovanni M andNapoli A (2021)Insulin Requirements andCarbohydrate to Insulin Ratio inNormal Weight, Overweight, andObese Women With Type 1Diabetes Under Pump TreatmentDuring Pregnancy: A LessonFrom Old Technologies.Front. Endocrinol. 12:610877.doi: 10.3389/fendo.2021.610877ORIGINAL RESEARCHpublished: 25 February 2021doi: 10.3389/fendo.2021.610877
from 8.5 (7.1–12.6) to 5.2 (4.0–8.1) (p = 0.001), while in the obese women it remainedstable, moving from 6.0 (5.0–7.9) to 5.1 (4.1–7.4) (p = 0.7). Likewise, lunch and dinnerCHO/IR decreased in the normal weight and overweight women (p < 0.03) and not in theobese women. The obese women gained less weight than the others, especially in earlypregnancy when they even lost a median of 1.25 (−1−1.1) kg (p = 0.005). In earlypregnancy, we found a correlation between pregestational BMI and insulin requirements(IU/day) or CHO/IR at each meal (p < 0.001 and p = 0.001, respectively). In latepregnancy, a relationship between pre-gestational BMI and CHO/IR change was found(P = 0.004), as well as between weight gain and CHO/IR change (p=0.02). Thesignificance was lost when both variables were included in the multiple regressionanalysis. There was no difference in pregnancy outcomes except for a higher pre-termdelivery rate in the obese women.Conclusion:Pre-gestational BMI and weight gain may play a role in determining CHO/IRduring pregnancy in women with type 1 diabetes under pump treatment
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
Full text linkThe present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
Variations on the Author
Full text link“Variations on the Author” discusses two of Eduardo Coutinho’s recent films (Um Dia na Vida, from 2010, and Últimas Conversas, posthumously released in 2015) and their contribution to the general question of documentary authorship. The director’s filmography is characterized by a consistent yet self-effacing form of authorial self-inscription: Coutinho often features as an interviewer that rather than express opinions propels discourses; an interviewer that is good at listening. This mode of self-inscription characterizes him as an author who is not expressive but who is nonetheless markedly present on the screen. In Um Dia na Vida, however, Coutinho is completely absent form the image, while Últimas Conversas, on the contrary, includes a confessional prologue that moves the director from the margins to the center of his films. This article examines the ways in which these works stand out in the filmography of a director who offers new insights into the notion of cinematic authorship
Appropriate Similarity Measures for Author Cocitation Analysis
Full text linkWe provide a number of new insights into the methodological discussion about author cocitation analysis. We first argue that the use of the Pearson correlation for measuring the similarity between authors’ cocitation profiles is not very satisfactory. We then discuss what kind of similarity measures may be used as an alternative to the Pearson correlation. We consider three similarity measures in particular. One is the well-known cosine. The other two similarity measures have not been used before in the bibliometric literature. Finally, we show by means of an example that our findings have a high practical relevance.information science;Pearson correlation;cosine;similarity measure;author cocitation analysis
Dispelling the Myths Behind First-author Citation Counts
Full text linkWe conducted a full-scale evaluative citation analysis study of scholars in the XML research field to explore just how different from each other author rankings resulting from different citation counting methods actually are, and to demonstrate the capability of emerging data and tools on the Web in supporting more realistic citation counting methods. Our results contest some common arguments for the continued
use of first-author citation counts in the evaluation of scholars, such as high correlations between author rankings by first-author citation counts and other citation
counting methods, and high costs of using more realistic citation counting methods that are not well-supported by the ISI databases. It is argued that increasingly available digital full text research papers make it possible for citation analysis studies to go beyond what the ISI databases have directly supported and to employ more
sophisticated methods
koamabayili/VECTRON-author-checklist: VECTRON author checklist
No full textWe have done our best to complete the author checklist relating to the use of animals in the hut study. Note that the objective for the hut study was to evaluate the IRS treatment applications for residual efficacy against Anopheles mosquitoes, including the local An. coluzzii mosquito population. Cows were only used to attract mosquitoes into the huts and no tests were carried out directly on the cows. The author checklist is intended for use with studies where experiments are carried out on animals, which is why we have had such difficulty in completing this for the hut study, as many of the questions do not relate to how the cows were used
Author-wise bibliometric analysis based on entropy.
No full textAuthor-wise bibliometric analysis based on entropy.</p
- …
