1,720,988 research outputs found

    Synopsis of subfamily Haplogleniinae Newman, 1853 in China (Neuroptera: Ascalaphidae)

    No full text
    Zhang, Jie, Sun, Mingxia, Wang, Xinli (2015): Synopsis of subfamily Haplogleniinae Newman, 1853 in China (Neuroptera: Ascalaphidae). Zootaxa 3941 (3): 375-390, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.3941.3.

    FIGURES 20–25. Protidricerus steropterus. 20. Male. 21. Male genitalia, lateral view. 22. Male genitalia, ventral view. 23. Female. 24. Female terminalia, lateral view. 25 in Synopsis of subfamily Haplogleniinae Newman, 1853 in China (Neuroptera: Ascalaphidae)

    No full text
    FIGURES 20–25. Protidricerus steropterus. 20. Male. 21. Male genitalia, lateral view. 22. Male genitalia, ventral view. 23. Female. 24. Female terminalia, lateral view. 25. Female Terminalia, ventral view.Published as part of Zhang, Jie, Sun, Mingxia & Wang, Xinli, 2015, Synopsis of subfamily Haplogleniinae Newman, 1853 in China (Neuroptera: Ascalaphidae), pp. 375-390 in Zootaxa 3941 (3) on page 386, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.3941.3.4, http://zenodo.org/record/23997

    FIGURES 11–14 in New species of the owl-fly genus Suhpalacsa Lefèbvre from China (Neuroptera: Ascalaphidae)

    No full text
    FIGURES 11–14. Male terminalia. Suhpalacsa fuscimarginata Wang et Sun sp. nov.: 11. lateral view; 12. ventral view; 13–14. Suhpalacsa fumiala Wang et Sun sp. nov.: 13. lateral view; 14. ventral view. FIGURES. 15–16. Female terminalia. Suhpalacsa fuscimarginata Wang et Sun sp. nov., 15. lateral view; 16. ventral view.Published as part of Wang, Xinli, Sun, Mingxia & Liang, Aiping, 2008, New species of the owl-fly genus Suhpalacsa Lefèbvre from China (Neuroptera: Ascalaphidae), pp. 53-60 in Zootaxa 1808 on page 58, DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.27433

    Suhpalacsa Lefebvre 1842

    No full text
    Genus Suhpalacsa Lefèbvre, 1842 Suhpalacsa Lefèbvre, 1842: 7. Type species: Ascalaphus flavipes Leach, 1814: 48. Suphalasca Hagen, 1866: 373. Suhpalasca Banks 1913: 230. Ceraus Navás, 1900: 95. Diagnosis of Suhpalacsa Lefèbvre. At this time, their diagnosis for Suhpalacsa follows that given by New (1984): “Wings generally elongate and narrow, venation not particularly dense. Forewing anal margin rounded or slightly angled, not produced. Wings apices rounded, sometimes slightly tapered; apical field broad, with two or three rows of cells. Antennae straight, unornamented, club pear-shaped, about 3 / 4 forewing length. Legs short, usually somewhat thickened. Abdomen generally shorter than hindwing.”Published as part of Wang, Xinli, Sun, Mingxia & Liang, Aiping, 2008, New species of the owl-fly genus Suhpalacsa Lefèbvre from China (Neuroptera: Ascalaphidae), pp. 53-60 in Zootaxa 1808 on page 54, DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.27433

    Protidricerus Weele 1908

    No full text
    Protidricerus Weele, 1908 Protidricerus Weele, 1908: 61. Type species: Idricerus exilis McLachlan, 1894; by original designation. Diagnosis. Wings wide or very narrow, apical area wider. Forewing and hind wing with 3 rows of cells in apical area. Forewings axillary angle absent or somewhat projecting. Antennae longer than 1 / 2 length of forewing. Leg short and thick, spur of hind tibiae as long as 1 st and 2 nd tarsomere. Abdomen shorter than hind wing. Distribution. China, Japan, Philippines, Borneo.Published as part of Zhang, Jie, Sun, Mingxia & Wang, Xinli, 2015, Synopsis of subfamily Haplogleniinae Newman, 1853 in China (Neuroptera: Ascalaphidae), pp. 375-390 in Zootaxa 3941 (3) on page 381, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.3941.3.4, http://zenodo.org/record/23997

    Idricerus sjostedti Navas 1927

    No full text
    <i>Idricerus sjostedti</i> Navás, 1927 <p> <i>Idricerus sjostedti</i> Navás, 1927: 1</p> <p> <b>Material examined.</b> none.</p> <p> <b>Distribution.</b> China: Canton.</p> <p> Navás (1927) described a new species, <i>Idricerus sjostedti</i>, based on one female specimen collected from China. This holotype was deposited in the Museum de Stockholm.</p>Published as part of <i>Zhang, Jie, Sun, Mingxia & Wang, Xinli, 2015, Synopsis of subfamily Haplogleniinae Newman, 1853 in China (Neuroptera: Ascalaphidae), pp. 375-390 in Zootaxa 3941 (3)</i> on page 380, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.3941.3.4, <a href="http://zenodo.org/record/239978">http://zenodo.org/record/239978</a&gt

    Idricerus weelei Navas 1909

    No full text
    Idricerus weelei Navás, 1909 Idricerus weelei Navás 1909: 56. Original description: body length 30 mm, abdomen length 20 mm, forewing length 36 mm, hind wing length 32 mm, antenna length 25 mm. Redescribe according to the original published figure: Axillary angle of forewing distinct, long lobe shape. Apical area with 2 rows of cells, Cu area with 5–6 rows of cells. Rs branches 6. Rs-I and Rs-II far from each other at starting point and then approach gradually, almost no parallel part. Hing wing apical area with 2 rows of cells, Cu area with 4 rows of cells. Material examined. none. Distribution. China: Hong Kong. Remark. Sziráki (1998) reported that this species distribute in Hong Kong. But there were no more detailed information of specimen collection and preservation. Because no examined specimen of this species was examined, the key to species of Idricerus doesn’t include it.Published as part of Zhang, Jie, Sun, Mingxia & Wang, Xinli, 2015, Synopsis of subfamily Haplogleniinae Newman, 1853 in China (Neuroptera: Ascalaphidae), pp. 375-390 in Zootaxa 3941 (3) on pages 380-381, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.3941.3.4, http://zenodo.org/record/23997

    Suhpalacsa

    No full text
    Key to Chinese species of Suhpalacsa 1. Wings narrow, outer border and hind border almost like as a straight line. Costal area not fuscous.......... 2 - Wings broad, outer border and hind border deeply arc-shaped. Costal area fuscous.................................. 5 2. Thorax nota with a median pale stripe .................................................................................... S. formosana - Thorax nota without a median pale stripe................................................................................................... 3 3. Three rows of cells in apical area of forewings.......................................................................... S. umbrosa - Two rows of cells in apical area of forewings............................................................................................. 4 4. Thorax nota with distinct peac-like yellow marks.................................................................. S. longialata - Thorax nota without yellow marks .............................................................................................. S. hainana 5. Wings smoky infuscate colour, apical area not fuscous ............................................................... S. fumiala - Wings mostly hyaline; costal area fuscous partially or mostly in apical area............................................. 5 6. Thorax nota yellow with two black stripes, apical area of wings mostly dark ................. S. fuscimarginata - Thorax nota without distinct mark, apical area of wings near pterostigma yellow brown............................ ......................................................................................................................................... S. jianfanglinganaPublished as part of Wang, Xinli, Sun, Mingxia & Liang, Aiping, 2008, New species of the owl-fly genus Suhpalacsa Lefèbvre from China (Neuroptera: Ascalaphidae), pp. 53-60 in Zootaxa 1808 on pages 58-59, DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.27433

    Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis

    Full text link
    The present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
    corecore