1,720,957 research outputs found

    Nutrients’ interactions with biochar’s surface chemistry

    No full text
    Soil nutrients (NO3- and NH4+) are essential for crop growth. However, the presence of excess nutrients poses a significant environmental threat. Pyrogenic carbon materials, such as biochar, have gained attention in recent studies as fertilizer aids which can potentially mitigate nutrients from agricultural runoffs. Understanding interactions of NO3- and NH4+ with biochar’s surface chemistry is critical in evaluating effectiveness of biochar in mitigating risks of nutrient leaching. Surface chemical properties of biochar such as surface functional groups, pH, and elemental and mineral composition have been found to influence NO3- and NH4+ chemisorption mechanisms. The paper summarises the pertinent literature in this domain.https://www.massey.ac.nz/~flrc/workshops/17/Programme_Final_2017.pd

    Development of microbial fuel cell as biosensor for detection of organic matter of wastewater

    Get PDF
    The removal of biodegradable organic matters (BOM) is a very important aspect of evaluating the treatment efficiency in a wastewater treatment plant. However, conventional Biochemical Oxygen Demand (BOD) method is time consuming (3 or 5 days) and not suitable for online process monitoring. Instead biosensors can be used to measure BOD. Microbial Fuel Cell (MFC) biosensor which uses electroactive biofilms as sensing element has the advantage of long-term stability and minimizes the replacement of sensing elements. BOM could be directly converted to electricity via MFC, where MFC itself is an integration of signal generator and transducer. Proton Exchange Membrane (PEM) is a very important component of MFC and the most widely used Nafion PEM (NPEM) is costly (Jurado and Colomer, 2002; Liu et al., 2006, Jana et al., 2010). Previously, researchers have successfully used low cost clayware separators as PEM (CWPEM) with improved performance of MFC (Behera et al., 2009, Jana et al., 2010). Comparative studies has been carried out between MFC-1 (NPEM) and MFC-2 (CWPEM) to evaluate the performance of MFC as biosensor using mixed anaerobic culture with synthetic wastewater containing acetate as source of carbon. MFC-1 biosensor responds linearly between COD (Chemical Oxygen Demand) concentration of 22 mg/L and 51 mg/L (R2=0.954) with a response time between 120 min and 210 min. Similarly, MFC-2 biosensor responds linearly between a concentration 64 mg/L and 212 mg/L (R2=0.949) with a response time between 310 min and 120 min. The variation in rate of proton conductivity (PC) and thickness of the separators is suspected to be the cause for variation in range of detection and response time. The current market price of NPEM is very high i.e. Rs. 4000/10 cm2 and that of CWPEM is Rs. 4/10 cm2. With improvement in PC of CWPEM, low cost MFC biosensor can be successfully developed. Once successfully developed, such low cost MFC based sensors can be calibrated for BOD

    Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis

    Get PDF
    The present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed

    Variations on the Author

    Get PDF
    “Variations on the Author” discusses two of Eduardo Coutinho’s recent films (Um Dia na Vida, from 2010, and Últimas Conversas, posthumously released in 2015) and their contribution to the general question of documentary authorship. The director’s filmography is characterized by a consistent yet self-effacing form of authorial self-inscription: Coutinho often features as an interviewer that rather than express opinions propels discourses; an interviewer that is good at listening. This mode of self-inscription characterizes him as an author who is not expressive but who is nonetheless markedly present on the screen. In Um Dia na Vida, however, Coutinho is completely absent form the image, while Últimas Conversas, on the contrary, includes a confessional prologue that moves the director from the margins to the center of his films. This article examines the ways in which these works stand out in the filmography of a director who offers new insights into the notion of cinematic authorship

    Appropriate Similarity Measures for Author Cocitation Analysis

    Get PDF
    We provide a number of new insights into the methodological discussion about author cocitation analysis. We first argue that the use of the Pearson correlation for measuring the similarity between authors’ cocitation profiles is not very satisfactory. We then discuss what kind of similarity measures may be used as an alternative to the Pearson correlation. We consider three similarity measures in particular. One is the well-known cosine. The other two similarity measures have not been used before in the bibliometric literature. Finally, we show by means of an example that our findings have a high practical relevance.information science;Pearson correlation;cosine;similarity measure;author cocitation analysis

    Acidic surface functional groups control chemisorption of ammonium onto carbon materials in aqueous media

    No full text
    Elucidation of mechanistic insight into the interaction of carbon materials' physicochemical surface properties and ammonium (NH4+) adsorption in aqueous media was made by conducting a systematic study using a wide range of carbon materials. Three types of biochars (rice husk, poultry litter, and enhanced poultry litter) and activated carbons (fresh and aged coconut shell-based and charcoal-based) were used for investigating the NH4+ adsorption mechanism. Poultry litter biochar, with lowest surface area (3 m2 g−1) and largest pore diameter (29 nm), showed the highest NH4+ adsorption capacity (0.34 mg NH4+g−1), while charcoal-based activated carbon, with the highest surface area (1133 m2 g−1) and small pore diameter (6 nm), had the least NH4+ adsorption capacity (0.09 mg NH4+g−1). The value of Freundlich isotherm constant ‘n’ was >1 for all tested carbon materials indicating chemisorption as the dominant sorption mechanism. Aging of the carbon surface resulted in 30% increase in NH4+ retention. Surface chemical properties that most influenced NH4+ chemisorption on to carbon materials were found to be acidic surface functional groups (ASFGs), elemental composition, ash content, and pH. The optimal conditions for NH4+ adsorption, regardless of type and source of carbon materials, were solution pH of 8, a high amount of ash content, and carboxyl, carbonyl, and phenolic functional groups. Evaluation of CEC and ASFGs indicated that CEC and ASFGs are not equivalent terms. Through this study, conducted on carbon adsorbents derived from different sources, with different surface physical and chemical properties, we established that ASFGs, and not CEC, play a critical role in ammonium chemisorption on carbon materials. The study showed that low cost and eco-friendly biochars, with optimal surface chemistry, can replace expensive activated carbons for NH4+ remediation in aqueous media

    Dispelling the Myths Behind First-author Citation Counts

    Get PDF
    We conducted a full-scale evaluative citation analysis study of scholars in the XML research field to explore just how different from each other author rankings resulting from different citation counting methods actually are, and to demonstrate the capability of emerging data and tools on the Web in supporting more realistic citation counting methods. Our results contest some common arguments for the continued use of first-author citation counts in the evaluation of scholars, such as high correlations between author rankings by first-author citation counts and other citation counting methods, and high costs of using more realistic citation counting methods that are not well-supported by the ISI databases. It is argued that increasingly available digital full text research papers make it possible for citation analysis studies to go beyond what the ISI databases have directly supported and to employ more sophisticated methods

    Author Index

    No full text
    Nao informado
    corecore