1,720,954 research outputs found
Is robotic better than laparoscopic approach for right colectomy? A cohort study from two Tuscany centers
No full textLa chirurgia miniinvasiva sta sostituendo la chirurgia a cielo aperto in quasi tutte le discipline chirurgiche. L’uso del robot nella chirurgia laparoscopica invece sta diventando sempre più frequente. Ad esso vengono riconosciuti dei vantaggi come la migliore visualizzazione, maggiore stabilità, più grande amplitudine di movimento del polso robotico, la filtrazione del tremore e degli svantaggi come il più lungo tempo operatorio e il costo più alto. Alcuni studi hanno cercato di confrontare la chirurgia robotica e laparoscopica con risultati discordanti. La diffusione della tecnica CME per l’emicolectomia destra potrebbe beneficiare dalla piattaforma robotica. Lo scopo del nostro studio è stato il confronto ai risultati a breve termine dell’emicolectomia destra robotica e laparoscopica. I dati delle procedure di emicolectomia destra robotica e laparoscopica eseguite dal 1 gennaio 2013 al 31 dicembre 31 2019 in due ospedali toscani sono stati raccolti e analizzati retrospettivamente. Sono stati confrontati la degenza media, le complicanze, la canalizzazione ai gas, il tempo operatorio, la percentuale di conversione e il numero dei linfonodi asportati fra le due tecniche robotiche. Il numero totale dei pazienti sottoposti a emicolectomia destra robotica e laparoscopica è stato 211. Sedici pazienti sono stati esclusi dallo studio. Dei 195 pazienti inclusi, 143 sono stati operati con la tecnica robotica e 52 con la tecnica laparoscopica. Non ci sono state differenze riguardo la degenza media (7 giorni per entrambi), canalizzazione ai gas (4 giorni per entrambe te procedure), la deiscenza anastomotica (2 con la tecnica robotica e 2 in laparoscopia), e le complicanze Clavien- Dindo 3-5. Il tempo operatorio (215 vs 175 minuti) e il numero dei linfonodi asportati (19 vs 15) è stato significativamente più grande nell’approccio robotico.Robotic surgery is becoming more and more frequent. In colon surgery it can be used safely with similar results to laparoscopic surgery. The objective of our work is to retrospectively compare the short-term results (30 days) of robotic and laparoscopic right hemicolectomy. It will be helpful to understand if there are any advantages of robotic over laparoscopic surgery. METHODS: Data of miniinvasive (laparoscopic and robotic) right colectomy procedures performed from January 1, 2013 to December 31, 2019 in two Tuscany hospitals were retrospectively collected and analyzed. The mean hospital stay, complication rate, flatus pass, operative time, conversion rate and the number of removed lymph nodes, between the two methods have been compared. RESULTS: The total number of the patients that underwent right miniinvasive colectomy was 211. Sixteen patients were excluded from the study. Of the 195 included patients, 143 were operated with the robotic approach, and 52 with the laparoscopic one. There was no significant difference between the mean hospital stay (7 days in both), canalization to gas (4 days in both), anastomotic dehiscence (2 in robotic and 1 in laparoscopy), and Clavien Dindo 3 - 5 grade complications. The operation time (215 vs 175 min) and the number of retrieved lymph nodes (19 vs 15) were significantly greater in the robotic approach. CONCLUSION: The robotic approach may be advantageous in terms of surgical radicality with the price of a greater operative time. KEY WORDS: Laparoscopic, Right colectomy, Robotic
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
Full text linkThe present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
Variations on the Author
Full text link“Variations on the Author” discusses two of Eduardo Coutinho’s recent films (Um Dia na Vida, from 2010, and Últimas Conversas, posthumously released in 2015) and their contribution to the general question of documentary authorship. The director’s filmography is characterized by a consistent yet self-effacing form of authorial self-inscription: Coutinho often features as an interviewer that rather than express opinions propels discourses; an interviewer that is good at listening. This mode of self-inscription characterizes him as an author who is not expressive but who is nonetheless markedly present on the screen. In Um Dia na Vida, however, Coutinho is completely absent form the image, while Últimas Conversas, on the contrary, includes a confessional prologue that moves the director from the margins to the center of his films. This article examines the ways in which these works stand out in the filmography of a director who offers new insights into the notion of cinematic authorship
Appropriate Similarity Measures for Author Cocitation Analysis
Full text linkWe provide a number of new insights into the methodological discussion about author cocitation analysis. We first argue that the use of the Pearson correlation for measuring the similarity between authors’ cocitation profiles is not very satisfactory. We then discuss what kind of similarity measures may be used as an alternative to the Pearson correlation. We consider three similarity measures in particular. One is the well-known cosine. The other two similarity measures have not been used before in the bibliometric literature. Finally, we show by means of an example that our findings have a high practical relevance.information science;Pearson correlation;cosine;similarity measure;author cocitation analysis
Dispelling the Myths Behind First-author Citation Counts
Full text linkWe conducted a full-scale evaluative citation analysis study of scholars in the XML research field to explore just how different from each other author rankings resulting from different citation counting methods actually are, and to demonstrate the capability of emerging data and tools on the Web in supporting more realistic citation counting methods. Our results contest some common arguments for the continued
use of first-author citation counts in the evaluation of scholars, such as high correlations between author rankings by first-author citation counts and other citation
counting methods, and high costs of using more realistic citation counting methods that are not well-supported by the ISI databases. It is argued that increasingly available digital full text research papers make it possible for citation analysis studies to go beyond what the ISI databases have directly supported and to employ more
sophisticated methods
koamabayili/VECTRON-author-checklist: VECTRON author checklist
No full textWe have done our best to complete the author checklist relating to the use of animals in the hut study. Note that the objective for the hut study was to evaluate the IRS treatment applications for residual efficacy against Anopheles mosquitoes, including the local An. coluzzii mosquito population. Cows were only used to attract mosquitoes into the huts and no tests were carried out directly on the cows. The author checklist is intended for use with studies where experiments are carried out on animals, which is why we have had such difficulty in completing this for the hut study, as many of the questions do not relate to how the cows were used
Author-wise bibliometric analysis based on entropy.
No full textAuthor-wise bibliometric analysis based on entropy.</p
Author Under Sail The Imagination of Jack London, 1893-1902
No full textIn Author Under Sail, Jay Williams offers the first complete literary biography of Jack London as a professional writer engaged in the labor of writing. It examines the authorial imagination in London's work, the use of imagination in both his fiction and nonfiction, and the ways he defined imagination in the creative process in his business dealings with his publishers, editors, and agents. In this first volume of a two-volume biography, Williams traverses the years 1893 to 1902, from London's "Story of a Typhoon" to The People of the Abyss. The Jack London who emerges in the pages of Author Under Sail is a writer whose partnership with publishers, most notably his productive alliance with George Brett of Macmillan, was one of the most formative in American literary history. London pioneered many author models during the heyday of realism and naturalism, blurring the boundaries of these popular genres by focusing on absorption and theatricality and the representation of the seen and unseen. London created an impassioned, sincere, and extremely personal realism unlike that of other American writers of the time. Author Under Sail is a literary tour de force that reveals the full range of London as writer, creative citizen, and entrepreneur at the same time it sheds light on the maverick side of machine-age literature.Intro -- Title Page -- Copyright Page -- Dedication -- Contents -- Acknowledgments -- Introduction -- 1. Spirit Truth -- 2. From Absorption to Theatricality and Back Again -- 3. "I Will Build a New Present" -- 4. Sons as Authors -- 5. Fathers as Publishers -- 6. The Daughter as Author -- 7. Lovers as Authors -- 8. At Sea with the Family -- 9. Yellow News, Yellow Stories -- 10. The Return Home -- Notes -- Bibliography -- Index -- About Jay WilliamsIn Author Under Sail, Jay Williams offers the first complete literary biography of Jack London as a professional writer engaged in the labor of writing. It examines the authorial imagination in London's work, the use of imagination in both his fiction and nonfiction, and the ways he defined imagination in the creative process in his business dealings with his publishers, editors, and agents. In this first volume of a two-volume biography, Williams traverses the years 1893 to 1902, from London's "Story of a Typhoon" to The People of the Abyss. The Jack London who emerges in the pages of Author Under Sail is a writer whose partnership with publishers, most notably his productive alliance with George Brett of Macmillan, was one of the most formative in American literary history. London pioneered many author models during the heyday of realism and naturalism, blurring the boundaries of these popular genres by focusing on absorption and theatricality and the representation of the seen and unseen. London created an impassioned, sincere, and extremely personal realism unlike that of other American writers of the time. Author Under Sail is a literary tour de force that reveals the full range of London as writer, creative citizen, and entrepreneur at the same time it sheds light on the maverick side of machine-age literature.Description based on publisher supplied metadata and other sources.Electronic reproduction. Ann Arbor, Michigan : ProQuest Ebook Central, YYYY. Available via World Wide Web. Access may be limited to ProQuest Ebook Central affiliated libraries
- …
