1,721,760 research outputs found
Tong su yan yi
No full textV.1-13. 《新鐫批評出像通俗奇俠禪眞逸史》乾集. 卷一. 第一至五回 -- 坎集. 卷二. 第六至十回 -- 艮集. 卷三. 第十一至十五回 -- 震集. 卷四. 第十六至二十回 -- 巽集. 卷五. 第二十一至二十五回 -- 離集. 卷六. 第二十六至三十回 -- 坤集. 卷七. 第三十一至三十五回 -- 兌集. 卷八. 第三十六至四十回.v.14-20. 《新鐫批評出像通俗演義禪眞後史》甲集. 卷一. 第一至六回 -- 乙集. 卷二. 第七至十二回 -- 丙集. 卷三. 第十三至十八回 -- 丁集. 卷四. 第十九至二十四回 -- 戊集. 卷五. 第二十五至三十二回 -- [己集. 卷六]. 第三十三至三十六回 -- 庚集. 卷七. 第三十七至四十二回 -- 辛集. 卷八. 第四十三至五十三回.Detailed table of contents in vernacular field only.Detailed table of contents in vernacular field only.淸溪道人編次 ; 心心僊侶...[et al.]評訂. 新鐫批評出像通俗演義禪眞後史 : 共八卷五十三回 / 淸溪道人編次 ; 冲和居士評校.綫裝, 2函.框14x10.3公分, 10行24字, 無界行. 白口, 左右雙邊, 單黑魚尾. 版心上鐫"禪眞逸史", 中鐫回次, 下鐫葉次. 《後史》行間有批點.見《香港中文大學圖書館古藉善本書錄》(2001, p. 156)《逸史》内封頁題"禪真逸史, 清心道人編次, 本衙梓行" ; 《後史》内封頁題"通俗演義, 禪真後史, 本衙藏板"《後史》前有崇禎己巳[1629]翠娛閣主人序.Library's copy: 原書《後史》第三十一至三十二回葉次亂序, 並缺第三十一回首數葉.Xian zhuang, 2 han.Kuang 14 x 10.3 gong fen, 10 hang 24 zi, wu jie hang. Bai kou, zuo you shuang bian, dan hei yu wei. Ban xin shang juan "Chan zhen yi shi", zhong juan hui ci, xia juan ye ci. "Hou shi" hang jian you pi dian.Jian "Xianggang Zhong wen da xue tu shu guan gu ji shan ben shu lu" (2001, p. 156)"Yi shi" nei feng ye ti "Chan zhen yi shi, Qingxindaoren bian ci, ben ya zi xing" ; "Hou shi" nei feng ye ti "Tong su yan yi, Chan zhen hou shi, ben ya cang ban""Hou shi" qian you Chongzhen ji si [1629] Cuiyugezhuren xu.Fiction.Qingxidaoren bian ci ; Xinxinxianlu ...[et al.] ping ding. Xin juan pi ping chu xiang tong su yan yi chan zhen hou shi : gong ba juan wu shi san hui / Qingxidaoren bian ci ; Chonghejushi ping jiao.Library's copy: yuan shu "Hou shi" di san shi yi zhi san shi er hui ye ci luan xu, bing que di san shi yi hui shou shu ye
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
Full text linkThe present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
An empirical study on Korean consumer attitute toward C-to-C e-business
Full text linkThesis(Master) --KDI School:Master of Business Administration,2009masterpublishedby Jin, Su Yan
Variations on the Author
Full text link“Variations on the Author” discusses two of Eduardo Coutinho’s recent films (Um Dia na Vida, from 2010, and Últimas Conversas, posthumously released in 2015) and their contribution to the general question of documentary authorship. The director’s filmography is characterized by a consistent yet self-effacing form of authorial self-inscription: Coutinho often features as an interviewer that rather than express opinions propels discourses; an interviewer that is good at listening. This mode of self-inscription characterizes him as an author who is not expressive but who is nonetheless markedly present on the screen. In Um Dia na Vida, however, Coutinho is completely absent form the image, while Últimas Conversas, on the contrary, includes a confessional prologue that moves the director from the margins to the center of his films. This article examines the ways in which these works stand out in the filmography of a director who offers new insights into the notion of cinematic authorship
Appropriate Similarity Measures for Author Cocitation Analysis
Full text linkWe provide a number of new insights into the methodological discussion about author cocitation analysis. We first argue that the use of the Pearson correlation for measuring the similarity between authors’ cocitation profiles is not very satisfactory. We then discuss what kind of similarity measures may be used as an alternative to the Pearson correlation. We consider three similarity measures in particular. One is the well-known cosine. The other two similarity measures have not been used before in the bibliometric literature. Finally, we show by means of an example that our findings have a high practical relevance.information science;Pearson correlation;cosine;similarity measure;author cocitation analysis
Dispelling the Myths Behind First-author Citation Counts
Full text linkWe conducted a full-scale evaluative citation analysis study of scholars in the XML research field to explore just how different from each other author rankings resulting from different citation counting methods actually are, and to demonstrate the capability of emerging data and tools on the Web in supporting more realistic citation counting methods. Our results contest some common arguments for the continued
use of first-author citation counts in the evaluation of scholars, such as high correlations between author rankings by first-author citation counts and other citation
counting methods, and high costs of using more realistic citation counting methods that are not well-supported by the ISI databases. It is argued that increasingly available digital full text research papers make it possible for citation analysis studies to go beyond what the ISI databases have directly supported and to employ more
sophisticated methods
koamabayili/VECTRON-author-checklist: VECTRON author checklist
No full textWe have done our best to complete the author checklist relating to the use of animals in the hut study. Note that the objective for the hut study was to evaluate the IRS treatment applications for residual efficacy against Anopheles mosquitoes, including the local An. coluzzii mosquito population. Cows were only used to attract mosquitoes into the huts and no tests were carried out directly on the cows. The author checklist is intended for use with studies where experiments are carried out on animals, which is why we have had such difficulty in completing this for the hut study, as many of the questions do not relate to how the cows were used
Author-wise bibliometric analysis based on entropy.
No full textAuthor-wise bibliometric analysis based on entropy.</p
- …
