1,720,962 research outputs found

    Separation of native prion protein (PrP) glycoforms by copper-binding using immobilized metal affinity chromatography (IMAC)

    No full text
    The conformational conversion of the normal cellular prion protein (PrPC) into the pathology-associated PrPSc isoform is a key event in TSEs (transmissible spongiform encephalopathies). The host PrPC molecule contains two N-linked glycosylation sites and binds copper under physiological conditions. In contrast with PrPC, PrPSc is insoluble in non-ionic detergents and does not bind to Cu2+ ions. Hence, we utilized copper binding to separate and characterize both PrP isoforms. Infected and uninfected murine brain and bovine stem brain specimens were treated with the mild non-ionic detergent n-octyl-β-D-glucopyranoside (octylglucoside) to maintain the native PrP conformations during isolation. The solubilized homogenates were loaded on to Cu2+-saturated IMAC (immobilized metal affinity chromatography) columns and eluted using the chelating agent EDTA. Fractions were separated by SDS/PAGE and analysed by immunoblotting using anti-PrP monoclonal antibodies for glycosylation profiling. Whereas native PrPC and denatured PrPSc were retained by a Cu2+-loaded resin, native PrPSc and PrPres [PK (proteinase K)-resistant PrP] passed through the column. We demonstrate here that the IMAC technique is appropriate to isolate and partially purify PrPC from healthy brains in its native-like and biologically relevant glycosylated copper-binding forms. The IMAC technique is also well suited for the separation of native PrPC from aggregated PrPSc in infected brains. Our results indicate that in contrast with PrPSc in uninfected as well as infected brains, PrPC is predominantly present in the glycosylated forms

    Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis

    Full text link
    The present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed

    Variations on the Author

    Full text link
    “Variations on the Author” discusses two of Eduardo Coutinho’s recent films (Um Dia na Vida, from 2010, and Últimas Conversas, posthumously released in 2015) and their contribution to the general question of documentary authorship. The director’s filmography is characterized by a consistent yet self-effacing form of authorial self-inscription: Coutinho often features as an interviewer that rather than express opinions propels discourses; an interviewer that is good at listening. This mode of self-inscription characterizes him as an author who is not expressive but who is nonetheless markedly present on the screen. In Um Dia na Vida, however, Coutinho is completely absent form the image, while Últimas Conversas, on the contrary, includes a confessional prologue that moves the director from the margins to the center of his films. This article examines the ways in which these works stand out in the filmography of a director who offers new insights into the notion of cinematic authorship

    Appropriate Similarity Measures for Author Cocitation Analysis

    Full text link
    We provide a number of new insights into the methodological discussion about author cocitation analysis. We first argue that the use of the Pearson correlation for measuring the similarity between authors’ cocitation profiles is not very satisfactory. We then discuss what kind of similarity measures may be used as an alternative to the Pearson correlation. We consider three similarity measures in particular. One is the well-known cosine. The other two similarity measures have not been used before in the bibliometric literature. Finally, we show by means of an example that our findings have a high practical relevance.information science;Pearson correlation;cosine;similarity measure;author cocitation analysis

    Dispelling the Myths Behind First-author Citation Counts

    Full text link
    We conducted a full-scale evaluative citation analysis study of scholars in the XML research field to explore just how different from each other author rankings resulting from different citation counting methods actually are, and to demonstrate the capability of emerging data and tools on the Web in supporting more realistic citation counting methods. Our results contest some common arguments for the continued use of first-author citation counts in the evaluation of scholars, such as high correlations between author rankings by first-author citation counts and other citation counting methods, and high costs of using more realistic citation counting methods that are not well-supported by the ISI databases. It is argued that increasingly available digital full text research papers make it possible for citation analysis studies to go beyond what the ISI databases have directly supported and to employ more sophisticated methods
    corecore