1,720,965 research outputs found

    The true coppy of a letter sent from Thomas, Earle of Arundell, Lord Marshall, from Middleborough in Zealand, to Mr. Pym. [electronic resource] : And read before the committee the 18. of September, 1641. Whereunto is added the coppy of another letter sent to Mr. Pym also from the committee in Scotland, Sep. 13. 1641. With the names of the committees that sat there for that day.

    No full text
    Thomas Earle of Arundell was appointed to escort Marie de Mâedicis, Queen Dowager of France, to Holland. -- Cf. BM.Letter from committee in Scotland signed: "Phillip Stapleton. John Hambden."Reproduction of the original in the British Library.Wing (2nd ed.)ThomasonElectronic reproduction

    To the Kings most excellent Maiesty the humble petition of the Lords and Commons in Parliament sent by Sir Philip Stapleton to his excellency the Earle of Essex, and by him presented to His Sacred Majesty.

    No full text
    [2], 8 [i.e. 4] p.Imperfect: p. 3-6 lacking in numbering only."Ordered by the Lords and Commons in Parliament that this petition be forthwith printed and published: Hen. Elsygne [sic], Cler. Parl. D. Com."Reproduction of the original in the Bodleian Library

    Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis

    Get PDF
    The present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
    corecore