1,720,959 research outputs found
Schwangerschaftsabbrüche neu denken: Eine historische Chance für Reproduktive Gerechtigkeit
No full textDerzeit gibt es in Deutschland politisch ein kritisches Zeitfenster mit guten Voraus-
setzungen für die notwendige Entkriminalisierung des Schwangerschaftsabbruchs. Sollte
diese historische Chance in der jetzigen Legislaturperiode verpasst werden, droht die
weitere Einschränkung sexueller und reproduktiver Gesundheit und Rechte (SRGR) durch
antifeministische und rechtsextreme Bewegungen. Dieses Policy Paper formuliert poli-
tische Handlungsempfehlungen zur Entkriminalisierung des Schwangerschaftsabbruchs in
Deutschland. Mit einer intersektionalen feministischen Perspektive und dem Konzept
der Reproduktiven Gerechtigkeit zeigt das fünfte Policy Paper der Reihe «Körper, Kinder,
Kassensturz: Handlungsempfehlungen zum Koalitionsvertrag» insbesondere die Not-
wendigkeit der umfassenden Berücksichtigung vulnerabler und diskriminierter Personen-
gruppen bei einer Neuregelung des Rechts auf selbstbestimmte Schwangerschafts-
abbrüche und für eine bessere Versorgungssituation auf
"›Alles gut‹ gibt es nicht!" : Die ärztliche Rolle in Entscheidungsprozessen zu Pränataldiagnostik
No full text"Die meisten wollen einfach hören, dass das Kind gesund ist." - Das Bild von Behinderung in der ärztlichen Beratung zu Pränataldiagnostik
No full textDieser Beitrag untersucht, welches Bild von Behinderung schwangerschaftsbegleitende Ärzt*innen haben und wie sich dieses in ihrer Beratung werdender Eltern zu Pränataldiagnostik (PND) ausdrückt. Die Datengrundlage bilden 20 Expert*innen-Interviews mit niedergelassenen Gynäkolog*innen. Die Auswertung erfolgt mithilfe der qualitativen Inhaltsanalyse nach Gläser und Laudel (2010). Mehrheitlich bildet sich in den Interviews eine kritische Haltung gegenüber der gezielten vorgeburtlichen Suche nach fetalen Beeinträchtigungen ab. Die Befragten verstehen es als entscheidenden Teil der ärztlichen Aufgabe, im Rahmen der Schwangerschaftsbegleitung durch Information, Aufklärung und Beratung informierte Entscheidungen zu ermöglichen. Obwohl Ableismus und vorgeburtliche Selektion kritisiert werden, sind die Interviews durchzogen von diskriminierender Sprache und ableistischen Annahmen. Um eine ergebnisoffenere ärztliche Beratung zu PND zu gewährleisten, gilt es also, das weiterhin wirkmächtige Medizinische Modell von Behinderung abzubauen.This article explores how the perceptions of disability of doctors providing pregnancy care are reflected in their counselling of expectant parents on prenatal diagnostics. The research is based on 20 expert interviews with practising gynaecologists. The data was analysed using Gläser and Laudel's qualitative content analysis (2010). The majority of the interviews reveal that doctors are critical of targeted prenatal screening for foetal impairment. The interviewees believe that it is an essential part of their professional role to provide counselling during pregnancy to enable truly informed choices by providing information, education and counselling. Although ableism and prenatal selection are criticized, the interviews are riddled with discriminatory language and ableist assumptions. It is, therefore, important to dismantle the influential medical model of disability to ensure open and unbiased medical counselling on prenatal diagnosis
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
No full textThe present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
Variations on the Author
No full text“Variations on the Author” discusses two of Eduardo Coutinho’s recent films (Um Dia na Vida, from 2010, and Últimas Conversas, posthumously released in 2015) and their contribution to the general question of documentary authorship. The director’s filmography is characterized by a consistent yet self-effacing form of authorial self-inscription: Coutinho often features as an interviewer that rather than express opinions propels discourses; an interviewer that is good at listening. This mode of self-inscription characterizes him as an author who is not expressive but who is nonetheless markedly present on the screen. In Um Dia na Vida, however, Coutinho is completely absent form the image, while Últimas Conversas, on the contrary, includes a confessional prologue that moves the director from the margins to the center of his films. This article examines the ways in which these works stand out in the filmography of a director who offers new insights into the notion of cinematic authorship
Appropriate Similarity Measures for Author Cocitation Analysis
No full textWe provide a number of new insights into the methodological discussion about author cocitation analysis. We first argue that the use of the Pearson correlation for measuring the similarity between authors’ cocitation profiles is not very satisfactory. We then discuss what kind of similarity measures may be used as an alternative to the Pearson correlation. We consider three similarity measures in particular. One is the well-known cosine. The other two similarity measures have not been used before in the bibliometric literature. Finally, we show by means of an example that our findings have a high practical relevance.information science;Pearson correlation;cosine;similarity measure;author cocitation analysis
Dispelling the Myths Behind First-author Citation Counts
No full textWe conducted a full-scale evaluative citation analysis study of scholars in the XML research field to explore just how different from each other author rankings resulting from different citation counting methods actually are, and to demonstrate the capability of emerging data and tools on the Web in supporting more realistic citation counting methods. Our results contest some common arguments for the continued
use of first-author citation counts in the evaluation of scholars, such as high correlations between author rankings by first-author citation counts and other citation
counting methods, and high costs of using more realistic citation counting methods that are not well-supported by the ISI databases. It is argued that increasingly available digital full text research papers make it possible for citation analysis studies to go beyond what the ISI databases have directly supported and to employ more
sophisticated methods
- …
