1,721,198 research outputs found

    Mining similar pattern with Attribute Oriented Induction High Level Emerging Pattern (AOI-HEP) data mining technique

    No full text
    AOI-HEP (Attribute Oriented Induction High Emerging Pattern) as new data mining technique has been success to mine frequent pattern and is extended to mine similar patterns. AOI-HEP is success to mine 3 and 1 similar patterns from IPUMS and breast cancer UCI machine learning datasets respectively. Meanwhile, the experiments showed that there was no finding similar patterns on adult and census UCI machine learning datasets. The experiments showed that finding AOI-HEP similar pattern in dataset is influenced by learning on chosen high level concept attribute in concept hierarchy and it is applied to AOI-HEP frequent pattern in previous research as well. The experiments chosed high level concept attributes such as workclass, clump thickness, means and marts for adult, breast cancer, census and IPUMS datasets respectively. In order to proof that the chosen high level concept attribute will influences the AOI-HEP similar pattern in dataset, then extended experiments were carried on and the finding were census dataset which had been none AOI-HEP similar pattern, had AOI-HEP similar pattern when learned on high level concept in marital attribute. Meanwhile, Breast cancer which had been had 1 AOI-HEP similar pattern, had none AOI-HEP similar pattern when learned on high level concept in attributes such as cell size, cell shape and bare nuclei. The 2 of 3 finding Similar patterns in IPUMS dataset have strong discriminant rule since having large growth rates such as 1.53% and 3.47%, and having large supports in target dataset such as 4.54% and 5.45 respectively. Moreover, there have small supports in contrasting dataset such as 2.96% and 1.57% respectively

    GAME INFORMATION SYSTEM

    No full text

    Using Attribute Oriented Induction High Level Emerging Pattern (AOI-HEP) to Mine Frequent Patterns

    Get PDF
    Frequent patterns in Attribute Oriented Induction High level Emerging Pattern (AOI-HEP), are recognized when have maximum subsumption target (superset) into contrasting (subset) datasets (contrasting ⊂ target) and having large High Emerging Pattern (HEP) growth rate and support in target dataset. HEP Frequent patterns had been successful mined with AOI-HEP upon 4 UCI machine learning datasets such as adult, breast cancer, census and IPUMS with the number of instances of 48842, 569, 2458285 and 256932 respectively and each dataset has concept hierarchies built from its five chosen attributes. There are 2 and 1 finding frequent patterns from adult and breast cancer datasets, while there is no frequent pattern from census and IPUMS datasets. The finding HEP frequent patterns from adult dataset are adult which have government workclass with an intermediate education (80.53%) and America as native country(33%). Meanwhile, the only 1 HEP frequent pattern from breast cancer dataset is breast cancer which have clump thickness type of AboutAverClump with cell size of VeryLargeSize(3.56%). Finding HEP frequent patterns with AOI-HEP are influenced by learning on high level concept in one of chosen attribute and extended experiment upon adult dataset where learn on marital-status attribute showed that there is no finding frequent pattern

    Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis

    Full text link
    The present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
    corecore