1,721,048 research outputs found

    Gender impact on pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasm (PanNEN) prognosis according to survival nomograms

    No full text
    Purpose: Personalizing care and outcome evaluation are important aims in the field of NEN and nomograms may represent useful tools for clinicians. Of note, gender difference is being progressively more considered in NEN care, as it may also impact on survival. This systematic review aims to describe and analyze the available nomograms on pancreatic NENs (PanNENs) to identify if gender differences are evaluated and if they could impact on patients’ management and prognosis. Methods: We performed an electronic-based search using PubMed updated until June 2024, summarizing the available evidence of gender impact on PanNEN survival outcomes as emerges from published nomograms. Results: 34 articles were identified regarding prognostic nomograms in PanNEN fields. The most included variables were age, tumor grade, tumor stage, while only 5 papers (14.7%) included sex as one of the key model variables with a significant impact on patients’ prognosis. These 5 studies analyzed a total of 18,920 PanNENs. 3 studies found a significant impact of sex on overall survival (OS), whereas the remaining 2 studies showed no significant impact of sex on OS. Conclusions: Gender difference is being progressively more considered in PanNEN diagnosis, care and survival. Nomograms represent a potentially useful tool in patients’ management and in outcomes prediction in the field of PanNENs. A key role of sex in the prognosis of PanNENs has been found in few models, while definitive conclusions couldn’t be drawn. Future studies are needed to finally establish gender impact on PanNEN prognosis

    Gender perspective in Lung Neuroendocrine Tumors: a critical review

    No full text
    Background: The role of gender has gained attention in oncology. In the setting of lung neuroendocrine tumors (L-NETs) the existence of differences between male and females has been suggested, but no clear-cut data are available. We aim to provide a critical analysis of the existing literature regarding sex role in L-NETs. Methods: We performed an extensive search of the available literature to provide a critical narrative review focused on key topics as epidemiology, histopathological and molecular features, functioning syndromes, prognosis and response/toxicity to treatments in L-NETs according to sex. Results: Female patients are more likely to have a L-NET than males. The reasons underlying this gender differences are still unclear; a biologic mechanism for the sex difference is possible, through a role for hormones in regulating gene expression and promoting neuroendocrine cell proliferation. A difference in immunohistochemical biomarkers has been found; thyroid transcription factor-1 (TTF-1) expression appears to be associated with female gender; at molecular level in the majority of studies L-NET mutational profile is not stratified for sex. In terms of prognosis, a correlation between male gender and a more aggressive disease has been found. Patient's gender has been recognized as a key modulator in the response/resistance to anticancer treatments, however for L-NETs the available data regarding the activity of different treatments and their toxicities are scarce as in clinical trials designed for L-NETs a stratified evaluation of drugs' activity according to patients' sex is largely missing. Conclusions: There is emerging evidence suggesting a gender role in L-NETs, however further studies are needed to better understand the pathogenesis of these tumors and to plan tailored treatments

    Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis

    Full text link
    The present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed

    Variations on the Author

    Full text link
    “Variations on the Author” discusses two of Eduardo Coutinho’s recent films (Um Dia na Vida, from 2010, and Últimas Conversas, posthumously released in 2015) and their contribution to the general question of documentary authorship. The director’s filmography is characterized by a consistent yet self-effacing form of authorial self-inscription: Coutinho often features as an interviewer that rather than express opinions propels discourses; an interviewer that is good at listening. This mode of self-inscription characterizes him as an author who is not expressive but who is nonetheless markedly present on the screen. In Um Dia na Vida, however, Coutinho is completely absent form the image, while Últimas Conversas, on the contrary, includes a confessional prologue that moves the director from the margins to the center of his films. This article examines the ways in which these works stand out in the filmography of a director who offers new insights into the notion of cinematic authorship

    Appropriate Similarity Measures for Author Cocitation Analysis

    Full text link
    We provide a number of new insights into the methodological discussion about author cocitation analysis. We first argue that the use of the Pearson correlation for measuring the similarity between authors’ cocitation profiles is not very satisfactory. We then discuss what kind of similarity measures may be used as an alternative to the Pearson correlation. We consider three similarity measures in particular. One is the well-known cosine. The other two similarity measures have not been used before in the bibliometric literature. Finally, we show by means of an example that our findings have a high practical relevance.information science;Pearson correlation;cosine;similarity measure;author cocitation analysis

    Dispelling the Myths Behind First-author Citation Counts

    Full text link
    We conducted a full-scale evaluative citation analysis study of scholars in the XML research field to explore just how different from each other author rankings resulting from different citation counting methods actually are, and to demonstrate the capability of emerging data and tools on the Web in supporting more realistic citation counting methods. Our results contest some common arguments for the continued use of first-author citation counts in the evaluation of scholars, such as high correlations between author rankings by first-author citation counts and other citation counting methods, and high costs of using more realistic citation counting methods that are not well-supported by the ISI databases. It is argued that increasingly available digital full text research papers make it possible for citation analysis studies to go beyond what the ISI databases have directly supported and to employ more sophisticated methods

    Author Index

    No full text
    Nao informado

    koamabayili/VECTRON-author-checklist: VECTRON author checklist

    No full text
    We have done our best to complete the author checklist relating to the use of animals in the hut study. Note that the objective for the hut study was to evaluate the IRS treatment applications for residual efficacy against Anopheles mosquitoes, including the local An. coluzzii mosquito population. Cows were only used to attract mosquitoes into the huts and no tests were carried out directly on the cows. The author checklist is intended for use with studies where experiments are carried out on animals, which is why we have had such difficulty in completing this for the hut study, as many of the questions do not relate to how the cows were used
    corecore