1,721,020 research outputs found
Diplomanti FDV na delu v tujini, 2013
Raziskava je bila izvedena v okviru tedna Svobodne univerze (15.–19. 4. 2013). Cilj raziskave je bil proučiti izkušnje diplomantov, magistrov in doktorandov FDV v zvezi z iskanjem zaposlitve v tujini. Ugotavljalo se je, koliko jih je aktivno iskalo delo v tujini in koliko jih je (bilo) zaposlenih v tujini, v katerih državah in v katerem sektorju. Poizvedovalo se je tudi, ali bi glede na pridobljeno znanje priporočili študij na FDV ter v kolikšni meri so s študijem pridobili določene kompetence. Pridobljene so bile tudi informacije o študijskem programu/smeri.The survey was carried out during the Free University Week (15-19 April 2013). The aim was to analyze the experience of graduates and post-graduates of the Faculty of Social Sciences (FSS) (University of Ljubljana) regarding their active aspirations for working abroad. The survey explores how many of them have been searching for a job abroad very actively and how many were (and are) actually employed abroad, in which countries and sectors. The survey also investigated if respondents would recommend the study at the FSS and to what extent they gained certain work-related skills during their study at the FSS. The database includes information on the study programs
Študenti Univerze v Ljubljani na mednarodni izmenjavi, 2013
Raziskava je bila izvedena v okviru tedna Svobodne univerze (15.–19. 4. 2013). Cilj raziskave je bil primerjati študente UL na mednarodni izmenjavi (ta anketa) s tujimi študenti na izmenjavi na UL (ADP_IDNo. IZMTUJ13) glede na znanje, veščine in pogoje za študij . Glavni namen raziskave je zapolniti praznino na raziskovalnem področju, povezanim s spremljanjem mednarodne izmenjave v Sloveniji (konkretno na UL), saj nobena od institucij, povezanih z načrtovanje ali izvajanjem mednarodne izmenjave študentov tovrstnih podatkov ne zbira, kaj šele analizira. Namen te baze podatkov je omogočiti celostno analizo primerljivosti domačih (UL) in tujih študentov po znanju in veščinah, potrebnih za študij in pridobljenih skozi študij, po študijskih dosežkih in po študijskih pogojih. Najbolj daljnosežen cilj raziskave je na podlagi analize podatkov priporočiti izboljšanje načrtovanja in izvajanja programov mednarodne izmenjave na UL (in širše v Sloveniji) z namenom dviga kakovosti internacionalizacije slovenskega visokega šolstva ter hkrati možnosti izgradnje izobraževanja kot komponente mehke moči države v mednarodnih odnosih.The survey was conducted as one of the activities of the Free University week (15-19 April 2013). The aim of the study was to compare students of the University of Ljubljana (UL) within international exchange programmes (this survey) with foreign exchange students at UL (ADP_IDNo. IZMTUJ13) with respect to knowledge, skills and study conditions. The main purpose of this research is to fill a research gap in the area of monitoring international exchange in Slovenia (specifically at the UL), since none of the institutions related to the formulation or implementation of international student exchange perform collection of such data, let alone its analysis. The purpose of this database is to provide a comprehensive analysis of comparable domestic (UL) and foreign students according to their existing knowledge and skills necessary for the study and the one obtained through the study abroad, the study results and study conditions. The most ambitious goal of the research is to enable policy recommendations for improving the planning and implementation of international exchange programs (at the UL and generally in Slovenia) with the aim of raising the quality of internationalization of Slovenian higher education and at the same time the possibility of building education as a component of the country's soft power in international relations
Tuji študenti na mednarodni izmenjavi na Univerzi v Ljubljani, 2013
Raziskava je bila izvedena v okviru tedna Svobodne univerze (15.–19. 4. 2013). Cilj raziskave je bil primerjati študente UL na mednarodni izmenjavi (ADP_IDNo. IZMDOM13) s tujimi študenti na izmenjavi na UL (ta anketa) glede na znanje, veščine in pogoje za študij. Glavni namen raziskave je zapolniti praznino na raziskovalnem področju, povezanim s spremljanjem mednarodne izmenjave v Sloveniji (konkretno na UL), saj nobena od institucij, povezanih z načrtovanje ali izvajanjem mednarodne izmenjave študentov tovrstnih podatkov ne zbira, kaj šele analizira. Namen te baze podatkov je omogočiti celostno analizo primerljivosti domačih (UL) in tujih študentov po znanju in veščinah, potrebnih za študij in pridobljenih skozi študij, po študijskih dosežkih in po študijskih pogojih. Najbolj daljnosežen cilj raziskave je na podlagi analize podatkov priporočiti izboljšanje načrtovanja in izvajanja programov mednarodne izmenjave na UL (in širše v Sloveniji) z namenom dviga kakovosti internacionalizacije slovenskega visokega šolstva ter hkrati možnosti izgradnje izobraževanja kot komponente mehke moči države v mednarodnih odnosih.The survey was conducted as one of the activities of the Free University week (15-19 April 2013). The aim of the study was to compare students of the University of Ljubljana (UL) within international exchange programmes (ADP_IDNo. IZMDOM13) with foreign exchange students at UL (this survey) with respect to knowledge, skills and study conditions. The main purpose of this research is to fill a research gap in the area of monitoring international exchange in Slovenia (specifically at the UL), since none of the institutions related to the formulation or implementation of international student exchange perform collection of such data, let alone its analysis. The purpose of this database is to provide a comprehensive analysis of comparable domestic (UL) and foreign students according to their existing knowledge and skills necessary for the study and the one obtained through the study abroad, the study results and study conditions. The most ambitious goal of the research is to enable policy recommendations for improving the planning and implementation of international exchange programs (at the UL and generally in Slovenia) with the aim of raising the quality of internationalization of Slovenian higher education and at the same time the possibility of building education as a component of the country's soft power in international relations
Počutje in odnos do cepljenja, 2021
Gre za novo, razširjeno verzijo podatkovne datoteke iz raziskave o počutju in odnosu do cepljenja med pandemijo COVID-19, ki jo je izvedla mednarodna skupina neodvisnih raziskovalcev. V tej verziji so poleg podatkov s Poljske, Romunije in Slovenije dodatno vključeni še podatki zbrani na Madžarskem. Namen študije je bil v proučevanih državah ugotoviti počutje in odnos prebivalstva do cepljenja ter analizirati, kako sta povezana z različnimi socio-demografskimi značilnostmi, vključno z religioznostjo in politično usmerjenostjo. Ker je raziskava potekala v več državah je bilo za pripravo skupne podatkovne datoteke potrebnih nekaj prilagoditev in usklajevanj. Predlagamo, da si pred uporabo podatkov preberete spremna gradiva z dodatnimi pojasnili, predvsem dokument »Opis neskladnosti in priprava podatkovne datoteke«. Na Madžarskem so raziskavo izvajali nekaj tednov kasneje kot v državah, ki so bile zajete v prvi objavi leta 2021 z naslovom »Počutje in odnos do cepljenja, 2021: Namera za cepljenje proti COVID-19 na Poljskem, v Romuniji in Sloveniji (doi.org/10.17898/ADP_POCP21_V1)«. Poleg podatkov za Madžarsko, nova verzija datoteke zajema tudi 7 novih spremenljivk, in sicer Q22_2rr; Q28_r; Q29_r; Q11_depR; Q11_anxR; Q11_strR; Q15bothR, pri čemer so vse izračunane na podlagi objavljenih primarnih spremenljivk. Izjema je spremenljivka Q15bothR, ki je bila izračunana z uporabo nove metodologije (vse 4 države), medtem ko primarna spremenljivka zajema podatke izračunane po stari metodologiji, vendar zgolj za 3 že objavljene države (brez Madžarske). Dotična raziskava ima dopolnjen naslov, avtorstvo ter spremna gradiva. Za opis prve objave (V1) brez Madžarske glej gradivo "Opis_V1.pdf". Zaradi lažje dostopnosti so določena gradiva iz prve verzije dostopna tudi v okviru te objave. Datoteka je dostopna v dveh verzijah tj. kot SUF verzija (dostop pod posebnimi pogoji), ki je delno anonimizirana in namenjena uporabi le v raziskovalne namene in kot PUF verzija (standardni dostop), ki je anonimizirana in namenjena splošni rabi v raziskovanju. Odgovori na odprto vprašanje so dostopni v dodatni datoteki (*xlsx format), pri čemer gre le za odgovore slovenskih respondentov.This is a new, expanded version of the dataset from a survey on feelings and attitudes towards vaccination during the COVID-19 pandemic conducted by an international group of independent researchers. This version in addition to data from Poland, Romania and Slovenia also includes data collected in Hungary. The purpose of the survey was to determine the well-being of the population in relation to vaccination in the studied countries and to analyse how they are related to different socio-demographic characteristics, including religiosity and political orientation. As the survey was conducted in several countries, some adjustments and harmonizations were needed to prepare a common data file. It is advised that you read the accompanying materials with additional explanations before using the data, especially the document “Description of inconsistency issues and preparation of data file«. In Hungary the survey was conducted a few weeks later than in the countries covered in the first release in 2021 titled " Feelings and attitudes towards vaccination, 2021: COVID-19 vaccination intention in Poland, Romania and Slovenia (doi.org/10.17898/ADP_POCP21_V1)". In addition to data for Hungary, the new version of the file also includes 7 new variables, namely Q22_2rr; Q28_r; Q29_r; Q11_depR; Q11_anxR; Q11_strR; Q15bothR, all of which are calculated based on the published primary variables. The exception is the variable Q15bothR, which was calculated using the new methodology (all 4 countries), while the primary variable includes data calculated using the old methodology, but only for 3 already published countries (excluding Hungary). The study in question has an updated title, authorship and supporting materials. For a description of the first publication (V1) without Hungary, see the document "Opis_V1.pdf". For ease of access, certain materials from the first version are also available within this new publication. The file is available in two versions, ie. as the SUF version (access under special conditions), that is partially anonymised and intended for use for research purposes only, and as the PUF version (standard access), which is anonymised and intended for general use in research. The answers to the open question are available in an additional file (*xlsx format), containing the answers only of Slovenian respondents
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
The present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
Variations on the Author
“Variations on the Author” discusses two of Eduardo Coutinho’s recent films (Um Dia na Vida, from 2010, and Últimas Conversas, posthumously released in 2015) and their contribution to the general question of documentary authorship. The director’s filmography is characterized by a consistent yet self-effacing form of authorial self-inscription: Coutinho often features as an interviewer that rather than express opinions propels discourses; an interviewer that is good at listening. This mode of self-inscription characterizes him as an author who is not expressive but who is nonetheless markedly present on the screen. In Um Dia na Vida, however, Coutinho is completely absent form the image, while Últimas Conversas, on the contrary, includes a confessional prologue that moves the director from the margins to the center of his films. This article examines the ways in which these works stand out in the filmography of a director who offers new insights into the notion of cinematic authorship
Appropriate Similarity Measures for Author Cocitation Analysis
We provide a number of new insights into the methodological discussion about author cocitation analysis. We first argue that the use of the Pearson correlation for measuring the similarity between authors’ cocitation profiles is not very satisfactory. We then discuss what kind of similarity measures may be used as an alternative to the Pearson correlation. We consider three similarity measures in particular. One is the well-known cosine. The other two similarity measures have not been used before in the bibliometric literature. Finally, we show by means of an example that our findings have a high practical relevance.information science;Pearson correlation;cosine;similarity measure;author cocitation analysis
Residential renovation in Slovenia: comparison of survey and registry data
Data on residential renovations are crucial for assessing their energy efficiency and living conditions of residents. Based on the real estate register data in Slovenia, we have information about the year of construction of buildings, as well as the year of renovation of roofs, facades, windows, and installations. However, the data for the period after 2007, when the last real estate census was conducted, is incomplete. Moreover, official surveys also have very limited data on this topic. To get more detailed insights into the renovation procedures of Slovenian households, we conducted our own survey on a web panel, which provided insights into renovation characteristics not captured by existing data sources. This contribution compares survey data on renovations with registry data and attempts to evaluate the quality of survey data.The author acknowledge receiving funding from the Slovenian Research Agency for the project Using questionnaires to measure attitudes and behaviours of building users [Z5-1879] and from the European Cooperation in Science and Technology for the InnoRenew project [grant agreement #739574] under the H2020 Spreading Excellence and Widening Participation Horizon2020 Widespread-Teaming program
The Use of Survey Questionnaires to Measure Attitudes and Behaviours Related to Sustainable Building Issues
<p>The building sector accounts for almost a third of the global final energy consumption and attempts to lower it can have a big impact on the environment. Social sciences have an important role to play in shaping the built environment by conducting research on the predesign and design process and post-occupancy evaluation. In this context, measuring attitudes and behaviours of building users with surveys can play an important role in achieving sustainability goals.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>This contribution is based on a systematic literature review that focuses on published research studies that use surveys to examine environmental comfort, energy consumption and other sustainability issues related to building construction and use. The review assesses the quality of contributions and identifies knowledge gaps. Moreover, works that involve specific demographics groups and deal with inequalities are identified. In parallel, an inventory of survey questionnaires and items is generated and a selection of them is assessed with available survey questionnaire evaluation methods. Based on the results improvements of survey research practices to study sustainable building issues are proposed and further research needs are identified.</p>The author acknowledges the support of the Slovenian Research Agency for funding the project using questionnaires to measure attitudes and behaviours of building users (Z5-1879) and the European Commission for funding the InnoRenew project [Grant Agreement #739574] under the Horizon 2020 Widespread-Teaming program
- …
