1,720,980 research outputs found
Sintania Pic 1908
Subgenus Sintania Pic, 1908 Pic, 1908: 59 (Sintania; species included: himalayica, kashmirensis); Pic, 1914: 318 (Rybinskiella (Sintania); status change); Jeannel 1922: 47 (Sintania; status change; synonymy with Rybinskiella); Jeannel, 1936: 292 (Rybinskiella (Sintania); key to species); Szymczakowski, 1970: 278 (Rybinskiella (Sintania); status change); Frank, 1988: 262 (Rybinskiella (Sintania); characters); Perreau, 2000: 146 (Rybinskiella (Sintania); world catalog; 9 species); Perreau, 2004: 141 (Rybinskiella (Sintania); Palaearctic catalog; distribution); Perreau, 2015: 192 (Rybinskiella (Sintania); Palaearctic catalog; distribution). Type species: Sintania himalayica Pic, 1908, by subsequent designation by Jeannel (1922: 47).Published as part of Wang, Cheng-Bin & Zhou, Hong-Zhang, 2016, Sinocatops gen. nov., an apterous genus of Cholevini (Coleoptera: Leiodidae: Cholevinae) from China, with emphasis on differences with allied Rybinskiella Reitter, 1906, pp. 393-415 in Zootaxa 4085 (3) on page 407, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4085.3.4, http://zenodo.org/record/105264
Rybinskiella (Sintania) bodoana Reitter 1913
Rybinskiella (Sintania) bodoana Reitter, 1913 (Figs. 2E, F; 3G–L; 4B; 5B; 6D–F; 7B; 8B; 9B; 12A–K; 13A–C; 14A–E) Reitter, 1913: 668 (Rybinskiella; type locality: Chinesich-Turkestan: Thian-Schan); Hach, 1928: 207 (Rybinskiella; catalog); Jeannel, 1936: 294 (Rybinskiella (Sintania); key to species); Frank, 1988: 267 (Rybinskiella; complementary description; distribution); Růžička, 1994: 7 (Rybinskiella; complementary description; distribution); Perreau, 2000: 146 (Rybinskiella (Sintania); in catalog); Perreau, 2004: 141 (Rybinskiella (Sintania); in catalog; distribution); Perreau, 2015: 192 (Rybinskiella (Sintania); in catalog; distribution). Material examined. CHINA, Xinjiang: 1♂, 1♀, Narat Mt. R., Bodon Valley, alp. meadows, h = 3000–3240 M, 43°01'09–47" N 83°10' 21–25"E, 25.07.2014, I. I. Kabak leg. / Rybinskiella bodoana Reitter, 1913; V. Zinchenko det. 2014 (ISEA). Redescription. Male. EBL: 5.71 mm. Length of different body parts: HL: AL: PL: ELL = 0.93: 3.45: 1.23: 3.28 mm; width: HW: EW: PW: ELW = 1.05: 0.05: 1.66: 2.30 mm. Proportion of antennomeres from base to tip in µm (length × width): 227 × 106, 276 × 99, 355 × 105, 320 × 105, 277 × 105, 294 × 110, 336 × 132, 272 × 98, 271 × 132, 248 × 147, 368 × 135. Habitus (Fig. 2E) elongate, evenly convex and sublustrous; well pigmented: mostly blackish brown; mouthparts, apical half of ultimate antennomere, and tarsi somewhat paler. Dorsum continually clothed with short, recumbent and sallow pubescence; elytra intermixed with long, erect hairs. Head only slightly wider than long, HW/HL = 1.14. Surface covered with large, coarse and sparse punctures, separated about 2.0–3.0 times of their diameter, interspaces microreticulate. Clypeofrontal suture absent. Clypeus with gently emarginate anterior margin. Compound eye built from ca. 23–27 ommatidia, EW/HW = 0.05. Antennae (Fig. 12A) very long and slender, AL/HW = 3.27; all antennomeres distinctly longer than wide; length of 3rd/2nd = 1.29; 11th longest, narrowly pear-shape. Cervical sclerite with length/width = 2.11 in medial view (Fig. 4B). Pronotum (Fig. 12B) subcampanulate and not much transverse, widest around middle, PW/PL = 1.35. Sides regularly narrowed forward from widest and gently constricted before hind corners. Hind corners rounded, protruding backward. Posterior margin slightly bisinuate, emarginate behind hind corners. Surface covered with fine punctures, interspaces transversely microreticulate, with distinct depression in each latero-basal area. Elytra oval, incompletely fused with each other, widest at about basal 1/3, ELL/EW = 1.42. Sides regularly curved, evenly narrowing from widest to apex; apices rounded (Fig. 12G). Sutural striae absent. Surface covered with fine punctures, interspace with microtrichiae, aligning into transverse line. Metathoracic wings absent. Prolegs slender, with basal three protarsomeres (Fig. 12C) strongly expanded: TW/BTW = 0.96. Protibiae (Fig. 12E) expanded inward in middle part, without visible outer spines. Profemora without tubercle on inner side. Mesotibiae very slightly curved, 1 st mesotarsomere (Fig. 7B) strongly expanded. Metatibiae very slightly curved. Abdominal ventrite VIII (Fig. 12I) without middle indentation at anterior edge, while protruded posteriorly in middle of posterior edge. Genital segment (Fig. 12J) with spiculum gastrale slender and expanded at apex, and weakly expanded and deflexed dorso-ventrally (Fig. 12K); tergite IX rounded ventro-apically. Aedeagus (Fig. 13A, B) with median lobe extremely long and slender (length/width = 10.78), slightly undulate, gradually narrowing apically from preapical part and terminated to a widely subrounded knob in dorsal view; parameres filiform, reached about apical 1/3 of median lobe, each with two apical setae; basal lama short; ventral operculum with two narrow lobes, each tapered towards apex and gently incurved. In lateral view, median lobe almost straight above curved base, thickened in middle part and flatted in apical part, apex slightly dorsally upturned (Fig. 13C). Internal sac (Fig. 13A–C) with a long acuminated tooth at apex, a cluster of phanerae in middle region, and a pair of teeth in basal region. Female. Stouter and duller than male in general appearance (Fig. 2F), and also can be distinguished by the following characteristics: pro- & mesotarsi simply linear (Fig. 12D); protibiae (Fig. 12F) simply slender, furnished outer spines; elytral apices (Fig. 12H) distinctly acuminated; ventrite VII (Fig. 14A) almost simply emarginate at posterior edge; tergite VIII (Fig. 14B) truncate at posterior edge, with desclerotized area like the shape of an upside-down Chinese character “ ”; ventrite VIII (Fig. 14C) gently curved at posterior edge, with spiculum ventrale moderately wide; tergite IX (Fig. 14D) rounded at posterior edge, with numerous setae posteriorly; ventral sclerite (Fig. 14E) subtriangular, with deep Ω-shaped emargination at posterior edge, a few small sensillae located on posterior corners near emargination, small asperities present in posterior part; valvifer (Fig. 14D) with 1 lateral seta; coxite with 3 subapical setae, 1 basolateral seta and some much finer surface seta; stylus (Fig. 14D) long, cylindrical, with 1 long seta. Distribution. China (Xinjiang), Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan.Published as part of Wang, Cheng-Bin & Zhou, Hong-Zhang, 2016, Sinocatops gen. nov., an apterous genus of Cholevini (Coleoptera: Leiodidae: Cholevinae) from China, with emphasis on differences with allied Rybinskiella Reitter, 1906, pp. 393-415 in Zootaxa 4085 (3) on pages 407-410, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4085.3.4, http://zenodo.org/record/105264
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
The present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
Variations on the Author
“Variations on the Author” discusses two of Eduardo Coutinho’s recent films (Um Dia na Vida, from 2010, and Últimas Conversas, posthumously released in 2015) and their contribution to the general question of documentary authorship. The director’s filmography is characterized by a consistent yet self-effacing form of authorial self-inscription: Coutinho often features as an interviewer that rather than express opinions propels discourses; an interviewer that is good at listening. This mode of self-inscription characterizes him as an author who is not expressive but who is nonetheless markedly present on the screen. In Um Dia na Vida, however, Coutinho is completely absent form the image, while Últimas Conversas, on the contrary, includes a confessional prologue that moves the director from the margins to the center of his films. This article examines the ways in which these works stand out in the filmography of a director who offers new insights into the notion of cinematic authorship
Appropriate Similarity Measures for Author Cocitation Analysis
We provide a number of new insights into the methodological discussion about author cocitation analysis. We first argue that the use of the Pearson correlation for measuring the similarity between authors’ cocitation profiles is not very satisfactory. We then discuss what kind of similarity measures may be used as an alternative to the Pearson correlation. We consider three similarity measures in particular. One is the well-known cosine. The other two similarity measures have not been used before in the bibliometric literature. Finally, we show by means of an example that our findings have a high practical relevance.information science;Pearson correlation;cosine;similarity measure;author cocitation analysis
Dispelling the Myths Behind First-author Citation Counts
We conducted a full-scale evaluative citation analysis study of scholars in the XML research field to explore just how different from each other author rankings resulting from different citation counting methods actually are, and to demonstrate the capability of emerging data and tools on the Web in supporting more realistic citation counting methods. Our results contest some common arguments for the continued
use of first-author citation counts in the evaluation of scholars, such as high correlations between author rankings by first-author citation counts and other citation
counting methods, and high costs of using more realistic citation counting methods that are not well-supported by the ISI databases. It is argued that increasingly available digital full text research papers make it possible for citation analysis studies to go beyond what the ISI databases have directly supported and to employ more
sophisticated methods
koamabayili/VECTRON-author-checklist: VECTRON author checklist
We have done our best to complete the author checklist relating to the use of animals in the hut study. Note that the objective for the hut study was to evaluate the IRS treatment applications for residual efficacy against Anopheles mosquitoes, including the local An. coluzzii mosquito population. Cows were only used to attract mosquitoes into the huts and no tests were carried out directly on the cows. The author checklist is intended for use with studies where experiments are carried out on animals, which is why we have had such difficulty in completing this for the hut study, as many of the questions do not relate to how the cows were used
Author-wise bibliometric analysis based on entropy.
Author-wise bibliometric analysis based on entropy.</p
- …
