2,649 research outputs found
C.J. Koch (1932 - )
Biographical, bibliographical, and literary historiography of Australian author C.J. Koch
Analysis of balanced rearrangements of chromosome 6 in acute leukemia: clustered breakpoints in q22-q23 and possible involvement of c-MYB in a new recurrent translocation, t(6;7)(q23;q32 through 36)
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Many clinically important oncogenes and tumor suppressor genes have been identified through analysis of recurrent chromosomal rearrangements in acute leukemia. The contribution of sporadic rearrangements to malignancy is less clear and few have been mapped in detail. In this study we investigated the significance of novel translocations and inversions of 6q in acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) and acute myeloid leukemia (AML).DESIGN-AND-METHODS: Breakpoints of balanced 6q rearrangements were mapped in sequential fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) experiments with BAC and PAC clones in 11 patients.RESULTS: Six of seven breakpoints in ALL and two in a single case of AML were localized to within a 10.5 Mb hotspot at 6q22-q23 with five analyzed to the level of a single probe. In two cases of childhood T-ALL, both carrying a t(6;7)(q23;q32 through 36), split FISH signals were produced by adjacent PAC, mapping the breakpoints to within an approximately 150 Kb region containing the genes c-MYB and AHI1. Five similar rearrangements, four also in pediatric T ALL were identified in the literature. Other 6q22-q23 translocations mapped in detail interrupted regions containing no recognized genes. 6q breakpoints outside the q22-q23 region were widely dispersed and in two were mapped to positions overlapping the cloned fragile sites FRA6E and FRA6F. The involvement of MLL was demonstrated in one case with t(6;11)(q15;q23).INTERPRETATION-AND-CONCLUSIONS: We identified a new primary recurrent translocation t(6;7) (q22;q23 through q26) in pediatric T-ALL. Other translocations interrupting the 6q22-q23 breakpoint cluster region did not appear to be recurrent and may contribute to leukemogenesis through a novel mechanism
Safety and Tolerability of Pharmacological Treatment of Alcohol Dependence: Comprehensive Review of Evidence
Alcohol use disorders (AUD) cause significant morbidity and mortality worldwide, but pharmacological treatments for them are underused, despite evidence of efficacy. Acamprosate, naltrexone, nalmefene and disulfiram are all approved in one or more region for the treatment of alcohol use disorders. Baclofen currently has a temporary indication in France. Safety considerations for using psychopharmacological treatments in this patient group include the impact of concurrent alcohol consumption at high levels, multiple physical comorbidities which may interfere with pharmacological effects, distribution and metabolism, and concomitant medication for the treatment of comorbid physical and psychiatric conditions. The five drugs, including an extended-release injectable suspension of naltrexone, have different safety profiles which need to be balanced with the objective of treatment (initiation or continuation of abstinence, or reduction of drinking), individual patient preferences and comorbid conditions. Appropriate treatment will be based on the unique risk- benefit profile in each case.<br/
The brothers Singer The English language novels of I.J. Sinclair and their influence upon I.B. Sinclair
SIGLELD:D48507/84 / BLDSC - British Library Document Supply CentreGBUnited Kingdo
Audio Interview with Mr. C.J. Rayner Whiteley
Audio - Mr. Whiteley recounts the story of delivering the message of the flood of 1904. He took seventeen hours by horse to travel from Perryvale to Edmonton. Billy Loutit took the same message by foot arriving in Edmonton about the same time. Mr. Whiteley discusses early settlers, farming, homesteading and businesses. He has many anecdotes about life and people living in Athabasca at the start of the twentieth century. He freighted for ten years with the Hudson's Bay Company and also discusses early farming prices and technology extensivelyInformative Interview of Mr. C.J. Raymor Whitely In April 1961 on a Reel to Reel tape recorded onto cassette by R. Tanhas March 198
Data pre-processing/model initialisation in neurofuzzy modelling of structure-property relationships in Al-Zn-Mg-Cu alloys
The paper deals with the application of multiple linear regression and neurofuzzy modelling approaches to 7xxx series based aluminium alloys. 36 compositional and ageing time variants and subsequent proof strength and electrical conductivity measurements have been studied. The input datasets have been transformed in two ways: to reveal more explicit microstructural information and to reflect some empirical findings in the literature. Neurofuzzy modelling exhibited improved performance in modelling proof strength and electrical conductivity cf. the multiple linear regression approach. Electrical conductivity is best modelled using the explicit microstructural input dataset, whilst proof strength is best modelled by a further modification of this dataset, decided upon after inspection of the subnetwork structures produced by neurofuzzy modelling. Neurofuzzy modelling offers a transparent empirically based data-driven approach that can be combined with pre-processing of the data and initialising of the model structure based upon physical understanding. An iterative modelling approach is defined whereby data-driven empirical modelling approaches are first used to assess underlying data structures and are validated against physically based understanding, these then inform subsequent initialised neurofuzzy models and input data transformations to provide both optimal subset and feature representation
Relationship between nondestructive firmness measurements and commercially important ripening fruit stages for peaches, nectarines and plums
Fruit firmness measurement is a good way to monitor fruit softening and to predict bruising damage during harvest and postharvest handling. Ripening protocols traditionally utilize a destructive penetrometer-type fruit firmness measure to monitor ripening. Until recently, methods of assessing fruit texture properties nondestructively were not commercially available. The nondestructive Sinclair iQ™ firmness tester was investigated to monitor ripening and predict bruising susceptibility in stone fruit. This work was carried out on four peach, three plum, and five nectarine cultivars over two seasons. The correlations between destructive and nondestructive firmness measurements were significant (p-value = 0.0001), although too low for commercial applications as they varied from r2 = 0.60–0.71 according to fruit type. Using a different approach, the relationship between destructive and nondestructive firmness measures was characterized in terms of segregating these fruit according to their stages of ripening. This was done by using discriminant analysis (66–90% agreement in ripeness stage classification was observed in validation tests). Discriminant analysis consistently segregated nondestructive firmness measured fruit into commercially important classes (“ready to eat”, “ready to buy”, “mature and immature”). These represented key ripening stages with different bruising potentials and consumer acceptance. This work points out the importance to relate nondestructive measurements directly to important commercial physiological stages rather than to correlate them with the current standard penetrometer values. Thus, destructive and nondestructive firmness measurements can be directly used to identify the stage of ripeness and potential susceptibility to bruising during postharvest changes. Further work is recommended to evaluate the performance of this nondestructive sensor in segregating fruit according to their stage of ripeness under packinghouse or processing plant conditions
Specialty farming in Idaho: Selecting a site
Bulletin no. 744 Moscow, Idaho :University of Idaho, College of Agriculture, Cooperative Extension System, 1992-10-01. Author(s): Barney, D.L.; Finnerty, T.L.; Mancuso, C.J
The Actors' Perceptions and Expectations of their Roles in BIM-based Collaboration
The inter-organisational collaboration with Building Information Modelling (BIM) is one of the hottest topics in construction sector nowadays. The implementation of BIM is a complex inter-organisational process, and the sharing of information among numerous actors from multi-disciplinary backgrounds may affect the actors’ role perception and performance. This study offers insights into the BIM roles of various actors by analysing a BIM-based project carried out by an integrated partnership across many tiers. The analysis identified inconsistencies between the actors' perceptions and their partners’ expectations of their BIM roles. Inconsistencies in BIM roles were more related to soft rather than hard (domain- or technical) skills. Mismatches were found in the architect's role, as it was deemed necessary to be more domain- and BIM-related, contrary to their perceptions. Likewise, the suppliers' role called for an enhanced BIM orientation. The paper concludes with set of suggestions for increasing the joint responsibility and supporting the multi-actor collaboration.Design & Construction ManagementSustainable Housing Transformatio
Iteaphila longipalpis Sinclair & Shamshev 2021, comb. nov.
<i>Iteaphila longipalpis</i> (Melander) comb. nov. <p>(Figs 8, 48, 64)</p> <p> <i>Anthepiscopus longipalpis</i> Melander, 1928: 106. Type locality: Arlington, Washington, USA.</p> <p> <i>Anthepiscopus longipalpis</i>: Melander, 1965: 455.</p> <p> <b>Type material examined.</b> <b>HOLOTYPE</b> ♀, labelled: “Arlington [48°10′52″N 122°8′20″W]/ 5.21.[190]8Was”; “window”; “ TYPE / Anthepiscopus / longipalpis/ Mel. [red label]”; “ALMelander/ Collection/ 1961” (USNM).</p> <p> <b>Additional material examined.</b> <b>CANADA. Alberta:</b> Banff NP [51.5°N 116.0°W], 14 mi W Banff, <i>Ledum groenlandicum</i>, 7.vii.1955, GES (1 ♀, CNC); Banff NP, 26 km N Lk. Louise, trib. Mosquito Ck [51°37′N 116°19′W], 28.vi.1989, BJS (1 ♂, CNC). <b>British Columbia:</b> 37 km W Anahim Lake [52°24′N 125°14′W], 6.vii.1992, A. Borkent (2 ♂, CNC); same data except, 48 km NW, 14.vii.1992 (1 ♂, CNC); Cowichan Lk. [48°49′N 124°02′W], 19.vi.1964, J.A. Clapman (2 ♀, CNC); Cultus Lk. [49°04′N 121°58′W], 24.v.1965, F. Schmid (1 ♂, 1 ♀, CNC); Galiano Is. [48°55′N 123°25′W], Spanish Hills, 29.iv.1979, 9.v.1982, G.G.E. Scudder (3 ♀, UBCZ); Kilimat [54°03′17″N 128°39′28″W], 2.vi.1960, JGC (2 ♀, CNC); same data except, 30.vi.1960, GES (1 ♂, CNC); King Salmon Lk., 58°43′N 132°54′W, 15.vii.1960, R. Pilfrey (1 ♀, CNC); Kitsumkalum Lk. [54°43′22″N 128°46′34″W], 20 mi N Terrace, 31.v., 16.vi.1960, JGC (1 ♂, 1 ♀, CNC); Kleanza Ck [54°36′05″N 128°24′11″W], 14 mi E Terrace, 17.vi., 4.vii.1960, CHM (2 ♀, CNC); same data except, 19.vii.1960, W. R. Richards (2 ♀, CNC); same data except, 29.vi., 4.vii.1960, JGC (1 ♀, CNC); same data except, 17.vi.1960, B. Pilfrey (1 ♀, CNC); Mission City [49°2′30″N 122°14′41″W], 3 and 9.vi.1953, W. R.M. Mason (2 ♂, 1 ♀, CNC); Mt. Allard, 23 mi N Terrace, 11.viii.1960, CHM 1 ♀, CNC); Mt. Thornhill, nr Terrace [54°30′44″N 128°32′18″W], 21.vi., 14.vii.1960, JGC (1 ♂, 7 ♀, CNC); same data except, 14 and 26.vii.1960, B. Heming (1 ♂, 1 ♀, CNC); same data except, 14.vii.1960, CHM (1 ♀, CNC); 8 km E Sicamous [50°53′N 118°54′W], 22.v.1992, AB (1 ♀, CNC); 24 km NE Sicamous, 19.v.1991, AB (1 ♀, CNC); 13 km SE Port Renfrew [48°30′N 124°18′W], 5.vii.1991, AB (4 ♀, CNC); Squamish, Diamond Head Tr. [49°45′N 123°03′W], 4000 ft, 28.viii.1953, GJS (1 ♀, CNC); same data except, 3500 ft, 5.viii.1953, E. Mason (1 ♂, CNC); 10 mi N Terrace, Glacier Ck, 7.vii.1960, JGC (7 ♀, CNC); 32 mi SW Terrace, 4–6.vi.1960, GES (2 ♀, CNC); same data except, 6.vi.1960, R. Pilfrey (1 ♀, CNC); Vancouver Is., Lk. Cowichan, 48°49′N 124°03′W, 28.vi.1983, J.A. Downes (1 ♀, CNC). <b>Yukon:</b> North Fork Crossing, mi 42 Peel Plateau Rd. [64°27′N 138°17′W], 3500 ft, 24.vi.1962, PJS (1 ♀, CNC). <b>USA. Alaska:</b> Isabel Pass [63°12′42″N 145°29′17″W], mi 206 Richardson Hwy, 2900 ft, 15.vi.1962, PJS (1 ♀, CNC); Thane [58°15′51″N 134°19′49″W], 1.viii.1952, WCF (1 ♀, WSU); White Pass [59°28′47″N 135°15′22″W], 10 mi Skagway, 30.vii.1996, PHA & MA (3 ♀, USNM). <b>Oregon:</b> Benton Co., Mary’s Peak Cpgd, Meadow Edge Tr., along Upper Parker Ck, 44°30′32.8″N 123°33′36.0″W, 1077 m, 4.vii.2014, JMC (1 ♂, CNC); Clackamas Co., Mt. Hood NF, Tollgate Cpgd [45°19′21″N 121°54′24″W], 22.vi.1977, DDW (8 ♀, CAS); Clackamas Co., Bruin Run Ck, Camp Ck Cpgd [45°18′16″N 121°52′02″W], 24.vi.1974, PHA (2 ♀, CAS); Clackamas Co., Mt. Hood NF, Still Ck Cpgd, 45°17.703′N 121°44.313′W, 1150 m, 9.vii.2013, BJS (1 ♀, CNC); Marion Co., Silver Falls SP, 23 and 24.vi.1974, PHA (7 ♀, CAS); Marion Co., Willamette NF, French Ck Rd., 44°45.969′N 122°11.211′W, 660 m, 10.vii.2013, BJS (1 ♀, CNC). <b>Washington:</b> Clallam Co., Olympic NF, Klahowya SP [48°03′52″N 124°06′41″W], Soleduck R., 30.vi.1974, PHA (1 ♀, CAS); Clallam Co., Olympic NP, meadow below Sunrise Ridge, Mt. Angeles [47°59′40″N 123°27′59″W], 1550 m, 22 and 24.vii.1978, DDW (4 ♂, CAS); same data except, Lake Creek, 24.vii.1978 (9 ♀, CAS); Clallam Co., Beaver Lk., 5 km NE Sappho, 48°06′51″N 124°14′40″W, 7.vi.2004, C.J. Borkent (4 ♀, CNC); Clallam Co., Olympic NP, nr. Fairholm Cpgd, 48°04′12″N 123°55′7.5″W, 24.vi.2005, C.J. Borkent (1 ♀, LEM); same data except, CNC161443, CNC161444, CNC161445, CNC161446 (1 ♂, 3 ♀, barcoded, LEM); Everett [47°58′45″N 122°12′06″W], 20.vi.1920, A Spuler (6 ♀, WSU); Everett, 19.vi.1920, 4.vii.1924, ALM (1 ♂, 27 ♀, USNM); Ilwaco [46°18′45″N 124°1′47″W], 5.v.1918, ALM (1 ♀, USNM); King Co., Seattle, Issaquah [47°32′8″N 122°2′36″W], 23.vii.1988, R. Danielsson (1 ♀, MZLU); King Co., 5.5 km W Greenwater, nr Federation Forest SP, Jct Hwy 410 & W-6300, 47°09′28″N 121°43′40″W, 515 m, 25.vi.2005, C.J. Borkent (1 ♀, LEM); Lewis Co., trib. Catt Ck, 2847 ft, 46°41′53″N 121°57′46″W, 16.vi.2018, JMC (1 ♂, 1 ♀, CNC); Lewis Co., stream at mi 9 Skate Ck Rd, 2460 ft, 46°43′32.01″N 121°49′51″W, 15.vi.2018, JMC (1 ♂, 2 ♀, CNC); Lewis Co., Knuppenburg Lk., 17 km ENE Packwood, Hwy 12, 1260 m, 46°37′46″N 121°24′57″W, 11.vi.2004, C.J. Borkent (1 ♀, LEM); Mason Co., 16 kmW Lilliwaup, Staircase, Olympic NP, N Fk Skokomish R., 47°31′06″N 123°19′58″W, 280 m, 10.vi.2004, C.J. Borkent (1 ♀, LEM); Mt. Constitution [48°40′39″N 122°49′52″W], 17.v.1910 (2 ♀, UNSM); Mt. Baker, Skyline Tr [48°52′51″N 121°51′52″W], 10.viii.1925, ALM (3 ♀, USNM); Mt. Rainier, Van Trump Ck [46°47′34″N 121°46′33″W],. ix.1917, ALM (1 ♀, USNM); Mt. Rainier NP, nr Cougar Cpgd [46°46′03″N 121°47′39″W], 8.vii.1989, BJS (2 ♀, CNC); Mt. Rainer NP, ck nr White River Cpgd [46°54′09″N 121°38′28″W], 1340 m, 3.viii.1977, DDW (2 ♂, CAS); same data except, Fish Ck, West Side Rd, 910 m, 1.viii.1977 (4 ♀, CAS); same data except, along Sunbeam Ck above Louise Lk. [46°46′16″N 121°43′23″W], 1520 m, 4.viii.1977 (1 ♀, CAS); Mt. Rainier NP, Narada Falls to Reflection Lk. Tr., 46°46′N 121°44′W, 1400 m, 17.vii.2012, BJS (1 ♂, 10 ♀, CNC); same data except, CNC197570, CNC197571, CNC197572 (2 ♂, 1 ♀, barcoded, CNC); same data except, ex. <i>Erythronium montanum</i> (1 ♂, CNC); same data except, Westside Rd nr. Fish Ck, 46°46.743′N 121°53.069′W, 880 m, 4.vii.2013 (1 ♂, 16 ♀, CNC); same data except, Stevens Ck Tr., 46°45.338′N 121°38.530′W, 1400 m, 17.vii.2012 (1 ♀, CNC); Mt. Rainier NP, Longmire Tr., marsh W Inn, 46°44′56″N 121°48′51″W, 850 m, 25.vi.2005, C.J. Borkent (2 ♀, LEM); Olympia [47°2′16″N 122°54′3″W], 22.vi.1920, ALM (1 ♂, 2 ♀, USNM); Olympic NP, Sol Due River [47°58′00″N 123°51′28″W], 6.vii.1978, D.E. Hardy (1 ♀, WSU); Pluvius [46°32′53″N 123°24′32″W], 10.vii.1917, ALM (1 ♀, USNM); Tacoma [47°14′29″N 122°27′34″W], 27.v.1917, ALM (1 ♂, USNM); Vashon [47°24′58″N 122°28′6″W], 28.v.1917, ALM (2 ♂, 11 ♀, USNM). <b>Wyoming:</b> Sheridan Co., Black Mtn [44°44′17″N 107°23′16″W], pine forest, ypans, dung, 5–20.vii.1990, J. Swann (1 ♂, 11 ♀, DEBU); Teton Co., Togowte Pass [43°45′00″N 110°04′48″W], 9000 ft, 22.vii.1953, R. R. Driesbach (1 ♂, CNC).</p> <p> <b>Possible additional material.</b> <b>USA. California:</b> Placer Co., E end Bear Valley [39°18′34″N 120°39′54″W], 1.vi.1964, PHA (2 ♀, CAS).</p> <p> <b>Recognition.</b> This species is distinguished by 4-serial acrostichal setae, thinly pruinescent scutum with dark chaetotaxy, elongate mouthparts, pale legs and features of the male terminalia (hypoproct process extending beyond cercus; narrow, upright surstylus) (Fig. 48).</p> <p> <b>Redescription.</b> Wing length 3.2–3.8 mm. <b>Male</b> (Fig. 8). Head dark brown in ground-colour, with pale brown to black setation, occiput thinly to densely greyish pollinose. Eyes holoptic, with upper ommatidia enlarged. Frons represented by small triangular space just above antennae, bare, greyish pollinose. Ocellar triangle prominent, with 2 pairs of long hair-like setae. Postvertical setae subequal to postocular setae, thin; occiput covered with numerous similar setae in lower part, pale brown posterior to mouthparts. Antenna dark brown; scape short, slightly shorter than globular pedicel, both with short setae; postpedicel rather narrow, nearly 4 times longer than basal width, base somewhat expanded and smoothly tapered; stylus <i>ca</i> 3–4 times longer than wide, sensillum-tipped; segment 9 tubular, 2–3 times longer than wide, apical sensillum about as long as segment 9. Proboscis very long, projected obliquely; labium longer than head height; palpus slender, projected parallel to labrum, somewhat shorter than labrum.</p> <p>Thorax dark brown in ground-colour with posterior part of postpronotal lobe and postalar tubercle often paler, with brown to black setation; scutum viewed dorsally entirely velvety brown, slightly matt, without vittae; viewed anteriorly densely pruinose; mesopleuron uniformly greyish brown pollinose. Proepisternum with a few hair-like setae. Postpronotal lobe with 1 long thin and several shorter setae. Mesonotal setae distinct, thin; acr 4-serial, arranged in 2 pairs of closely spaced irregular rows, lacking on prescutellar depression, distance between paired rows wider than length of acr; dc uniserial (with some additional setulae in anterior part), offset from row anteriorly, slightly longer than acr, 2–3 distinct prescutellar dc; 1 ph, 1 presut spal (sometimes with additional setulae), 3–4 npl (with a few additional shorter setae), several psut spal setulae, 1 pal and several short setulae, 6–7 pairs of sctl.</p> <p>Legs pale yellow to yellowish brown, coxae and tarsi somewhat darker. Coxae and trochanters with unmodified hair-like setae. Fore femur with row of short anteroventral hair-like setae, especially distinct apically; and somewhat longer setae on posteroventral, dorsal and posterior faces. Mid femur with moderately long posteroventral bristly setae along entire length, bearing some moderately long setae on dorsal and posterior faces. Hind femur with long anteroventral and dorsal setae along whole length. Tibiae with row of slightly prominent thin posterodorsal setae. Tarsomere 1 of mid and hindlegs with pair of rows of stiff ventral setae; tarsomere 5 not flattened on all legs; pulvilli broad, shorter than tarsal claw.</p> <p> Wing distinctly uniformly pale infuscate; basal costal seta absent; pterostigma distinct brownish, elliptical, overlapping apex of R 1; anal lobe very prominent, acute. Sc complete; R 2+3 often slightly bowed posterior to pterostigma; R 4+5 unbranched; cell dm broad, longer than basal cells, truncate apically; base of M 2 (crossvein) more than one-third length of dm-m, M branches widely separated; dm-m crossvein slightly concave. Apex of cell cua recurved; CuA+CuP long, pale, ending short of wing margin. Halter with brown knob, base of shaft paler.</p> <p>Abdomen brown, subshiny, finely brownish grey pollinose, basal 4 segments paler; covered with long mostly yellowish setae, setae dark or pale on apical segments. Terminalia (Fig. 48) concolorous with abdomen, large. Hypandrium with numerous short setae, rounded basally, narrowed apically with narrow, folded apex, with roughened posterior apex; gonocoxal apodeme long and expanded apically; inner apodeme expanded and flattened, slightly longer than length of gonocoxal apodeme; postgonite long, flattened plate, arched, truncate apically with lateral projection. Phallic guide extended well beyond epandrium, parallel with phallus and bent nearly at right angles subapically; bent apical section paired with jagged or toothed surface apically; apex rounded. Epandrium not inflated laterally; dorsal bridge narrow; produced distally into slender, dorsally projecting, slightly curved surstylus; inner margin of surstylus with short tooth-like projection medially. Phallus slender, arched well beyond epandrium, bent more than right angles subapically; apical section sickle-shaped, tapered and very slender; ejaculatory apodeme plate-like, rounded, greatly expanded anteriorly, nearly twice length of gonocoxal apodeme. Cercus short, triangular, one-third length of epandrium; narrowed apically with apex pointed, extended free from epandrium; hypoproct produced into pair of very long, slender processes, longer than cercus.</p> <p> <b>Female.</b> Similar to male, except as follows: Eyes dichoptic; ommatidia equally small. Frons very broad, somewhat widened toward ocellar tubercle, shiny to thinly pruinescent, with marginal setulae. Scutum pruinescent. Scutellum pruinose, usually with 5–6 pairs of setae. Legs similar to male. Abdomen with shorter, less prominent pale setae. Cercus brownish, long, slender, covered with brownish setae.</p> <p> <b>Distribution.</b> Nearctic: Canada (Alberta, British Columbia, Yukon), USA (Alaska, Oregon, Washington, Wyoming). This species is confined to the western Cordillera of North America from Alaska and Yukon to Wyoming, with most records along the northern Pacific Coast Ranges (Fig. 64).</p> <p> <b>Remarks.</b> This species is very similar to <i>I. sierrensis</i> <b>sp. nov.</b> and <i>I. flavipilosa</i> in terms of male terminalia, but is distinguished by the different lengths of the phallus and phallic guide and orientation and shape of the surstylus.</p>Published as part of <i>Sinclair, Bradley J. & Shamshev, Igor V., 2021, World revision of Iteaphila with unbranched radial vein (Diptera: Empidoidea: Iteaphilidae), pp. 1-89 in Zootaxa 4968 (1)</i> on pages 49-51, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4968.1.1, <a href="http://zenodo.org/record/4745566">http://zenodo.org/record/4745566</a>
- …
