1,720,954 research outputs found
TIME ANALYSIS OF THE GIANT SLALOM TURN IN SNOWBOARDING
No full textINTRODUCTION:Snowboarding is an increasingly popular sport, but it has been little studied so far, especially regarding the biomechanical characteristics (1). Most previous research concerned injury occurrence, the physiological profile of the snowboarding athletes (1) and dynamic variables characterizing the turn (2,3). Therefore, the aim of this study was to compare the turn technique of the snowboard giant slalom between elite and experienced recreational athletes, to improve the knowledge of performance factors and to provide suggestions to athletes and coaches.
METHODS: Eight male snowboarders, four belonging to the Italian Snowboard National Team (EA, age 27±3.2y, height 1.80±0.10 m,
mass 83.4±4.3 kg) and four experienced recreational athletes (RA, age 41.5±5.5 y, height 1.76±0.03 m, mass 89.0±12.2 kg) were analyzed during two performance on a snowboard slope (14 gates spaced at 21 m, 200m total descent). Eight wearable inertial and magnetic measurement units (APDM Opals, 128 Hz) were used for data collection. The sensors were fixed on sternum, sacrum, thigh, leg, toe of ski boot (right and left). Snowboarders were filmed when passing through the first 4 gates using a video camera (JVC full HD, 250hz) to compare the video recordings and the inertial sensor signal, and to define an algorithm to identifies automatically the transition of the gate and the change of the ski edge of all turns. These events were used to divide the turn in 4 phases: from change of ski edge to gate (T1) and from gate to change of ski edge (T2). Each event was identified for the backside-B and frontside-F turn, defining this way T1B, T2B, T1F, T2F respectively.
RESULTS: Concerning time variables, EA showed shorter and more consistent times than RA in all turn phases (T1B 0.89±0.18s vs
0.99±0.11s, T2B 0.97±0.21s vs 1.53±0.50s, T1F 0.65±0.19s vs 1.23±0.3s, T2F 0.97±0.19s vs 1.31±0.22s), with significant differences (p<0.05) for all comparisons, with the exception of T1B. Also, the times of the total turn in B (0.92±0.19s vs 1.24±0.44s in EA and RA respectively) and in F (0.78±0.21s vs 1.25±0.24s in EA and RA respectively) were significantly shorter in EA than RA (p=0.03 and p=0.001 for B and F, respectively). T1 was shorter than T2 both in B and in F, but this difference was not statistically significant.
CONCLUSION: As expected, EA completed all the phases of the turn more quickly than RA. This difference was noticeable during the F
turn, especially in the T1 phase, more evidently than in B. In fact, as confirmed by the coaches of the Italian National Team, to perform an
optimal F technique, highly developed technical skills are needed. Moreover, EA showed, for all variables, a lower variability and a higher
repeatability than RA. The results of this study suggest that, in attempt to improve the performance, it is overall necessary to enhance F
technical skills.
1) Vernillo et al., Frontiers in Physiology (2018)
2) Hirose et al., Procedia Engineering, (2012).
3) Kondo et al., Procedia Engineering, (2014)
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
Full text linkThe present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
Variations on the Author
Full text link“Variations on the Author” discusses two of Eduardo Coutinho’s recent films (Um Dia na Vida, from 2010, and Últimas Conversas, posthumously released in 2015) and their contribution to the general question of documentary authorship. The director’s filmography is characterized by a consistent yet self-effacing form of authorial self-inscription: Coutinho often features as an interviewer that rather than express opinions propels discourses; an interviewer that is good at listening. This mode of self-inscription characterizes him as an author who is not expressive but who is nonetheless markedly present on the screen. In Um Dia na Vida, however, Coutinho is completely absent form the image, while Últimas Conversas, on the contrary, includes a confessional prologue that moves the director from the margins to the center of his films. This article examines the ways in which these works stand out in the filmography of a director who offers new insights into the notion of cinematic authorship
Appropriate Similarity Measures for Author Cocitation Analysis
Full text linkWe provide a number of new insights into the methodological discussion about author cocitation analysis. We first argue that the use of the Pearson correlation for measuring the similarity between authors’ cocitation profiles is not very satisfactory. We then discuss what kind of similarity measures may be used as an alternative to the Pearson correlation. We consider three similarity measures in particular. One is the well-known cosine. The other two similarity measures have not been used before in the bibliometric literature. Finally, we show by means of an example that our findings have a high practical relevance.information science;Pearson correlation;cosine;similarity measure;author cocitation analysis
Dispelling the Myths Behind First-author Citation Counts
Full text linkWe conducted a full-scale evaluative citation analysis study of scholars in the XML research field to explore just how different from each other author rankings resulting from different citation counting methods actually are, and to demonstrate the capability of emerging data and tools on the Web in supporting more realistic citation counting methods. Our results contest some common arguments for the continued
use of first-author citation counts in the evaluation of scholars, such as high correlations between author rankings by first-author citation counts and other citation
counting methods, and high costs of using more realistic citation counting methods that are not well-supported by the ISI databases. It is argued that increasingly available digital full text research papers make it possible for citation analysis studies to go beyond what the ISI databases have directly supported and to employ more
sophisticated methods
koamabayili/VECTRON-author-checklist: VECTRON author checklist
No full textWe have done our best to complete the author checklist relating to the use of animals in the hut study. Note that the objective for the hut study was to evaluate the IRS treatment applications for residual efficacy against Anopheles mosquitoes, including the local An. coluzzii mosquito population. Cows were only used to attract mosquitoes into the huts and no tests were carried out directly on the cows. The author checklist is intended for use with studies where experiments are carried out on animals, which is why we have had such difficulty in completing this for the hut study, as many of the questions do not relate to how the cows were used
Author-wise bibliometric analysis based on entropy.
No full textAuthor-wise bibliometric analysis based on entropy.</p
Author Under Sail The Imagination of Jack London, 1893-1902
No full textIn Author Under Sail, Jay Williams offers the first complete literary biography of Jack London as a professional writer engaged in the labor of writing. It examines the authorial imagination in London's work, the use of imagination in both his fiction and nonfiction, and the ways he defined imagination in the creative process in his business dealings with his publishers, editors, and agents. In this first volume of a two-volume biography, Williams traverses the years 1893 to 1902, from London's "Story of a Typhoon" to The People of the Abyss. The Jack London who emerges in the pages of Author Under Sail is a writer whose partnership with publishers, most notably his productive alliance with George Brett of Macmillan, was one of the most formative in American literary history. London pioneered many author models during the heyday of realism and naturalism, blurring the boundaries of these popular genres by focusing on absorption and theatricality and the representation of the seen and unseen. London created an impassioned, sincere, and extremely personal realism unlike that of other American writers of the time. Author Under Sail is a literary tour de force that reveals the full range of London as writer, creative citizen, and entrepreneur at the same time it sheds light on the maverick side of machine-age literature.Intro -- Title Page -- Copyright Page -- Dedication -- Contents -- Acknowledgments -- Introduction -- 1. Spirit Truth -- 2. From Absorption to Theatricality and Back Again -- 3. "I Will Build a New Present" -- 4. Sons as Authors -- 5. Fathers as Publishers -- 6. The Daughter as Author -- 7. Lovers as Authors -- 8. At Sea with the Family -- 9. Yellow News, Yellow Stories -- 10. The Return Home -- Notes -- Bibliography -- Index -- About Jay WilliamsIn Author Under Sail, Jay Williams offers the first complete literary biography of Jack London as a professional writer engaged in the labor of writing. It examines the authorial imagination in London's work, the use of imagination in both his fiction and nonfiction, and the ways he defined imagination in the creative process in his business dealings with his publishers, editors, and agents. In this first volume of a two-volume biography, Williams traverses the years 1893 to 1902, from London's "Story of a Typhoon" to The People of the Abyss. The Jack London who emerges in the pages of Author Under Sail is a writer whose partnership with publishers, most notably his productive alliance with George Brett of Macmillan, was one of the most formative in American literary history. London pioneered many author models during the heyday of realism and naturalism, blurring the boundaries of these popular genres by focusing on absorption and theatricality and the representation of the seen and unseen. London created an impassioned, sincere, and extremely personal realism unlike that of other American writers of the time. Author Under Sail is a literary tour de force that reveals the full range of London as writer, creative citizen, and entrepreneur at the same time it sheds light on the maverick side of machine-age literature.Description based on publisher supplied metadata and other sources.Electronic reproduction. Ann Arbor, Michigan : ProQuest Ebook Central, YYYY. Available via World Wide Web. Access may be limited to ProQuest Ebook Central affiliated libraries
- …
