1,720,958 research outputs found
Insights from DCE-MRI:blood–brain barrier permeability in the context of MS relapses and methylprednisolone treatment
Background: Detecting multiple sclerosis (MS) relapses remains challenging due to symptom variability and confounding factors, such as flare-ups and infections. Methylprednisolone (MP) is used for severe relapses, decreasing the number of contrast-enhancing lesions on MRI. The influx constant (Ki) derived from dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI (DCE-MRI), a marker of blood–brain barrier (BBB) permeability, has shown promise as a predictor of disease activity in relapsing–remitting MS (RRMS).Objectives: To investigate the predictive value of Ki in relation to clinical MS relapses and MP treatment, comparing its performance with traditional MRI markers.Methods: We studied 20 RRMS subjects admitted for possible relapse, using DCE-MRI on admission to assess Ki in normal-appearing white matter (NAWM) via the Patlak model. Mixed-effects modeling compared the predictive accuracy of Ki, the presence of contrast-enhancing lesions (CEL), evidence of brain lesions (EBL; defined as the presence of CEL or new T2 lesions), and MP treatment on clinical relapse events. Five models were evaluated, including combinations of Ki, CEL, EBL, and MP, to determine the most robust predictors of clinical relapse. Model performance was assessed using accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV), with bootstrapped confidence intervals.Results: Superior predictive accuracy was demonstrated with the inclusion of EBL and Ki, alongside MP treatment (AIC = 66.12, p = 0.006), outperforming other models with a classification accuracy of 83% (CI: 73–92%), sensitivity of 78% (CI: 60–94%), and specificity of 86% (CI: 74–97%). This model showed the highest combined PPV (78%, CI: 60–94%) and NPV (86%, CI: 74–98%) compared to models with EBL or CEL alone, suggesting an added value of Ki in enhancing predictive reliability.Conclusion: These results support the use of Ki alongside conventional MRI imaging metrics, to improve clinical relapse prediction in RRMS. The findings underscore the utility of Ki as a marker of MS-related neuroinflammation, with potential for integration into relapse monitoring protocols. Further validation in larger cohorts is recommended to confirm the model’s generalizability and clinical application.Background: Detecting multiple sclerosis (MS) relapses remains challenging due to symptom variability and confounding factors, such as flare-ups and infections. Methylprednisolone (MP) is used for severe relapses, decreasing the number of contrast-enhancing lesions on MRI. The influx constant (Ki) derived from dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI (DCE-MRI), a marker of blood–brain barrier (BBB) permeability, has shown promise as a predictor of disease activity in relapsing–remitting MS (RRMS). Objectives: To investigate the predictive value of Ki in relation to clinical MS relapses and MP treatment, comparing its performance with traditional MRI markers. Methods: We studied 20 RRMS subjects admitted for possible relapse, using DCE-MRI on admission to assess Ki in normal-appearing white matter (NAWM) via the Patlak model. Mixed-effects modeling compared the predictive accuracy of Ki, the presence of contrast-enhancing lesions (CEL), evidence of brain lesions (EBL; defined as the presence of CEL or new T2 lesions), and MP treatment on clinical relapse events. Five models were evaluated, including combinations of Ki, CEL, EBL, and MP, to determine the most robust predictors of clinical relapse. Model performance was assessed using accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV), with bootstrapped confidence intervals. Results: Superior predictive accuracy was demonstrated with the inclusion of EBL and Ki, alongside MP treatment (AIC = 66.12, p = 0.006), outperforming other models with a classification accuracy of 83% (CI: 73–92%), sensitivity of 78% (CI: 60–94%), and specificity of 86% (CI: 74–97%). This model showed the highest combined PPV (78%, CI: 60–94%) and NPV (86%, CI: 74–98%) compared to models with EBL or CEL alone, suggesting an added value of Ki in enhancing predictive reliability. Conclusion: These results support the use of Ki alongside conventional MRI imaging metrics, to improve clinical relapse prediction in RRMS. The findings underscore the utility of Ki as a marker of MS-related neuroinflammation, with potential for integration into relapse monitoring protocols. Further validation in larger cohorts is recommended to confirm the model’s generalizability and clinical application.</p
Permeability of the blood-brain barrier predicts no evidence of disease activity at two years after natalizumab or fingolimod treatment in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis
OBJECTIVE: To investigate if blood-brain barrier (BBB) permeability, as measured by dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI), can provide early detection of sub-optimal treatment response in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS).METHODS: 35 RRMS patients starting on fingolimod or natalizumab, drugs with a common effect of decreasing lymphocyte influx into the CNS, were scanned with DCE-MRI at 3T prior to treatment and at three and six-months post-treatment. We calculated the influx constant Ki , a measure of BBB permeability, using the Patlak model. Sub-optimal treatment response was defined as loss of no evidence of disease activity (NEDA-3) status after two years of treatment.RESULTS: Subjects with loss of NEDA status at 2 years had a 51% higher mean Ki in normal-appearing white matter (NAWM) measured after six months of treatment, compared to subjects with maintained NEDA status (mean difference 0.06 (CI 0.02-0.09) ml/100g/min; p=0.002). Ki in NAWM at 6 months was a good predictor of loss of NEDA status at two years (AUC 0.84, CI 0.70-0.99; p=0.003) and a value above 0.136 ml/100/g/min yielded an odds ratio of 12.4 for sub-optimal treatment response at 2 years, with a sensitivity of 73% and a specificity of 82%.INTERPRETATION: Our results suggest that BBB permeability as measured by DCE-MRI reliably predicts sub-optimal treatment response and is a surrogate marker of the state of health of the BBB. We find a predictive threshold for disease activity, which is remarkably identical in clinically isolated syndrome as previously reported and established RRMS as investigated here
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
The present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
Variations on the Author
“Variations on the Author” discusses two of Eduardo Coutinho’s recent films (Um Dia na Vida, from 2010, and Últimas Conversas, posthumously released in 2015) and their contribution to the general question of documentary authorship. The director’s filmography is characterized by a consistent yet self-effacing form of authorial self-inscription: Coutinho often features as an interviewer that rather than express opinions propels discourses; an interviewer that is good at listening. This mode of self-inscription characterizes him as an author who is not expressive but who is nonetheless markedly present on the screen. In Um Dia na Vida, however, Coutinho is completely absent form the image, while Últimas Conversas, on the contrary, includes a confessional prologue that moves the director from the margins to the center of his films. This article examines the ways in which these works stand out in the filmography of a director who offers new insights into the notion of cinematic authorship
Appropriate Similarity Measures for Author Cocitation Analysis
We provide a number of new insights into the methodological discussion about author cocitation analysis. We first argue that the use of the Pearson correlation for measuring the similarity between authors’ cocitation profiles is not very satisfactory. We then discuss what kind of similarity measures may be used as an alternative to the Pearson correlation. We consider three similarity measures in particular. One is the well-known cosine. The other two similarity measures have not been used before in the bibliometric literature. Finally, we show by means of an example that our findings have a high practical relevance.information science;Pearson correlation;cosine;similarity measure;author cocitation analysis
Dispelling the Myths Behind First-author Citation Counts
We conducted a full-scale evaluative citation analysis study of scholars in the XML research field to explore just how different from each other author rankings resulting from different citation counting methods actually are, and to demonstrate the capability of emerging data and tools on the Web in supporting more realistic citation counting methods. Our results contest some common arguments for the continued
use of first-author citation counts in the evaluation of scholars, such as high correlations between author rankings by first-author citation counts and other citation
counting methods, and high costs of using more realistic citation counting methods that are not well-supported by the ISI databases. It is argued that increasingly available digital full text research papers make it possible for citation analysis studies to go beyond what the ISI databases have directly supported and to employ more
sophisticated methods
koamabayili/VECTRON-author-checklist: VECTRON author checklist
We have done our best to complete the author checklist relating to the use of animals in the hut study. Note that the objective for the hut study was to evaluate the IRS treatment applications for residual efficacy against Anopheles mosquitoes, including the local An. coluzzii mosquito population. Cows were only used to attract mosquitoes into the huts and no tests were carried out directly on the cows. The author checklist is intended for use with studies where experiments are carried out on animals, which is why we have had such difficulty in completing this for the hut study, as many of the questions do not relate to how the cows were used
Blood-brain barrier permeability changes in the first year after alemtuzumab treatment predict 2-year outcomes in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis
Background: in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS), early disease control reduces the risk of permanent disability. The blood-brain barrier (BBB) is compromised in MS, and its permeability is a potential biomarker.Objective: to investigate BBB permeability measured by MRI as a marker of alemtuzumab efficacy.Methods: patients with RRMS initiating alemtuzumab treatment were recruited prospectively. BBB permeability was assessed as the Patlak-derived influx constant (Ki) by dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI before and 6, 12, and 18 months after the first course of alemtuzumab. No Evidence of Disease Activity-3 (NEDA-3) status was ascertained two years after treatment initiation.Results: patients who maintained NEDA-3 status at two years (n = 7) had a larger decrease in Ki between baseline and six months (-0.029 ml/100 g/min [CI -0.005 to -0.053]) and between baseline and 12 months in normal appearing white matter (0.043 [CI 0.022 to -0.065]), than those who experienced disease activity (n = 8). ROC curve analysis of the Ki change between baseline and 12 months in NAWM predicted a loss of NEDA status at 2 years with 86% sensitivity and 86% specificity (AUC 0.98, p = 0.002).Conclusion: BBB permeability predicted alemtuzumab efficacy at two years, indicating that BBB permeability is a biomarker of treatment response in RRMS
- …
