17 research outputs found
DISKUSSION
No full textLars Højer: Hvilke ting? Hvilke relationer? Hvilke verdener?
Inger Sjørslev: Hvorfor skal forskelligheder være ontologiske?
Anders Blok: Med Wittgenstein på kanten af antropologiens sprogspil?
Heiko Henkel: Hvad kan „mangfoldige verdener“ gøre for os?
Asger F. Simonsen, Toke K. Amlund, Lars Rømer, Astrid Grue og Christina Vega: Rejsen til planeterne M&M
Morten Nielsen: Respons
Morten Axel Pedersen: Respon
"De l´architecture sauvage": Asger Jorns Kritik und Konzept der Modernen Architektur
No full textAsger Jorn is a well known artist, especially his activities within the CoBrA group, Bauhaus Imaginiste and the International Situationist, after WWII contributed greatly to his international success. Besides his paintings, prints, ceramics and sculptures he produced a remarkable amount of theoretical work. In his early years, he repeatedly wrote on architecture and his ideas and concepts are still relevant for the contemporary discourse in architecture. Other than his artistic oeuvre, his theories received much less attention from scholars of architecture and art history, or philosophy. The overall goal of this research is, to expose this rather unknown part of the artist´s work, by highlighting his theoretical positions in architecture between the late 1930s and mid 1950s. Subsequently his opinions and motivations will be situated within the theoretical debate of his time and also be linked to some built architectures, which influenced and formed his conception of architecture and urbanism. Jorn´s position regarding the relationship between architecture and art on the one hand shows very well a harsh critique on modern architecture, but on the other hand it embraces both the options and the difficulty that derive from it. By developing the concept of an “Architecture Sauvage”, Jorn tries to lay out perspectives as to how Modern architecture can contribute to create the adequate environment for the everyday life of human beings, which even for contemporary architects today are remarkebly important.HistoryArchitectur
Contradicting incentives for research collaboration
No full textThis study describes the Danish publication award system (BFI), investigates whether its built-in incentives have had an effect on publication behavior at the University of Southern Denmark, and discusses the possible future implications on researcher incentives should universities wish to measure BFI on the individual level. We analyzed publication data from the university CRIS system (Pure) and from SciVal. Several studies indicate that co-authored scholarly journal articles attract more citations than single author articles. The reason for this are not clear, however, research collaboration across institutions and countries is commonly accepted in the research community and among university managements as one way of increasing the researcher’s and institution’s reputation and impact. The BFI system is designed to award scholarly publication activity at Danish universities, especially publication in international journals of high status. However, we find that the built-in incentives leave the researcher and his or her institution with a dilemma: If the researchers optimize their performance by forming author groups with external collaborators, the optimal way of doing so for the researchers is not the optimal way seen from the perspective of the university. Our analysis shows that the typical article has 6.5 authors, two of which are internal, and that this has remained stable since the introduction of the BFI. However, there is variation across the disciplines. While ‘the Arts and Humanities’ and ‘the Social Sciences’ seem to compose author groups in a way which does not optimize the performance of the institution, both ‘Health’ and ‘the Natural Sciences’ seem to optimize according to criteria other than those specified in the BFI
Opposing incentives for collaboration
No full textThe Danish Bibliometric Research Indicator (BFI) is part of the performance-based model for the distribution of a special pool of baseline funding for universities and public research institutions in Denmark. BFI rewards the research publications published in the most recognized scientific journals, and gives a bonus for publications done through inter-institutionary collaboration. Credits given to universities are fractionalized between the participating universities. So far credits are not assigned to the individual authors but only to their institutions.However, it turns out that research collaboration is associated with a higher number of citations than single authorship which may present the author with two opposing incentives for research collaboration.The Danish Bibliometric Research Indicator (BFI) is part of the performance-based model for the distribution of a special pool of baseline funding for universities and public research institutions in Denmark. BFI rewards the research publications published in the most recognized scientific journals, and gives a bonus for publications done through inter-institutionary collaboration. Credits given to universities are fractionalized between the participating universities. So far credits are not assigned to the individual authors but only to their institutions.However, it turns out that research collaboration is associated with a higher number of citations than single authorship which may present the author with two opposing incentives for research collaboration
Opposing incentives for collaboration
No full textThe Danish Bibliometric Research Indicator (BFI) is part of the performance-based model for the distribution of a special pool of baseline funding for universities and public research institutions in Denmark. BFI rewards the research publications published in the most recognized scientific journals, and gives a bonus for publications done through inter-institutionary collaboration. Credits given to universities are fractionalized between the participating universities. So far credits are not assigned to the individual authors but only to their institutions.However, it turns out that research collaboration is associated with a higher number of citations than single authorship which may present the author with two opposing incentives for research collaboration.The Danish Bibliometric Research Indicator (BFI) is part of the performance-based model for the distribution of a special pool of baseline funding for universities and public research institutions in Denmark. BFI rewards the research publications published in the most recognized scientific journals, and gives a bonus for publications done through inter-institutionary collaboration. Credits given to universities are fractionalized between the participating universities. So far credits are not assigned to the individual authors but only to their institutions.However, it turns out that research collaboration is associated with a higher number of citations than single authorship which may present the author with two opposing incentives for research collaboration
Opposing incentives for collaboration
No full textThe Danish Bibliometric Research Indicator (BFI) is part of the performance-based model for the distribution of a special pool of baseline funding for universities and public research institutions in Denmark. BFI rewards the research publications published in the most recognized scientific journals, and gives a bonus for publications done through inter-institutionary collaboration. Credits given to universities are fractionalized between the participating universities. So far credits are not assigned to the individual authors but only to their institutions. However, it turns out that research collaboration is associated with a higher number of citations than single authorship which may present the author with two opposing incentives for research collaboration
Author Correction: Comprehensive analysis of chromothripsis in 2,658 human cancers using whole-genome sequencing
No full textauthor correctio
Comparison of Levelized Cost of Energy of a 10 MW superconducting and magnetic pseudo direct drive generator targeted for the INNWIND.EU reference turbine
No full textInnovative drive trains targeted at 10-20 MW offshore turbines are investigated in the INNWIND.EU project in order to determine the impact on the Levelized Cost of Energy (LCoE) resulting when installed in the ,North sea at 50 m of water [1]. The two main technologies studied are superconducting direct drive (SCDD)[2] and the magnetic pseudo direct drive (PDD) [3] generators, which are both capable to providing compact drive trains with low weight and a small number of moving parts compared to a gearbox based drive train (see figure 1a). Superconducting field coils are used to provide the torque in the direct drive generators, where the armature windings are based on conventional copper wire and magnetic steel laminates operated at ambient temperature. Magnetic pseudo direct drive generators consist of a magnetic gearbox made of an inner free rotor (rotating at a geared up speed to the blade input) and an intermediate drive rotor inserted into an outer static armature winding, where the electricity is harvested.DC systems, Energy conversion & Storag
Recommended from our members
Author Correction: Analyses of non-coding somatic drivers in 2,658 cancer whole genomes.
No full text
