1,720,991 research outputs found
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
Full text linkThe present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
Variations on the Author
Full text link“Variations on the Author” discusses two of Eduardo Coutinho’s recent films (Um Dia na Vida, from 2010, and Últimas Conversas, posthumously released in 2015) and their contribution to the general question of documentary authorship. The director’s filmography is characterized by a consistent yet self-effacing form of authorial self-inscription: Coutinho often features as an interviewer that rather than express opinions propels discourses; an interviewer that is good at listening. This mode of self-inscription characterizes him as an author who is not expressive but who is nonetheless markedly present on the screen. In Um Dia na Vida, however, Coutinho is completely absent form the image, while Últimas Conversas, on the contrary, includes a confessional prologue that moves the director from the margins to the center of his films. This article examines the ways in which these works stand out in the filmography of a director who offers new insights into the notion of cinematic authorship
Appropriate Similarity Measures for Author Cocitation Analysis
Full text linkWe provide a number of new insights into the methodological discussion about author cocitation analysis. We first argue that the use of the Pearson correlation for measuring the similarity between authors’ cocitation profiles is not very satisfactory. We then discuss what kind of similarity measures may be used as an alternative to the Pearson correlation. We consider three similarity measures in particular. One is the well-known cosine. The other two similarity measures have not been used before in the bibliometric literature. Finally, we show by means of an example that our findings have a high practical relevance.information science;Pearson correlation;cosine;similarity measure;author cocitation analysis
Dispelling the Myths Behind First-author Citation Counts
Full text linkWe conducted a full-scale evaluative citation analysis study of scholars in the XML research field to explore just how different from each other author rankings resulting from different citation counting methods actually are, and to demonstrate the capability of emerging data and tools on the Web in supporting more realistic citation counting methods. Our results contest some common arguments for the continued
use of first-author citation counts in the evaluation of scholars, such as high correlations between author rankings by first-author citation counts and other citation
counting methods, and high costs of using more realistic citation counting methods that are not well-supported by the ISI databases. It is argued that increasingly available digital full text research papers make it possible for citation analysis studies to go beyond what the ISI databases have directly supported and to employ more
sophisticated methods
Vaccines provide disproportional protection to the increased hospitalisation risk posed by the Delta variant of SARS-CoV2: a meta-analysis
Full text linkVariants of SARS-CoV2 that achieved global dominance (Alpha and Delta) have been associated with increased hospitalisation risk. A quantification of this risk across studies is currently lacking for Delta. Furthermore, how risk for severe disease changes in both vaccinated and unvaccinated individuals is important as the underlying risks determine public health impact. The surplus risk of Delta versus Alpha on hospitalisation was determined using random-effects meta-analysis. Infection with the Delta compared to the Alpha variant increased hospitalisation risk (unvaccinated: log HR 0.62, CI: 0.41 – 0.84, P < 0.0001; linear HR 1.87). This finding should inform our response to future variants of concern, currently Omicron. SARS-CoV2 variants that achieve dominance, have achieved this through a higher rate of infection and this evolutionary trajectory has also come with a correlated higher risk of severe disease. The surplus risk posed by Delta was significantly lower however in the vaccinated (model estimate -0.40, CI: -0.73 – -0.07, P = 0.017). Vaccination thus provided a disproportionate level of protection to hospitalisation with the Delta variant and provides further rationale for vaccination for SARS-CoV2 as a durable public health measure
koamabayili/VECTRON-author-checklist: VECTRON author checklist
No full textWe have done our best to complete the author checklist relating to the use of animals in the hut study. Note that the objective for the hut study was to evaluate the IRS treatment applications for residual efficacy against Anopheles mosquitoes, including the local An. coluzzii mosquito population. Cows were only used to attract mosquitoes into the huts and no tests were carried out directly on the cows. The author checklist is intended for use with studies where experiments are carried out on animals, which is why we have had such difficulty in completing this for the hut study, as many of the questions do not relate to how the cows were used
Peto’s paradox’s relevance is off the scale
Full text linkPeto's paradox is the disconnect between individual risk of cells to develop malignancy and the absence of a strong increase in cancer incidence with body mass across species. Recently small increases of cancer incidence with body mass across species have been interpreted as a falsification of Peto's paradox. I argue this is a misinterpretation as it is the predicted incredible scale of the increase in cancer incidence with body mass that led to Peto's paradox. The relevance for the biology of cancer and ageing of Peto's paradox is off the scale and remains a highly valid paradigm of study
Author-wise bibliometric analysis based on entropy.
No full textAuthor-wise bibliometric analysis based on entropy.</p
- …
