1,720,975 research outputs found
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
The present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
Variations on the Author
“Variations on the Author” discusses two of Eduardo Coutinho’s recent films (Um Dia na Vida, from 2010, and Últimas Conversas, posthumously released in 2015) and their contribution to the general question of documentary authorship. The director’s filmography is characterized by a consistent yet self-effacing form of authorial self-inscription: Coutinho often features as an interviewer that rather than express opinions propels discourses; an interviewer that is good at listening. This mode of self-inscription characterizes him as an author who is not expressive but who is nonetheless markedly present on the screen. In Um Dia na Vida, however, Coutinho is completely absent form the image, while Últimas Conversas, on the contrary, includes a confessional prologue that moves the director from the margins to the center of his films. This article examines the ways in which these works stand out in the filmography of a director who offers new insights into the notion of cinematic authorship
The miR-17-92 microRNA cluster: a novel diagnostic tool in large B-cell malignancies.
Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) can present as de novo or can arise through the transformation of many indolent lymphomas, including follicular lymphoma (FL). The morphological differentiation between germinal center-DLBCL (GC-DLBCL) and high-grade (grade 3) FL could be challenging; the accurate sub-classification of large B-cell lymphomas is mandatory in order to select the most appropriate among the new-targeted therapies. Recent expression profiling studies reported microRNAs (miRNAs) (and miR-17-92 cluster, in particular) as useful tools in differentiating DLBCL and FL. However, these preliminary results are based on cell line-derived data or did not consider grade 3 FL cases. To investigate this point, 36 cases of GC-DLBCL and 18 cases of grade 3 non-transforming FL were considered. All diagnoses were based on the World Health Organization criteria and were confirmed by clinical, histological, and immunohistochemical data. Six members of the miR-17-92 cluster (ie, miR-18b, miR-19b, miR-20a, miR-92, miR-93, and miR-106a) and two control miRNAs (ie, miR-150 and miR-210) were quantified by quantitative reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction. All the considered miR-17-92 cluster miRNAs were significantly overexpressed in GC-DLBCL, being miR-20a and miR-106a the most dysregulated (P<0.001). Receiver operating characteristics (ROCs) analysis was used to find the optimal cut-off in distinguishing the two histotypes. The ROC estimated thresholds for miR-18b, miR-19b, miR-20a, miR-92, and miR-106a displayed a sensitivity level higher than 0.80 in achieving the GC-DLBCL diagnosis. The classification tree built on the six thresholds allowed the correct identification of 35/36 GC-DLBCL (97.2%). Profiling the miR-17-92 cluster is a promising investigative method for differentiating GC-DLBCL from high-grade FL. Subject to the validation of these findings in further larger studies; miR-17-92 cluster could represent a reliable, standardizable diagnostic tool for the sub-classification of large B-cell lymphoid neoplasm
Appropriate Similarity Measures for Author Cocitation Analysis
We provide a number of new insights into the methodological discussion about author cocitation analysis. We first argue that the use of the Pearson correlation for measuring the similarity between authors’ cocitation profiles is not very satisfactory. We then discuss what kind of similarity measures may be used as an alternative to the Pearson correlation. We consider three similarity measures in particular. One is the well-known cosine. The other two similarity measures have not been used before in the bibliometric literature. Finally, we show by means of an example that our findings have a high practical relevance.information science;Pearson correlation;cosine;similarity measure;author cocitation analysis
Fine needle aspiration of non-small cell lung cancer: current state and future perspective.
Fine needle aspiration of non-small cell lung cancer: current state and future perspective The emerging treatment revolution determined by the advent of new targeted therapies requires accurate tumour subtyping as a mandatory step in the clinical workup of patients with non-small cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC). As a result of advanced and inoperable disease or poor performance status, in many patients, minimally invasive procedures must be employed to obtain diagnostic material. Fine needle aspiration (FNA) is a valid and widely employed alternative to either tru-cut or open-sky biopsy. Indeed, cytological specimens are suitable for techniques such as immunocytochemistry, mutation and microRNA analysis, and may present advantages over small biopsies especially if cell blocks are prepared and attention is paid to cytomorphology and pre-analytic management of specimens at the time they are collected. These will allow the adequate stratification of patients into different diagnostic and prognostic classes
Dispelling the Myths Behind First-author Citation Counts
We conducted a full-scale evaluative citation analysis study of scholars in the XML research field to explore just how different from each other author rankings resulting from different citation counting methods actually are, and to demonstrate the capability of emerging data and tools on the Web in supporting more realistic citation counting methods. Our results contest some common arguments for the continued
use of first-author citation counts in the evaluation of scholars, such as high correlations between author rankings by first-author citation counts and other citation
counting methods, and high costs of using more realistic citation counting methods that are not well-supported by the ISI databases. It is argued that increasingly available digital full text research papers make it possible for citation analysis studies to go beyond what the ISI databases have directly supported and to employ more
sophisticated methods
koamabayili/VECTRON-author-checklist: VECTRON author checklist
We have done our best to complete the author checklist relating to the use of animals in the hut study. Note that the objective for the hut study was to evaluate the IRS treatment applications for residual efficacy against Anopheles mosquitoes, including the local An. coluzzii mosquito population. Cows were only used to attract mosquitoes into the huts and no tests were carried out directly on the cows. The author checklist is intended for use with studies where experiments are carried out on animals, which is why we have had such difficulty in completing this for the hut study, as many of the questions do not relate to how the cows were used
Author-wise bibliometric analysis based on entropy.
Author-wise bibliometric analysis based on entropy.</p
- …
