1,721,136 research outputs found

    Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis

    Full text link
    The present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed

    Variations on the Author

    Full text link
    “Variations on the Author” discusses two of Eduardo Coutinho’s recent films (Um Dia na Vida, from 2010, and Últimas Conversas, posthumously released in 2015) and their contribution to the general question of documentary authorship. The director’s filmography is characterized by a consistent yet self-effacing form of authorial self-inscription: Coutinho often features as an interviewer that rather than express opinions propels discourses; an interviewer that is good at listening. This mode of self-inscription characterizes him as an author who is not expressive but who is nonetheless markedly present on the screen. In Um Dia na Vida, however, Coutinho is completely absent form the image, while Últimas Conversas, on the contrary, includes a confessional prologue that moves the director from the margins to the center of his films. This article examines the ways in which these works stand out in the filmography of a director who offers new insights into the notion of cinematic authorship

    Appropriate Similarity Measures for Author Cocitation Analysis

    Full text link
    We provide a number of new insights into the methodological discussion about author cocitation analysis. We first argue that the use of the Pearson correlation for measuring the similarity between authors’ cocitation profiles is not very satisfactory. We then discuss what kind of similarity measures may be used as an alternative to the Pearson correlation. We consider three similarity measures in particular. One is the well-known cosine. The other two similarity measures have not been used before in the bibliometric literature. Finally, we show by means of an example that our findings have a high practical relevance.information science;Pearson correlation;cosine;similarity measure;author cocitation analysis

    The right to be forgotten in breast cancer : new propositions

    No full text
    73 p.Ill.,SCIENTIFIC REPORT 6 -- OUTLINE OF THIS REPORT 6 -- 1 INTRODUCTION 6 -- BACKGROUND: SETTING THE SCENE 6 -- 1.1.1 The “right to be forgotten” and outstanding balance insurance in Belgium 6 -- 1.1.2 International comparison 7 -- THE MANDATE OF THE KCE IN THE “RIGHT TO BE FORGOTTEN” LEGISLATION 12 -- RATIONALE FOR THE TOPIC OF BREAST CANCER AS A FIRST REPORT .12 -- 2 IN SITU AND EARLY-STAGE INVASIVE BREAST CANCER 13 -- PATHOGENESIS: A BRIEF OVERVIEW OF MAIN TYPES AND CHARACTERISTICS 13 -- EPIDEMIOLOGY .16 -- 2.2.1 Incidence, mortality and premature mortality burden .16 -- 2.2.2 Prognostic factors of breast cancer survivors 22 -- SCOPE OF THIS REPORT: IN SITU OR EARLY-STAGE OPERABLE INVASIVE BREAST CANCER AND TREATMENT WITH CURATIVE INTENT .23 -- 3 OBJECTIVES 26 -- RESEARCH OBJECTIVES 26 -- TARGET AUDIENCE 26 -- RESEARCH QUESTIONS .27 -- 4 METHODOLOGY 28 -- A NEW RESEARCH MISSION FOR KCE: PREPARATORY METHODOLOGICAL STEPS 28 -- POPULATION-BASED REGISTRY STUDY USING NATIONAL HEALTH-ADMINISTRATIVE DATABASES 29 -- 4.2.1 General methodological approach 29 -- 4.2.2 Additional legislative or regulatory aspects with potential methodological implications 31 -- 4.2.3 Description of databases: Belgian Cancer Registry data selection, linkage with Intermutualistic Agency data and vital status .31 -- 4.2.4 Statistical analyses 35 -- LITERATURE REVIEW 37 -- 5 RESULTS 40 -- POPULATION-BASED REGISTRY STUDY USING NATIONAL HEALTH-ADMINISTRATIVE DATABASES .40 -- 5.1.1 Characteristics of the study sample: main demographics and tumour characteristics at diagnosis 40 -- 5.1.2 Results of predicted excess mortality hazard, net survival and conditional net survival in in situ and early-stage invasive breast cancer 41 -- LITERATURE REVIEW 48 -- 6 SUMMARY: KEY FINDINGS AND POTENTIAL PROPOSITIONS FOR THE REFERENCE TABLES 55 -- 7 DISCUSSION 59 -- METHODOLOGICAL LIMITATIONS .59 -- 7.1.1 Population-based study 59 -- 7.1.2 Literature review 64 -- PATIENT, CONSUMER AND EXPERT PERSPECTIVES 65 -- 8 CONCLUSION .66 -- PROPOSITION FOR AMENDMENT .66 -- PERSPECTIVES ON METHODOLOGICAL APPROACH AND FUTURE STUDY TOPICS 67 -- REFERENCES .6

    Dispelling the Myths Behind First-author Citation Counts

    Full text link
    We conducted a full-scale evaluative citation analysis study of scholars in the XML research field to explore just how different from each other author rankings resulting from different citation counting methods actually are, and to demonstrate the capability of emerging data and tools on the Web in supporting more realistic citation counting methods. Our results contest some common arguments for the continued use of first-author citation counts in the evaluation of scholars, such as high correlations between author rankings by first-author citation counts and other citation counting methods, and high costs of using more realistic citation counting methods that are not well-supported by the ISI databases. It is argued that increasingly available digital full text research papers make it possible for citation analysis studies to go beyond what the ISI databases have directly supported and to employ more sophisticated methods

    Author Index

    No full text
    Nao informado

    koamabayili/VECTRON-author-checklist: VECTRON author checklist

    No full text
    We have done our best to complete the author checklist relating to the use of animals in the hut study. Note that the objective for the hut study was to evaluate the IRS treatment applications for residual efficacy against Anopheles mosquitoes, including the local An. coluzzii mosquito population. Cows were only used to attract mosquitoes into the huts and no tests were carried out directly on the cows. The author checklist is intended for use with studies where experiments are carried out on animals, which is why we have had such difficulty in completing this for the hut study, as many of the questions do not relate to how the cows were used

    Le Droit à l’oubli pour le cancer du sein : nouvelles propositions - Synthèse

    No full text
    22 p.Ill.,Il est parfois difficile pour des personnes qui ont eu un cancer par le passé, ou qui souffrent de certaines maladies chroniques, de contracter une assurance solde restant dû, par exemple pour l’obtention d’un crédit hypothécaire. La loi dite « de droit à l’oubli » permet de faciliter l’accès à ces assurances après un certain délai (généralement de 10 ans pour les cancers), et à certaines conditions. Deux listes mentionnant les maladies concernées ont été établies dans ce cadre. Afin de tenir compte de l’évolution des progrès de la médecine, ces listes, ou « grilles de référence » doivent être régulièrement réévaluées. Le Centre Fédéral d’Expertise des Soins de santé (KCE) a été chargé de cette réévaluation. Son premier exercice porte sur le cancer du sein aux stades précoces. Sur la base d’une analyse minutieuse des courbes de survie de ce type de cancer, les chercheurs du KCE ont émis des propositions de raccourcissement du délai d’attente qui concerneraient potentiellement environ une femme sur deux atteintes d’un cancer du sein.PRÉFACE 1-- SYNTHÈSE 2-- 1. LA MISSION “DROIT À L’OUBLI” DU KCE 4-- 1.1. ASSURANCE SOLDE RESTANT DÛ ET RISQUE DE SANTÉ AGGRAVÉ 4-- 1.2. MISSION DU KCE 4-- 1.3. PROGRAMME DE TRAVAIL DU KCE 5-- 2. OBJECTIFS DE CETTE ÉTUDE 6-- 2.1. POURQUOI LE CHOIX DU CANCER DU SEIN ? 6-- 2.2. QUESTIONS DE RECHERCHE 6-- 2.2.1. Question 1: Cancers du sein in situ 6-- 2.2.2. Question 2 : Cancers du sein infiltrants à un stade précoce 7-- 3. LE(S) CANCER(S) DU SEIN 8-- 3.1. LES DIFFÉRENTS TYPES DE CANCER DU SEIN 8-- 3.1.1. Classification histologique 8-- 3.1.2. Classification clinique (stadification) 8-- 3.1.3. Classification génétique/moléculaire 9-- 3.2. FACTEURS PRONOSTIQUES LIÉS À LA PATIENTE 9-- 3.3. FACTEURS LIÉS AU TRAITEMENT 10-- 4. COMMENT AVONS-NOUS PROCÉDÉ ? 10-- 4.1. SOURCES DE DONNÉES 10-- 4.2. SUBDIVISION DES DONNÉES EN SOUS-GROUPES EN FONCTION DU STADE DU CANCER 11-- 4.3. DÉFINITION DE LA « GUÉRISON » 11-- 4.4. DÉLAI D’ATTENTE : À PARTIR DE LA DATE DE FIN DU TRAITEMENT OU DE LA DATE DE DIAGNOSTIC ? 12-- 4.5. LIMITATIONS DE L’ÉTUDE 12-- 5. RÉSULTATS 13-- 5.1. RÉSULTATS POUR LES CANCERS IN-SITU 13-- 5.2. RÉSULTATS POUR LES CANCERS INFILTRANTS 13-- 5.2.1. Avec hypothèse de guérison endéans les 10 ans 13-- 5.2.2. Sans hypothèse de guérison endéans les 10 ans 16-- 6. DISCUSSION 18-- RECOMMANDATIONS 2
    corecore