1,720,952 research outputs found
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
The present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
Variations on the Author
“Variations on the Author” discusses two of Eduardo Coutinho’s recent films (Um Dia na Vida, from 2010, and Últimas Conversas, posthumously released in 2015) and their contribution to the general question of documentary authorship. The director’s filmography is characterized by a consistent yet self-effacing form of authorial self-inscription: Coutinho often features as an interviewer that rather than express opinions propels discourses; an interviewer that is good at listening. This mode of self-inscription characterizes him as an author who is not expressive but who is nonetheless markedly present on the screen. In Um Dia na Vida, however, Coutinho is completely absent form the image, while Últimas Conversas, on the contrary, includes a confessional prologue that moves the director from the margins to the center of his films. This article examines the ways in which these works stand out in the filmography of a director who offers new insights into the notion of cinematic authorship
Appropriate Similarity Measures for Author Cocitation Analysis
We provide a number of new insights into the methodological discussion about author cocitation analysis. We first argue that the use of the Pearson correlation for measuring the similarity between authors’ cocitation profiles is not very satisfactory. We then discuss what kind of similarity measures may be used as an alternative to the Pearson correlation. We consider three similarity measures in particular. One is the well-known cosine. The other two similarity measures have not been used before in the bibliometric literature. Finally, we show by means of an example that our findings have a high practical relevance.information science;Pearson correlation;cosine;similarity measure;author cocitation analysis
Dispelling the Myths Behind First-author Citation Counts
We conducted a full-scale evaluative citation analysis study of scholars in the XML research field to explore just how different from each other author rankings resulting from different citation counting methods actually are, and to demonstrate the capability of emerging data and tools on the Web in supporting more realistic citation counting methods. Our results contest some common arguments for the continued
use of first-author citation counts in the evaluation of scholars, such as high correlations between author rankings by first-author citation counts and other citation
counting methods, and high costs of using more realistic citation counting methods that are not well-supported by the ISI databases. It is argued that increasingly available digital full text research papers make it possible for citation analysis studies to go beyond what the ISI databases have directly supported and to employ more
sophisticated methods
We, singular plural (fragments of a conversation)
Este ensayo filosófico examina la naturaleza problemática del pronombre «nosotros» como un concepto político y ontológico controvertido. Basándose en la noción de «singular plural» de Jean-Luc Nancy, el texto critica las identidades colectivas fijas (nacionales, étnicas o ideológicas) por ser reductivas y excluyentes. Explora la tensión entre la necesidad de articulación comunitaria para la agencia política y los riesgos de homogeneización, destacando cómo el «nosotros» oscila entre el potencial emancipador y la apropiación coercitiva. Pensadores contemporáneos como Judith Butler, Tristan Garcia y teóricos ecológicos (por ejemplo, Baptiste Morizot) inspiran los debates sobre colectivos fluidos, interseccionalidad y alianzas no humanas. El autor defiende el «Nosotros» como una práctica abierta y procedimental —basada en la acción compartida, no en la identidad— para transitar por las esferas públicas fragmentadas, la interdependencia ecológica y la responsabilidad ética frente a la polarización.Este ensaio filosófico examina a natureza problemática do pronome "Nós" como conceito político e ontológico contestado. Baseando-se na noção de "singular plural" de Jean-Luc Nancy, o texto critica identidades coletivas fixas (nacionais, étnicas ou ideológicas) como redutoras e excludentes. Explora a tensão entre a necessidade de articulação comunitária para agência política e os riscos de homogeneização, destacando como "Nós" oscila entre potencial emancipatório e apropriação coercitiva. Pensadores contemporâneos como Judith Butler, Tristan Garcia e teóricos ecológicos (e.g., Baptiste Morizot) fundamentam discussões sobre coletivos fluidos, interseccionalidade e alianças não humanas. O autor defende o "Nós" como prática aberta e processual—ancorada em ação compartilhada, não em identidade—para navegar esferas públicas fragmentadas, interdependência ecológica e responsabilidade ética frente à polarização.This philosophical essay examines the problematic nature of the pronoun "We" as a contested political and ontological concept. Drawing on Jean-Luc Nancy\u27s notion of "singular plural," the text critiques fixed collective identities (national, ethnic, or ideological) as reductive and exclusionary. It explores the tension between the need for community articulation for political agency and the risks of homogenization, highlighting how "We" oscillates between emancipatory potential and coercive appropriation. Contemporary thinkers such as Judith Butler, Tristan Garcia, and ecological theorists (e.g., Baptiste Morizot) inform discussions of fluid collectives, intersectionality, and nonhuman alliances. The author advocates for "We" as an open and procedural practice—anchored in shared action, not identity—to navigate fragmented public spheres, ecological interdependence, and ethical responsibility in the face of polarization.Cet essai philosophique examine la nature problématique du pronom « Nous » en tant que concept politique et ontologique contesté. S\u27appuyant sur la notion de « singulier pluriel » de Jean-Luc Nancy, le texte critique les identités collectives figées (nationales, ethniques ou idéologiques) comme réductrices et exclusives. Il explore la tension entre le besoin d\u27articulation communautaire pour l\u27action politique et les risques d\u27homogénéisation, soulignant comment « Nous » oscille entre potentiel émancipateur et appropriation coercitive. Des penseurs contemporains tels que Judith Butler, Tristan Garcia et des théoriciens de l\u27écologie (par exemple, Baptiste Morizot) nourrissent les discussions sur les collectifs fluides, l\u27intersectionnalité et les alliances non humaines. L\u27auteur défend le « Nous » comme une pratique ouverte et procédurale, ancrée dans l\u27action partagée et non dans l\u27identité, pour naviguer dans des sphères publiques fragmentées, l\u27interdépendance écologique et la responsabilité éthique face à la polarisation
Nosotros, singular plural (fragmentos de una conversación)
Este ensaio filosófico examina a natureza problemática do pronome "Nós" como conceito político e ontológico contestado. Baseando-se na noção de "singular plural" de Jean-Luc Nancy, o texto critica identidades coletivas fixas (nacionais, étnicas ou ideológicas) como redutoras e excludentes. Explora a tensão entre a necessidade de articulação comunitária para agência política e os riscos de homogeneização, destacando como "Nós" oscila entre potencial emancipatório e apropriação coercitiva. Pensadores contemporâneos como Judith Butler, Tristan Garcia e teóricos ecológicos (e.g., Baptiste Morizot) fundamentam discussões sobre coletivos fluidos, interseccionalidade e alianças não humanas. O autor defende o "Nós" como prática aberta e processual—ancorada em ação compartilhada, não em identidade—para navegar esferas públicas fragmentadas, interdependência ecológica e responsabilidade ética frente à polarização.Este ensayo filosófico examina la naturaleza problemática del pronombre «nosotros» como un concepto político y ontológico controvertido. Basándose en la noción de «singular plural» de Jean-Luc Nancy, el texto critica las identidades colectivas fijas (nacionales, étnicas o ideológicas) por ser reductivas y excluyentes. Explora la tensión entre la necesidad de articulación comunitaria para la agencia política y los riesgos de homogeneización, destacando cómo el «nosotros» oscila entre el potencial emancipador y la apropiación coercitiva. Pensadores contemporáneos como Judith Butler, Tristan Garcia y teóricos ecológicos (por ejemplo, Baptiste Morizot) inspiran los debates sobre colectivos fluidos, interseccionalidad y alianzas no humanas. El autor defiende el «Nosotros» como una práctica abierta y procedimental —basada en la acción compartida, no en la identidad— para transitar por las esferas públicas fragmentadas, la interdependencia ecológica y la responsabilidad ética frente a la polarización.This philosophical essay examines the problematic nature of the pronoun "We" as a contested political and ontological concept. Drawing on Jean-Luc Nancy\u27s notion of "singular plural," the text critiques fixed collective identities (national, ethnic, or ideological) as reductive and exclusionary. It explores the tension between the need for community articulation for political agency and the risks of homogenization, highlighting how "We" oscillates between emancipatory potential and coercive appropriation. Contemporary thinkers such as Judith Butler, Tristan Garcia, and ecological theorists (e.g., Baptiste Morizot) inform discussions of fluid collectives, intersectionality, and nonhuman alliances. The author advocates for "We" as an open and procedural practice—anchored in shared action, not identity—to navigate fragmented public spheres, ecological interdependence, and ethical responsibility in the face of polarization.Cet essai philosophique examine la nature problématique du pronom « Nous » en tant que concept politique et ontologique contesté. S\u27appuyant sur la notion de « singulier pluriel » de Jean-Luc Nancy, le texte critique les identités collectives figées (nationales, ethniques ou idéologiques) comme réductrices et exclusives. Il explore la tension entre le besoin d\u27articulation communautaire pour l\u27action politique et les risques d\u27homogénéisation, soulignant comment « Nous » oscille entre potentiel émancipateur et appropriation coercitive. Des penseurs contemporains tels que Judith Butler, Tristan Garcia et des théoriciens de l\u27écologie (par exemple, Baptiste Morizot) nourrissent les discussions sur les collectifs fluides, l\u27intersectionnalité et les alliances non humaines. L\u27auteur défend le « Nous » comme une pratique ouverte et procédurale, ancrée dans l\u27action partagée et non dans l\u27identité, pour naviguer dans des sphères publiques fragmentées, l\u27interdépendance écologique et la responsabilité éthique face à la polarisation
koamabayili/VECTRON-author-checklist: VECTRON author checklist
We have done our best to complete the author checklist relating to the use of animals in the hut study. Note that the objective for the hut study was to evaluate the IRS treatment applications for residual efficacy against Anopheles mosquitoes, including the local An. coluzzii mosquito population. Cows were only used to attract mosquitoes into the huts and no tests were carried out directly on the cows. The author checklist is intended for use with studies where experiments are carried out on animals, which is why we have had such difficulty in completing this for the hut study, as many of the questions do not relate to how the cows were used
Author-wise bibliometric analysis based on entropy.
Author-wise bibliometric analysis based on entropy.</p
- …
