1,721,012 research outputs found
Control of goal-directed and stimulus-driven attention in the brain
No full textWe review evidence for partially segregated networks of brain areas that carry out different attentional functions. One system, which includes parts of the intraparietal cortex and superior frontal cortex, is involved in preparing and applying goal-directed (top-down) selection for stimuli and responses. This system is also modulated by the detection of stimuli. The other system, which includes the temporoparietal cortex and inferior frontal cortex, and is largely lateralized to the right hemisphere, is not involved in top-down selection. Instead, this system is specialized for the detection of behaviourally relevant stimuli, particularly when they are salient or unexpected. This ventral frontoparietal network works as a 'circuit breaker' for the dorsal system, directing attention to salient events. Both attentional systems interact during normal vision, and both are disrupted in unilateral spatial neglect
Visuospatial reorienting signals in the human temporo-parietal junction are independent of response selection
Full text linkThis study contrasts visuospatial reorienting and response selection signals in the right temporo-parietal junction (TPJ) with functional magnetic resonance imaging. The overall goal was to investigate whether spatial orienting signals and motor signals interacted or were independent in TPJ. The right TPJ showed a greater response to targets at invalidly rather than validly cued locations, but no significant modulation from the effector used to respond. We suggest that TPJ may work as a modality-independent 'circuit breaker' for the dorsal fronto-parietal attention system, directing attention to salient events and enabling a variety of responses to those events
An event-related functional magnetic resonance imaging study of voluntary and stimulus-driven orienting of attention
Full text linkAttention can be voluntarily directed to a location or automatically summoned to a location by a salient stimulus. We compared the effects of voluntary and stimulus-driven shifts of spatial attention on the blood oxygenation level-dependent signal in humans, using a method that separated preparatory activity related to the initial shift of attention from the subsequent activity caused by target presentation. Voluntary shifts produced greater preparatory activity than stimulus-driven shifts in the frontal eye field (FEF) and intraparietal sulcus, core regions of the dorsal frontoparietal attention network, demonstrating their special role in the voluntary control of attention. Stimulus-driven attentional shifts to salient color singletons recruited occipitotemporal regions, sensitive to color information and part of the dorsal network, including the FEF, suggesting a partly overlapping circuit for endogenous and exogenous orienting. The right temporoparietal junction (TPJ), a core region of the ventral frontoparietal attention network, was strongly modulated by stimulus-driven attentional shifts to behaviorally relevant stimuli, such as targets at unattended locations. However, the TPJ did not respond to salient, task-irrelevant color singletons, indicating that behavioral relevance is critical for TPJ modulation during stimulus-driven orienting. Finally, both ventral and dorsal regions were modulated during reorienting but significantly only by reorienting after voluntary shifts, suggesting the importance of a mismatch between expectation and sensory input
Erratum: Voluntary orienting is dissociated from target detection in human posterior parietal cortex (vol 3, pg 292, 2000)
No full textBrain signals for spatial attention predict performance in a motion discrimination task
Full text linkThe reliability of visual perception is thought to reflect the quality of the sensory information. However, we show that subjects' performance can be predicted, trial-by-trial, by neural activity that precedes the onset of a sensory stimulus. Using functional MRI (fMRI), we studied how neural mechanisms that mediate spatial attention affect the accuracy of a motion discrimination judgment. The amplitude of blood oxygen level-dependent (BOLD) signals after a cue directing spatial attention predicted subjects' accuracy on 60-75% of the trials. Widespread predictive signals, which included dorsal parietal, visual extra-striate, prefrontal and sensory-motor cortex, depended on whether the cue correctly specified the stimulus location. Therefore, these signals indicate the degree of utilization of the cued information and play a role in the control of spatial attention. We conclude that variability in perceptual performance can be partly explained by the variability in endogenous, preparatory processes and that BOLD signals can be used to forecast human behavior
Voluntary orienting is dissociated from target detection in human posterior parietal cortex
No full textHuman ability to attend to visual stimuli based on their spatial locations requires the parietal cortex. One hypothesis maintains that parietal cortex controls the voluntary orienting of attention toward a location of interest. Another hypothesis emphasizes its role in reorienting attention toward visual targets appearing at unattended locations. Here, using event-related functional magnetic resonance (ER-fMRI), we show that distinct parietal regions mediated these different attentional processes. Cortical activation occurred primarily in the intraparietal sulcus when a location was attended before visual-target presentation, but in the right temporoparietal junction when the target was detected, particularly at an unattended location
A functional MRI study of preparatory signals for spatial location and objects
Full text linkWe investigated preparatory signals for spatial location and objects in normal observers using functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI). Activity for attention-directing cues was separated from activity for subsequent test arrays containing the target stimulus. Subjects were more accurate in discriminating a target face among distracters when they knew in advance its location (spatial directional cue), as compared to when the target could randomly appear at one of two locations (spatial neutral cue), indicating that the spatial cue was used. Spatially specific activations occurred in a region at the intersection of the ventral intraparietal sulcus and transverse occipital sulcus (vIPS-TOS), which showed significantly stronger activation for rightward- than leftward-directing cues. while other fronto-parietal areas were activated by the cue but did not show spatial specificity. In visual cortex, activity was weak or absent in retinotopic occipital regions following attention-directing cues and this activity was not spatially specific. In a separate task, subject discriminated a target outdoor scene among distracters after the presentation of spatial neutral cues. There was no significant difference in dorsal frontoparietal activity during the face versus scene discrimination task. Also, there was only weak evidence for selective preparatory activity in ventral object-selective regions, although the activation of these regions to the subsequent test array did depend upon which discrimination (face or place) was performed. We conclude first that under certain circumstances, spatial cues that produce strong behavioral effects may modulate parietal-occipital regions in a spatially specific manner without producing similar modulations in retinotopic occipital regions. Second, attentional modulations of object-selective regions in temporal-occipital cortex can occur even though preparatory object-selective modulations of those regions are absent or weak. (c) 2005 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
Full text linkThe present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
- …
