186,653 research outputs found
Domino 'Staudinger-aza-Wittig-1,5-phosphonium-rearrangement-fragmentation' reactions of 1-azido-2-hydroxy-4,6-dioxohexanes
No full textThe domino 'Staudinger-aza-Wittig-1,5-phosphonium-rearrangement-fragmentation' reaction of 1-azido-2-hydroxy-4,6-dioxohexanes allows a convenient synthesis of functionalized 1-acetamido-2-alkylidenecyclopentanes
sj-docx-1-asw-10.1177_11786221221101901 – Supplemental material for Impacts on Global Temperature During the First Part of 2020 Due to the Reduction in Human Activities by COVID-19
No full textSupplemental material, sj-docx-1-asw-10.1177_11786221221101901 for Impacts on Global Temperature During the First Part of 2020 Due to the Reduction in Human Activities by COVID-19 by Saeed Shojaei, Pedram Ashofteh, Ngakan Ketut Acwin Dwijendra, Assefa M. Melesse, Ali Reza Shahvaran, Siroos Shojaei and Iman Homayoonnezhad in Air, Soil and Water Research</p
A Stress Tensor-based Failure Criterion for Ordinary State-based Peridynamic Models
No full textPeridynamics is a recent nonlocal theory of continuum mechanics that is suitable to describe fracture problems in solid mechanics. In this paper, a new failure criterion based on the stress field is developed by adopting the damage correspondence model in the ordinary state-based peridynamic theory. The proposed stress tensor-based failure criterion is capable of predicting more accurately crack propagation in the mixed mode I-II fracture problems different from other failure criteria in peridynamics. The effectiveness of the proposed model is demonstrated by performing several examples of mixed-mode dynamic fracture in brittle materials
Author-wise bibliometric analysis based on entropy.
No full textAuthor-wise bibliometric analysis based on entropy.</p
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
No full textThe present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
Appropriate Similarity Measures for Author Cocitation Analysis
No full textWe provide a number of new insights into the methodological discussion about author cocitation analysis. We first argue that the use of the Pearson correlation for measuring the similarity between authors’ cocitation profiles is not very satisfactory. We then discuss what kind of similarity measures may be used as an alternative to the Pearson correlation. We consider three similarity measures in particular. One is the well-known cosine. The other two similarity measures have not been used before in the bibliometric literature. Finally, we show by means of an example that our findings have a high practical relevance.information science;Pearson correlation;cosine;similarity measure;author cocitation analysis
sj-pdf-1-imr-10.1177_03000605221106723 - Supplemental material for Quality of perinatal care for women with high-risk pregnancies during the COVID-19 pandemic in Iran
No full textSupplemental material, sj-pdf-1-imr-10.1177_03000605221106723 for Quality of perinatal care for women with high-risk pregnancies during the COVID-19 pandemic in Iran by Solmaz Mohammadi, Kobra Shojaei, Elham Maraghi and Zahra Motaghi in Journal of International Medical Research</p
Dispelling the Myths Behind First-author Citation Counts
No full textWe conducted a full-scale evaluative citation analysis study of scholars in the XML research field to explore just how different from each other author rankings resulting from different citation counting methods actually are, and to demonstrate the capability of emerging data and tools on the Web in supporting more realistic citation counting methods. Our results contest some common arguments for the continued
use of first-author citation counts in the evaluation of scholars, such as high correlations between author rankings by first-author citation counts and other citation
counting methods, and high costs of using more realistic citation counting methods that are not well-supported by the ISI databases. It is argued that increasingly available digital full text research papers make it possible for citation analysis studies to go beyond what the ISI databases have directly supported and to employ more
sophisticated methods
Dr. Edward P. Wimberly, ITC, July 2011
No full textThis video is a conversation with Dr. Edward P. Wimberly. Dr. Wimberly talks about his book, "No Shame in Wesley's Gospel: A Twenty-First Century Pastoral Gospel". Brad Ost, AUC Woodruff Library, is the interviewer
- …
