1,720,958 research outputs found

    Microleon Butler 1885

    No full text
    Checklist of <i>Microleon</i> in the world (alphabetical order) <p> <i>decolatus</i> Sasaki, 2016 Japan, Korea <i>dianensis</i> Liang, Wang <i>et</i> Solovyev, 2022 China <i>longipalpis</i> Butler, 1885 China, Japan, Korea, Taiwan <i>simingensis</i> Solovyev, Liang <i>et</i> Wang, 2022 China <i>taiwanensis</i> <b>n. sp.</b> Taiwan <i>yoshimotoi</i> Sasaki, 2016 Japan</p>Published as part of <i>Sohn, Jae-Cheon, Shih, Li-Cheng & Wu, Shipher, 2024, Review of Microleon Butler, 1885 (Lepidoptera: Limacodidae) from Taiwan with description of a new species based on morphology and DNA barcoding, pp. 377-384 in Zootaxa 5403 (3)</i> on page 382, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.5403.3.7, <a href="http://zenodo.org/record/10562088">http://zenodo.org/record/10562088</a&gt

    Microleon longipalpis Butler 1885

    No full text
    <i>Microleon longipalpis</i> Butler, 1885 (Figs 1–3, 7–8) <p> <i>Microleon longipalpis</i> Butler, 1885: 121. Type locality: Japan, Yokohama.</p> <p> <i>Material examined</i>. 1♂, Ilan Co., Yuanshan, Fushan Botanical Garden, 23 Apr. 2011 (S Wu & WC Chang), [GSN] TFRI146905, TFRI.</p> <p> <i>Distribution</i>. China, Japan, Korea, Russia (Far East), Taiwan.</p> <p> <i>Remarks</i>. The occurrence of this species in Taiwan was repeatedly mentioned in various checklists. Lin <i>et al.</i> (2019) submitted a COI barcode of <i>M. longipalpis</i> to the GenBank (accession number: MK 128277) without details of the collecting locality. The first author of the study (Dr. Yuchi Lin <i>pers. comm.</i>) informed that the specimen had been collected from Xinbaiyang, Xiulin Township in Hualien County, Taiwan on 14 September, 2015. It turned out to be the true <i>M. longipalpis</i> in our NJ tree for the COI barcodes of <i>Microleon</i> (Fig. 10). The male genitalia of <i>M. longipalpis</i> from Taiwan (Fig. 8) exhibit no significant differences from those of the conspecific specimens from Japan (Sasaki 2016), Korea (Fig. 7) and Russia (Solovyev 2008). The holotype of <i>M. longipalpis</i> in the collection of NHMUK (Figs 1 & 2) and a conspecific specimen from Taiwan (Fig. 3) are illustrated here.</p>Published as part of <i>Sohn, Jae-Cheon, Shih, Li-Cheng & Wu, Shipher, 2024, Review of Microleon Butler, 1885 (Lepidoptera: Limacodidae) from Taiwan with description of a new species based on morphology and DNA barcoding, pp. 377-384 in Zootaxa 5403 (3)</i> on page 380, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.5403.3.7, <a href="http://zenodo.org/record/10562088">http://zenodo.org/record/10562088</a&gt

    Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis

    Full text link
    The present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed

    Microleon Butler 1885

    No full text
    Genus <i>Microleon</i> Butler, 1885 <p> <i>Microleon</i> Butler, 1885: 121.</p> <p> Type species: <i>Microleon longipalpis</i> Butler, 1885.</p> <p> <i>Diagnosis</i>. Liang <i>et al.</i> (2022) associated this genus with <i>Euphlyctina</i> Hering, 1931 but distinguished both genera in forewing shape and patterns and the male genitalia. Adults of <i>Microleon</i> are nearly indistinguishable in external appearance so they are better identified with the examination of the genitalia (Sasaki 2016). Liang <i>et al.</i> (2022) provided a key to all the congeners. The key is updated with the new species found in this study.</p> A key to the world species of <i>Microleon</i>, based on male genitalia <p>1. Gnathos present...................................................................................... 2</p> <p> - Gnathos absent................................................................. <i>dianensis</i> Liang <i>et al.</i>, 2022</p> <p>2. Juxta with prominent processes dorsolaterally.............................................................. 3</p> <p>- Juxta without prominent processes dorsolaterally............................................................ 4</p> <p> 3. Gnathal medial plate extended laterally................................................ <i>longipalpis</i> Butler, 1885</p> <p> - Gnathal medial plate spatulate........................................................ <i>yoshimotoi</i> Sasaki, 2016</p> <p>4. Left sacculus with dorsal process longer than ventral one..................................................... 5</p> <p> - Left sacculus with ventral process longer than dorsal one................................... <i>decolatus</i> Sasaki, 2016</p> <p> 5. Right sacculus with dorsal process 2× longer than ventral one.................................... <i>taiwanensis</i> <b>n. sp.</b></p> <p> - Right sacculus with dorsal process>3.5× longer than ventral one..................... <i>simingensis</i> Solovyev <i>et al.</i>, 2022</p>Published as part of <i>Sohn, Jae-Cheon, Shih, Li-Cheng & Wu, Shipher, 2024, Review of Microleon Butler, 1885 (Lepidoptera: Limacodidae) from Taiwan with description of a new species based on morphology and DNA barcoding, pp. 377-384 in Zootaxa 5403 (3)</i> on page 379, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.5403.3.7, <a href="http://zenodo.org/record/10562088">http://zenodo.org/record/10562088</a&gt

    Variations on the Author

    Full text link
    “Variations on the Author” discusses two of Eduardo Coutinho’s recent films (Um Dia na Vida, from 2010, and Últimas Conversas, posthumously released in 2015) and their contribution to the general question of documentary authorship. The director’s filmography is characterized by a consistent yet self-effacing form of authorial self-inscription: Coutinho often features as an interviewer that rather than express opinions propels discourses; an interviewer that is good at listening. This mode of self-inscription characterizes him as an author who is not expressive but who is nonetheless markedly present on the screen. In Um Dia na Vida, however, Coutinho is completely absent form the image, while Últimas Conversas, on the contrary, includes a confessional prologue that moves the director from the margins to the center of his films. This article examines the ways in which these works stand out in the filmography of a director who offers new insights into the notion of cinematic authorship

    Appropriate Similarity Measures for Author Cocitation Analysis

    Full text link
    We provide a number of new insights into the methodological discussion about author cocitation analysis. We first argue that the use of the Pearson correlation for measuring the similarity between authors’ cocitation profiles is not very satisfactory. We then discuss what kind of similarity measures may be used as an alternative to the Pearson correlation. We consider three similarity measures in particular. One is the well-known cosine. The other two similarity measures have not been used before in the bibliometric literature. Finally, we show by means of an example that our findings have a high practical relevance.information science;Pearson correlation;cosine;similarity measure;author cocitation analysis

    Dispelling the Myths Behind First-author Citation Counts

    Full text link
    We conducted a full-scale evaluative citation analysis study of scholars in the XML research field to explore just how different from each other author rankings resulting from different citation counting methods actually are, and to demonstrate the capability of emerging data and tools on the Web in supporting more realistic citation counting methods. Our results contest some common arguments for the continued use of first-author citation counts in the evaluation of scholars, such as high correlations between author rankings by first-author citation counts and other citation counting methods, and high costs of using more realistic citation counting methods that are not well-supported by the ISI databases. It is argued that increasingly available digital full text research papers make it possible for citation analysis studies to go beyond what the ISI databases have directly supported and to employ more sophisticated methods

    Author Index

    No full text
    Nao informado

    koamabayili/VECTRON-author-checklist: VECTRON author checklist

    No full text
    We have done our best to complete the author checklist relating to the use of animals in the hut study. Note that the objective for the hut study was to evaluate the IRS treatment applications for residual efficacy against Anopheles mosquitoes, including the local An. coluzzii mosquito population. Cows were only used to attract mosquitoes into the huts and no tests were carried out directly on the cows. The author checklist is intended for use with studies where experiments are carried out on animals, which is why we have had such difficulty in completing this for the hut study, as many of the questions do not relate to how the cows were used
    corecore