1,721,106 research outputs found
Semi-automated unidirectional sequence analysis for mutation detection in a clinical diagnostic setting
No full textBACKGROUND: The past 10 years have seen an improvement in sequence data quality due to the introduction of capillary sequencers and new sequencing chemistries. In parallel, new software programs for automated mutation detection have been developed. We evaluated the sensitivity of semiautomated unidirectional sequence analysis for the detection of heterozygous base substitutions using the Mutation Surveyor software package.METHODS: Detection rates for heterozygous base substitutions in 29 genes by automated and visual inspection were compared. Examples of heterozygous bases not detected in one direction during bidirectional analysis were also sought through a national survey of United Kingdom (UK) genetics laboratories. Sequence quality was assessed in a consecutive cohort of 50 patients for whom the 39 exons of the ABCC8 gene had been sequenced in one direction.RESULTS: A total of 701 different heterozygous base substitutions were detected by the software with no false negatives (sensitivity >or=99.57%). Four examples of heterozygous bases missed in one direction during bidirectional analysis were reported. Two were detected using unidirectional analysis settings, and the other two bases had low-quality scores. Of the 1950 amplicons examined, 97.2% had a quality score >or=30 and an average PHRED-like score >or=50 for the defined region of interest, and 98.1% of the 323,650 bases had a PHRED score >40.CONCLUSIONS: We found no evidence to support a requirement for bidirectional sequencing. Semiautomated analysis of good quality unidirectional sequence data has high sensitivity and is suitable for heterozygote mutation scanning in clinical diagnostic laboratories. Further work is required to determine minimum quality parameters for semiautomated analysis.<br/
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
Full text linkThe present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
Variations on the Author
Full text link“Variations on the Author” discusses two of Eduardo Coutinho’s recent films (Um Dia na Vida, from 2010, and Últimas Conversas, posthumously released in 2015) and their contribution to the general question of documentary authorship. The director’s filmography is characterized by a consistent yet self-effacing form of authorial self-inscription: Coutinho often features as an interviewer that rather than express opinions propels discourses; an interviewer that is good at listening. This mode of self-inscription characterizes him as an author who is not expressive but who is nonetheless markedly present on the screen. In Um Dia na Vida, however, Coutinho is completely absent form the image, while Últimas Conversas, on the contrary, includes a confessional prologue that moves the director from the margins to the center of his films. This article examines the ways in which these works stand out in the filmography of a director who offers new insights into the notion of cinematic authorship
Appropriate Similarity Measures for Author Cocitation Analysis
Full text linkWe provide a number of new insights into the methodological discussion about author cocitation analysis. We first argue that the use of the Pearson correlation for measuring the similarity between authors’ cocitation profiles is not very satisfactory. We then discuss what kind of similarity measures may be used as an alternative to the Pearson correlation. We consider three similarity measures in particular. One is the well-known cosine. The other two similarity measures have not been used before in the bibliometric literature. Finally, we show by means of an example that our findings have a high practical relevance.information science;Pearson correlation;cosine;similarity measure;author cocitation analysis
Dispelling the Myths Behind First-author Citation Counts
Full text linkWe conducted a full-scale evaluative citation analysis study of scholars in the XML research field to explore just how different from each other author rankings resulting from different citation counting methods actually are, and to demonstrate the capability of emerging data and tools on the Web in supporting more realistic citation counting methods. Our results contest some common arguments for the continued
use of first-author citation counts in the evaluation of scholars, such as high correlations between author rankings by first-author citation counts and other citation
counting methods, and high costs of using more realistic citation counting methods that are not well-supported by the ISI databases. It is argued that increasingly available digital full text research papers make it possible for citation analysis studies to go beyond what the ISI databases have directly supported and to employ more
sophisticated methods
koamabayili/VECTRON-author-checklist: VECTRON author checklist
No full textWe have done our best to complete the author checklist relating to the use of animals in the hut study. Note that the objective for the hut study was to evaluate the IRS treatment applications for residual efficacy against Anopheles mosquitoes, including the local An. coluzzii mosquito population. Cows were only used to attract mosquitoes into the huts and no tests were carried out directly on the cows. The author checklist is intended for use with studies where experiments are carried out on animals, which is why we have had such difficulty in completing this for the hut study, as many of the questions do not relate to how the cows were used
Author-wise bibliometric analysis based on entropy.
No full textAuthor-wise bibliometric analysis based on entropy.</p
- …
