1,720,964 research outputs found

    Supported molybdenum oxides as effective catalysts for the catalytic fast pyrolysis of lignocellulosic biomass

    Get PDF
    The catalytic fast pyrolysis (CFP) of pine was investigated over 10 wt% MoO[subscript 3]/TiO[subscript 2] and MoO[subscript 3]/ZrO[subscript 2] at 500 °C and H[subscript 2] pressures ≤0.75 bar. The product distributions were monitored in real time using a molecular beam mass spectrometer (MBMS). Both supported MoO[subscript 3] catalysts show different levels of deoxygenation based on the cumulative biomass to MoO[subscript 3] mass ratio exposed to the catalytic bed. For biomass to MoO[subscript 3] mass ratios <1.5, predominantly olefinic and aromatic hydrocarbons are produced with no detectable oxygen-containing species. For ratios ≥1.5, partially deoxygenated species comprised of furans and phenols are observed, with a concomitant decrease of olefinic and aromatic hydrocarbons. For ratios ≥5, primary pyrolysis vapours break through the bed, indicating the onset of catalyst deactivation. Product quantification with a tandem micropyrolyzer–GCMS setup shows that fresh supported MoO[subscript 3] catalysts convert ca. 27 mol% of the original carbon into hydrocarbons comprised predominantly of aromatics (7 C%), olefins (18 C%) and paraffins (2 C%), comparable to the total hydrocarbon yield obtained with HZSM-5 operated under similar reaction conditions. Post-reaction XPS analysis on supported MoO[subscript 3]/ZrO[subscript 2] and MoO[subscript 3]/TiO[subscript 2] catalysts reveal that ca. 50% of Mo surface species exist in their partially reduced forms (i.e., Mo5[superscript +] and Mo3[superscript +]), and that catalyst deactivation is likely associated to coking.BP (Firm) (MIT Energy Initiative. Advanced Conversion Research Program)National Science Foundation (U.S.) (Award 1454299

    Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis

    Get PDF
    The present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed

    Variations on the Author

    Get PDF
    “Variations on the Author” discusses two of Eduardo Coutinho’s recent films (Um Dia na Vida, from 2010, and Últimas Conversas, posthumously released in 2015) and their contribution to the general question of documentary authorship. The director’s filmography is characterized by a consistent yet self-effacing form of authorial self-inscription: Coutinho often features as an interviewer that rather than express opinions propels discourses; an interviewer that is good at listening. This mode of self-inscription characterizes him as an author who is not expressive but who is nonetheless markedly present on the screen. In Um Dia na Vida, however, Coutinho is completely absent form the image, while Últimas Conversas, on the contrary, includes a confessional prologue that moves the director from the margins to the center of his films. This article examines the ways in which these works stand out in the filmography of a director who offers new insights into the notion of cinematic authorship

    Appropriate Similarity Measures for Author Cocitation Analysis

    Get PDF
    We provide a number of new insights into the methodological discussion about author cocitation analysis. We first argue that the use of the Pearson correlation for measuring the similarity between authors’ cocitation profiles is not very satisfactory. We then discuss what kind of similarity measures may be used as an alternative to the Pearson correlation. We consider three similarity measures in particular. One is the well-known cosine. The other two similarity measures have not been used before in the bibliometric literature. Finally, we show by means of an example that our findings have a high practical relevance.information science;Pearson correlation;cosine;similarity measure;author cocitation analysis

    Dispelling the Myths Behind First-author Citation Counts

    Get PDF
    We conducted a full-scale evaluative citation analysis study of scholars in the XML research field to explore just how different from each other author rankings resulting from different citation counting methods actually are, and to demonstrate the capability of emerging data and tools on the Web in supporting more realistic citation counting methods. Our results contest some common arguments for the continued use of first-author citation counts in the evaluation of scholars, such as high correlations between author rankings by first-author citation counts and other citation counting methods, and high costs of using more realistic citation counting methods that are not well-supported by the ISI databases. It is argued that increasingly available digital full text research papers make it possible for citation analysis studies to go beyond what the ISI databases have directly supported and to employ more sophisticated methods

    Author Index

    No full text
    Nao informado

    Hydrogenolysis of Polyethylene over Earth-Abundant Cobalt Catalysts

    Get PDF
    In recent times, plastics have become indispensable to human life. The availability of raw materials, ease of production, and versatility have made plastics ubiquitous. The pollution, however, caused by improper disposal has become a major global concern. Most plastics used today are single-use and end up in landfills and water bodies. Only about 9% of them are recycled. To remedy plastic pollution's environmental consequences and move toward creating a circular plastic economy, effectively upcycling and recycling plastic waste has gathered significant attention. One avenue toward chemically repurposing polyolefins is via hydrogenolysis. Hydrogenolysis is a depolymerization reaction wherein hydrogen molecules break the relatively inert C-C backbone of the polyolefin. Ru is regarded as the most active hydrogenolysis catalyst. This work studied the hydrogenolysis of polyethylene using earth-abundant cobalt immobilized on a neutral support, silica (Co/SiO2). Co showed ~30% n-octadecane (n-C18) conversion into the full range of C1-C17 alkanes, compared to Ru (100% conversion to methane), Pt, Pd, and Fe (~3%, 0%, and 0% conversion, respectively). It was shown that Co/SiO2 is an excellent catalyst that selectively converts polyethylene into liquid range hydrocarbons (C5-C30) at mild conditions (250-275 ��C, 20-30 bar H2, and 4-8 h). At optimized conditions (275 ��C, 30 bar H2, 8 h), ~19.5% gaseous and ~58.2% liquid products were yielded with an average liquid carbon of 22 (diesel-motor oil range). The catalyst further successfully converted end-of-use polyethylenes despite additives and impurities. The catalyst's active phase was CoO, and it showed exceptional regeneration between runs, giving nearly identical product distributions. Mechanistically, it was identified that Co favors the non-terminal C-C bond cleavage route, selectivity producing oligomers over gases at low conversions, which subsequently hydrogenolyze into lower hydrocarbons, eventually forming methane in secondary and tertiary events

    koamabayili/VECTRON-author-checklist: VECTRON author checklist

    No full text
    We have done our best to complete the author checklist relating to the use of animals in the hut study. Note that the objective for the hut study was to evaluate the IRS treatment applications for residual efficacy against Anopheles mosquitoes, including the local An. coluzzii mosquito population. Cows were only used to attract mosquitoes into the huts and no tests were carried out directly on the cows. The author checklist is intended for use with studies where experiments are carried out on animals, which is why we have had such difficulty in completing this for the hut study, as many of the questions do not relate to how the cows were used
    corecore