196,345 research outputs found

    Comment on \u27Impacts, Costs, and Techniques for Mitigation of Contaminated Groundwater: A Review\u27 by M. Sharefkin, M. Shechter, and A.V. Kneese

    No full text
    Published response to \u27Impacts, Costs, and Techniques for Mitigation of Contaminated Groundwater: A Review\u27 by M. Sharefkin, M. Shechter, and A.V. Kneese, Water Resources Research, Volume 20, Issue 12

    Phytoseius coheni Swirski & Shechter 1961

    No full text
    Phytoseius coheni Swirski & Shechter Phytoseius (Dubininellus) macropilis coheni Swirski & Shechter 1961: 104. Phytoseius (Phytoseius) macropilis coheni, Ehara 1966: 26. Phytoseius (Dubininellus) coheni, Swirski & Golan 1967: 226; Wu 1997: 153. Phytoseius (Phytoseius) coheni, Moraes et al. 1986: 219. Phytoseius coheni, Moraes et al. 2004: 235; Chant & McMurtry 2007: 129. Phytoseius hawaiiensis Prasad 1968: 1460 (synonymy according to Denmark & Evans 2011). Phytoseius huangi Ehara 1970: 62 (synonymy according to Ehara 2002). Phytoseius jianfengensis Chen, Chu & Zhou 1980: 15 (synonymy according to Wu 1997). This species belongs to the horridus species group as setae J2 and R1 are absent (Chant and McMurtry 1994). It was described from Hong-Kong by Swirski and Shechter (1961) collected on a wide range of plants and very common on citrus. Although species of the genus Phytoseius are considered to belong to the type III (polyphagous generalist predators) of McMurtry and Croft (1997) and McMurtry et al. (2013), its specific biology is totally unknown. World distribution: Australia, China, Hawaii, Hong-Kong, India, Indonesia, Japan, Malaysia, Mauritius, Papua New Guinea, Philippines, Singapore, Tahiti, Taiwan, Thailand, USA. Specimens examined: 4 ♀♀ and 1 ♂ in total. Curepipe, Bld Pasteur (aasl 510 m, lat. 20°19 ′ 21 ″ S, long. 57°31 ′ 45 ″ E), 4 ♀♀ and 1 ♂ on Sphaeropteris cooperi (Hooker ex F. Mueller) R.M. Tryon (Cyatheaceae), 4/XI/2018. Remarks: This species was first reported from Mauritius by Schicha (1984) under the junior synonym name P. hawaiensis. Ferragut and Baumann (2019) recovered the species. Kreiter et al. (2020b) had recently reported this species from Vietnam. Morphological and morphometric characters and all measurements of our specimens fit well measurements in Kreiter et al. (2020b).Published as part of Kreiter, Serge & Abo-Shnaf, Reham I. A., 2020, New records of phytoseiid mites from Mauritius Island (Acari: Mesostigmata, pp. 520-545 in Acarologia 60 (3) on pages 536-537, DOI: 10.24349/acarologia/20204382, http://zenodo.org/record/450344

    Integrated socio-economic assessment : the economic point of view)

    No full text
    This section introduces the main methodologies used by the climate change impact science to assess economically the consequences of climate change. Furthermore it presents the main findings of this literature focusing specifically on possible future economic consequences of climate change in the Mediterranean area emphasizing the new knowledge in this field brought by the CIRCE project. The robust finding of the literature points out a low economic vulnerability of Euro-Mediterranean countries (with losses ranging from −0.25 to −1.4% of GDP for extreme temperature scenarios or even slight gains), and a higher vulnerability of North African and Eastern-Mediterranean countries (of roughly 2% of GDP by the mid of the century). Against this background the CIRCE project proposes one of the first attempts to perform a detailed integrated impact assessment exercise focusing on the Mediterranean area. With the IPCC A1B SRES scenario as ­reference, impacts related to energy demand, sea-level rise and tourism, have been economically assessed by a general equilibrium model. The Mediterranean as a whole loses 1.2% of GDP with the Northern-Mediterranean countries clearly less ­vulnerable than the Southern-Mediterranean ones. Among the former the average loss in 2050 is 0.5% of GDP, while among the latter this more than doubles. Particularly adversely affected are Cyprus, Albania and the Eastern Mediterranean region (−1.6, −2.4, −1.5% of GDP respectively in 2050). In terms of impact types, tourism and sea-level rise are clearly the most threatening, while GDP impacts induced by demand re-composition of energy use is less of an issue and often positiv

    Phytoseius crinitus Swirski & Shechter 1961

    No full text
    Phytoseius crinitus Swirski & Shechter Phytoseius (Dubininellus) crinitus Swirski & Shechter 1961: 102; Amitai & Swirski 1966: 21; Denmark 1966: 66; Swirski & Amitai 1966: 11; Moraes et al. 1986: 220. Phytoseius crinitus, Moraes et al. 2004: 236; Chant & McMurtry 2007: 129. This species belongs to the horridus species group (Chant and McMurtry 1994). It was recorded in several countries of Asia, in Burundi, Madagascar (Demite et al. 2020) and La Réunion (Quilici et al. 2000). The biology of P. crinitus remains totally unknown. World distribution: Burundi, China, Hong Kong, India, Indonesia, Japan, Madagascar Island, Philippines, La Réunion Island, Singapore, Taiwan. Specimens examined: 21 ♀♀ in total. Curepipe, Anderson street (aasl 560 m, lat. 20°19 ′ 11 ″ S, long. 57°31 ′ 52 ″ E), 13 ♀♀ on Litsea glutinosa (Loureiro) Robinson (Lauraceae), 27/X/2018; Curepipe, Botanical Garden (aasl 540 m, lat. 20°19 ′ 28 ″ S, long. 57°30 ′ 50 ″ E), 1 ♀ on Vernicia montana Loureiro (Euphorbiaceae), 29/X/2018; Nouvelle-France (aasl 442 m, lat. 20°22 ′ 34 ″ S, long. 57°35 ′ 58 ″ E), 1 ♀ on Camelia sinensis (L.) Kuntze (Theaceae), 31/X/2018; Belle Rive (aasl 158 m, lat. 20°19 ′ 24 ″ S, long. 57°42 ′ 08 ″ E), 1 ♀ on Acalypha hispida Burman (Euphorbiaceae), 1/XI/2018; Baie du Cap, sea front (aasl 158 m, lat. 20°30 ′ 14 ″ S, long. 57°23 ′ 02 ″ E), 3 ♀♀ on Casuarina equisetifolia L. (Casuarinaceae), 5/XI//2018; Morne-Brabant (aasl 249 m, lat. 20°22 ′ 05 ″ S, long. 57°29 ′ 31 ″ E), 2 ♀♀ on Chromolaena odorata (L.) R.M. King and H. Robinson (Asteraceae), 5/XI/2018. Remarks: this species is the more numerous species of Phytoseius collected in the present study. This was also the case with Ferragut and Baumann (2019) along with Phytoseius haroldi. It was reported for the first time by these authors from Mauritius, but was already reported by Quilici et al. (2000) from Mascareignes Archipelago in La Réunion Island where Kreiter et al. (2020c) had recovered high numbers of the species. Morphological and morphometric characters and all measurements of our specimens fit well measurements in Kreiter et al. (2020c).Published as part of Kreiter, Serge & Abo-Shnaf, Reham I. A., 2020, New records of phytoseiid mites from Mauritius Island (Acari: Mesostigmata, pp. 520-545 in Acarologia 60 (3) on page 537, DOI: 10.24349/acarologia/20204382, http://zenodo.org/record/450344

    Phytoseius crinitus Swirski & Shechter 1961

    No full text
    Phytoseius crinitus Swirski & Shechter Phytoseius (Dubininellus) crinitus Swirski & Shechter 1961: 102. Phytoseius crinitus, Amitai & Swirski 1966: 21 ; Denmark 1966: 66 ; Swirski & Amitai 1966: 11 ; Moraes et al. 1986: 220, 2004: 236; Chant & McMurtry 2007: 129. As the previous species, this species belongs also to the horridus species group (Chant and McMurtry 1994). It was recorded in several countries of Asia, in Burundi, Madagascar (Demite et al. 2020) and La Réunion (Quilici et al. 2000). Its biology remains totally unknown. It was recently recorded in Mauritius Island by Ferragut and Baumann (2019). World distribution: Burundi, China, Hong Kong, India, Indonesia, Japan, Madagascar Island, Philippines, la Réunion Island, Singapore, Taiwan. Specimens examined: a single ♀ specimen collected during this study. Pomoni, exit of the village (34 m aasl, 12°17 ′ 01 ″ S, 44°24 ′ 52 ″ E), 1 ♀ on Hibiscus tiliaceus L. (Malvaceae), 30/XI/2018. Remarks: this species was the more numerous species of Phytoseius collected in Mauritius by Ferragut and Baumann (2019) and Kreiter and Abo­Shnaf (2020b). It was reported for the first time by these authors from Mauritius, but was already reported by Quilici et al. (2000) from Mascareignes Archipelago in La Réunion Island where Kreiter et al. (2020d) had recovered the species, and from Rodrigues Island (Kreiter and abo­Shnaf 2020a). Morphological and morphometric characters of our specimens fit well with those provided by Ueckermann et al. (2007) and Kreiter et al. (2020d).Published as part of Kreiter, Serge, Payet, Rose-My & Azali, Hamza Abdou, 2021, Phytoseiid mites (Acari: Mesostigmata) of Anjouan Island (Comoros Archipelago), pp. 62-83 in Acarologia 61 (1) on page 74, DOI: 10.24349/acarologia/20214418, http://zenodo.org/record/539410

    Co-designing Speakers Corner

    No full text
    “What might a twenty-first century Speakers’ Corner look like and how should the design process ensure that local people can contribute?” The paper considers this question through describing a three year collaboration between MA Creative Practice for Narrative Environments (MACPfNE) at CSM, and the Speakers’ Corner Trust (SCT). SCT is a charity promoting public debate and active citizenship to revitalise civil society in the UK. It pursues its aims by forming local Committees which ‘own’ and steer the establishment of Speakers’ Corners as platforms for public engagement. MACPfNE is an innovative course that encourages multidisciplinary collaboration and the use of narrative as a tool to develop user focused environments. Working closely with SCT, MACPfNE staff and students developed a methodology whereby communities co-create their own physical manifestation of Speakers’ Corner to suit needs and environment. The methodology and its theoretical foundation were developed through a series of live projects, including: a generic mobile Speakers’ Corner prototype, tested at the Global Forum for Freedom of Expression in Oslo; the co-design with local school children, followed by implementation of London’s second Speakers’ Corner in a community park in North London; and a pilot project to co-design Speakers’ Corner in every school playground

    Phytoseius coheni Swirski & Shechter 1961

    No full text
    <i>Phytoseius coheni</i> Swirski & Shechter <p> <i>Phytoseius</i> (<i>Dubininellus</i>) <i>macropilis coheni</i> Swirski & Shechter 1961: 104.</p> <p> <i>Phytoseius</i> (<i>Phytoseius</i>) <i>macropilis coheni</i>, Ehara 1966: 26.</p> <p> <i>Phytoseius</i> (<i>Dubininellus</i>) <i>coheni</i>, Swirski & Golan 1967: 226; Wu 1997: 153.</p> <p> <i>Phytoseius</i> (<i>Phytoseius</i>) <i>coheni</i>, Moraes <i>et al.</i> 1986: 219.</p> <p> <i>Phytoseius coheni</i> Moraes <i>et al.</i>, 2004: 235; Chant & McMurtry 2007: 129.</p> <p> <i>Phytoseius hawaiiensis</i> Prasad 1968: 1460 (synonymy according to Denmark & Evans 2011).</p> <p> <i>Phytoseius huangi</i> Ehara 1970: 62 (synonymy according to Ehara 2002).</p> <p> <i>Phytoseius jianfengensis</i> Chen, Chu & Zhou 1980: 15 (synonymy according to Wu 1997).</p> <p> This species belongs to the <i>horridus</i> species group as setae <i>J2</i> and <i>R1</i> are absent (Chant and McMurtry 1994).</p> <p> This species was described from Hong-Kong by Swirski and Shechter (1961) collected on a wide range of plants and very common on citrus. Although species of the genus <i>Phytoseius</i> are considered to belong to the type III (polyphagous generalist predators) of McMurtry and Croft (1997) and McMurtry <i>et al.</i> (2013), its specific biology is totally unknown.</p> <p> <b>World distribution</b>: Australia, China, Hawaii, Hon-Kong, India, Indonesia, Japan, Malaysia, Mauritius, Papua New Guinea, Philippines, Singapore, Tahiti, Taiwan, Thailand, USA.</p> <p> <b>Specimens examined</b>: a single ♀ during this study. <b>Port-Mathurin</b>, City Center (11 m aasl, lat. 19°40 ′ 53 ″ S, long. 63°25 ′ 17 ″ E), 1 ♀ on <i>Polyscias scutellaria</i> (Burman) Fosberg (Araliaceae), 11/XI/2020.</p> <p> <b>Remarks</b>: this species was firstly reported from Mauritius by Schicha (1984) under the junior synonym name <i>P. hawaiensis</i>. Ferragut and Baumann (2019) recovered the species. Kreiter <i>et al.</i> (2020b) have recently reported this species from Vietnam. Morphological and morphometric characters and all measurements of our specimens fit well with measurements in Kreiter <i>et al.</i> (2020b).</p>Published as part of <i>Kreiter, Serge & Abo-Shnaf, Reham I. A., 2020, Phytoseiid mites of Rodrigues Island (Acari: Mesostigmata), pp. 449-468 in Acarologia 60 (2)</i> on page 460, DOI: 10.24349/acarologia/20204376, <a href="http://zenodo.org/record/4488033">http://zenodo.org/record/4488033</a&gt
    corecore