61,779 research outputs found
Letter from E. P. Setzer to S. B. Simmons
Letter from E. P. Setzer to S. B. Simmons, sending him reports and pictures
Laephotis namibensis Setzer 1971
<p> <i>Laephotis namibensis</i> Setzer, 1971. Proc. Biol. Soc. Wash., 84:259.</p> <p>TYPE LOCALITY: Namibia, Gobabeb, Kuiseb River.</p> <p> DISTRIBUTION: Namibia. Probably S.W. Cape Province (South Africa); reported as <i>L. wintoni</i> by Rautenbach and Nel, 1980, Ann. Transvaal Mus., 32:111.</p>Published as part of <i>James H. Honacki, Kenneth E. Kinman & James W. Koeppl, 1982, Order Chiroptera, pp. 111-215 in Mammal Species of the World (1 st Edition), Lawrence, Kansas, USA :Alien Press, Inc. & The Association of Systematics Collections</i> on page 179, DOI: <a href="http://zenodo.org/record/7352990">10.5281/zenodo.7352990</a>
Cryptotis endersi Setzer 1950
<p> <i>Cryptotis endersi</i> Setzer, 1950. J. Wash. Acad. Sei., 40:300.</p> <p>TYPE LOCALITY: Panama, Chiriqui Bocas del Toro, Cylindro.</p> <p>DISTRIBUTION: Known only from the type locality.</p> <p>ISIS NUMBER: 5301403007006003001.</p>Published as part of <i>James H. Honacki, Kenneth E. Kinman & James W. Koeppl, 1982, Order Insectivora, pp. 58-106 in Mammal Species of the World (1 st Edition), Lawrence, Kansas, USA :Alien Press, Inc. & The Association of Systematics Collections</i> on page 85, DOI: <a href="http://zenodo.org/record/7353001">10.5281/zenodo.7353001</a>
Gerbillus aquilus Schlitter and Setzer 1973
<p> <i>Gerbillus aquilus</i> Schlitter and Setzer, 1973. Proc. Biol. Soc. Wash., 86: 167.</p> <p>TYPE LOCALITY: Iran, 60 km west of Kerman.</p> <p>DISTRIBUTION: S.E. Iran; W. Pakistan; S. Afghanistan.</p> <p> COMMENT: Includes <i>subsolanus</i> as a junior synonym; formerly this species was included in <i>cheesmani</i> by Schlitter and Setzer, 1973; but see Lay and Nadler, 1975, Mammalia, 39:437, 440; also see Corbet, 1978:123.</p>Published as part of <i>James H. Honacki, Kenneth E. Kinman & James W. Koeppl, 1982, Order Rodentia (Part 3), pp. 392-476 in Mammal Species of the World (1 st Edition), Lawrence, Kansas, USA :Alien Press, Inc. & The Association of Systematics Collections</i> on page 413, DOI: <a href="http://zenodo.org/record/7353031">10.5281/zenodo.7353031</a>
Calomyscus grandis Schlitter & Setzer 1973
<i>Calomyscus grandis</i> Schlitter & Setzer, 1973 <p> <i>Calomyscus grandis</i> Schlitter & Setzer, 1973: 163.</p> <p>COMMON NAME. — Noble Brush-tailed Mouse.</p> <p>HOLOTYPE. — Not traced.</p> <p>TYPE LOCALITY. — Northern Iran, Tehran Province, foothills of the Alborz Mountains, 11 km North East of Fasham (35°56’N, 51°31’E) (Schlitter & Setzer 1973).</p> <p> DISTRIBUTION. — This species is known only from the Alborz Mountains in Northern Iran. There are records from the foothills of Alborz Mountains near Fasham, the Southern foothills and ridges (2590 m a.s.l.) of the Mount Demavend, Doab on the crest of the central Alborz Mountains, and on the Northern slopes of the Alborz Mountains in Mazandaran Province at Abass-Abad (36°44’N, 51°08’E) (Norris <i>et al.</i> 2008; Kryštufek & Voharlik 2009).</p> <p> HABITAT. — It is likely to occur in mountain forests (Norris <i>et al.</i> 2008). Kilpatrick (2017) identifies habitats as rocky hillsides, along rock walls of gardens, and on vegetated rocky outcropings along crested hills and along the flanks of higher mountains.</p> <p>IUCN. — Data deficient.</p> <p> REFERENCES. — Schlitter & Setzer (1973); Karami <i>et al.</i> (2008); Norris <i>et al.</i> (2008); Kryštufek & Voharlik (2009); Kilpatrick (2017).</p> <p>REMARK</p> <p> Description postdates Lay (1967). The limits of its distribution remain unresolved and this species almost certainly occurs more widely than current records suggest, though it is likely to be endemic to the Alborz Mountains (Karami <i>et al.</i> 2008).</p> <p> Family CRICETIDAE Fischer, 1817 Genus <i>Microtus</i> Schrank, 1798</p>Published as part of <i>Eskandarzadeh, Naeimeh, Rastegar-Pouyani, Nasrullah, Rastegar-Pouyani, Eskandar, Fathinia, Behzad, Bahmani, Zahed, Hamidi, Kordiyeh & Gholamifard, Ali, 2018, Annotated checklist of the endemic Tetrapoda species of Iran, pp. 507-537 in Zoosystema 40 (24)</i> on page 528, DOI: 10.5252/zoosystema2018v40a24, <a href="http://zenodo.org/record/4336795">http://zenodo.org/record/4336795</a>
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
The present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
Dispelling the Myths Behind First-author Citation Counts
We conducted a full-scale evaluative citation analysis study of scholars in the XML research field to explore just how different from each other author rankings resulting from different citation counting methods actually are, and to demonstrate the capability of emerging data and tools on the Web in supporting more realistic citation counting methods. Our results contest some common arguments for the continued
use of first-author citation counts in the evaluation of scholars, such as high correlations between author rankings by first-author citation counts and other citation
counting methods, and high costs of using more realistic citation counting methods that are not well-supported by the ISI databases. It is argued that increasingly available digital full text research papers make it possible for citation analysis studies to go beyond what the ISI databases have directly supported and to employ more
sophisticated methods
Subspecies and Distribution. G.p.pyramidumEGeoffroySaint-Hilaire,1803—NEgypt. G. p. elbaensis Setzer, 1958 — SE Egypt and NE Sudan (SE Eastern Desert). G. p. gedeedus Osborn & Helmy, 1980 — known from a few oases in Egypt. Also present in W Mauritania, and from Mali E to Sudan, but subspecies involved not known. in Muridae
Subspecies and Distribution. G.p.pyramidumEGeoffroySaint-Hilaire,1803—NEgypt. G. p. elbaensis Setzer, 1958 — SE Egypt and NE Sudan (SE Eastern Desert). G. p. gedeedus Osborn & Helmy, 1980 — known from a few oases in Egypt. Also present in W Mauritania, and from Mali E to Sudan, but subspecies involved not known.Published as part of Don E. Wilson, Russell A. Mittermeier & Thomas E. Lacher, Jr, 2017, Muridae, pp. 536-884 in Handbook of the Mammals of the World – Volume 7 Rodents II, Barcelona :Lynx Edicions on page 635, DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.688726
Solving Differential Equations in R: Package deSolve
In this paper we present the R package deSolve to solve initial value problems (IVP) written as ordinary differential equations (ODE), differential algebraic equations (DAE) of index 0 or 1 and partial differential equations (PDE), the latter solved using the method of lines approach. The differential equations can be represented in R code or as compiled code. In the latter case, R is used as a tool to trigger the integration and post-process the results, which facilitates model development and application, whilst the compiled code significantly increases simulation speed. The methods implemented are efficient, robust, and well documented public-domain Fortran routines. They include four integrators from the ODEPACK package (LSODE, LSODES, LSODA, LSODAR), DVODE and DASPK2.0. In addition, a suite of Runge-Kutta integrators and special-purpose solvers to efficiently integrate 1-, 2- and 3-dimensional partial differential equations are available. The routines solve both stiff and non-stiff systems, and include many options, e.g., to deal in an efficient way with the sparsity of the Jacobian matrix, or finding the root of equations. In this article, our objectives are threefold: (1) to demonstrate the potential of using R for dynamic modeling, (2) to highlight typical uses of the different methods implemented and (3) to compare the performance of models specified in R code and in compiled code for a number of test cases. These comparisons demonstrate that, if the use of loops is avoided, R code can efficiently integrate problems comprising several thousands of state variables. Nevertheless, the same problem may be solved from 2 to more than 50 times faster by using compiled code compared to an implementation using only R code. Still, amongst the benefits of R are a more flexible and interactive implementation, better readability of the code, and access to RâÂÂs high-level procedures. deSolve is the successor of package odesolve which will be deprecated in the future; it is free software and distributed under the GNU General Public License, as part of the R software project.
- …
