1,720,961 research outputs found

    Can hair width and scale pattern and direction of dorsal scapular mammalian hair be a relatively simple means to identify species?

    No full text
    Sessions, Britten D., Hess, Wilford M., Wesley, Skip, Skidmore (2009): Can hair width and scale pattern and direction of dorsal scapular mammalian hair be a relatively simple means to identify species? Journal of Natural History 43 (7-8): 489-507, DOI: 10.1080/00222930802267187, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0022293080226718

    Figure 10 in Can hair width and scale pattern and direction of dorsal scapular mammalian hair be a relatively simple means to identify species?

    No full text
    Figure 10. Boxplot of 30 guard hair widths for each species including quartile ranges.Published as part of Sessions, Britten D., Hess, Wilford M., Wesley, Skip & Skidmore, 2009, Can hair width and scale pattern and direction of dorsal scapular mammalian hair be a relatively simple means to identify species?, pp. 489-507 in Journal of Natural History 43 (7-8) on page 505, DOI: 10.1080/00222930802267187, http://zenodo.org/record/521844

    Figure 6 in Can hair width and scale pattern and direction of dorsal scapular mammalian hair be a relatively simple means to identify species?

    No full text
    Figure 6. Scanning electron micrographs of mammalian hair. Merriam's shrew guard hair (A); broad-footed mole guard hair (C, F) and underfur (B, D, E).Published as part of Sessions, Britten D., Hess, Wilford M., Wesley, Skip & Skidmore, 2009, Can hair width and scale pattern and direction of dorsal scapular mammalian hair be a relatively simple means to identify species?, pp. 489-507 in Journal of Natural History 43 (7-8) on page 501, DOI: 10.1080/00222930802267187, http://zenodo.org/record/521844

    Figure 5 in Can hair width and scale pattern and direction of dorsal scapular mammalian hair be a relatively simple means to identify species?

    No full text
    Figure 5. Scanning electron micrographs of mammalian hair. Pallid bat underfur (A); Virginia opossum guard hair (B) and underfur (C); Merriam's shrew guard hair (D, E) and underfur (F).Published as part of Sessions, Britten D., Hess, Wilford M., Wesley, Skip & Skidmore, 2009, Can hair width and scale pattern and direction of dorsal scapular mammalian hair be a relatively simple means to identify species?, pp. 489-507 in Journal of Natural History 43 (7-8) on page 500, DOI: 10.1080/00222930802267187, http://zenodo.org/record/521844

    Figure 4 in Can hair width and scale pattern and direction of dorsal scapular mammalian hair be a relatively simple means to identify species?

    No full text
    Figure 4. Scanning electron micrographs of mammalian hair. Northern raccoon guard hair (A) and underfur (B); American black bear guard hair (C) and underfur (D); pallid bat underfur (E, F).Published as part of Sessions, Britten D., Hess, Wilford M., Wesley, Skip & Skidmore, 2009, Can hair width and scale pattern and direction of dorsal scapular mammalian hair be a relatively simple means to identify species?, pp. 489-507 in Journal of Natural History 43 (7-8) on page 499, DOI: 10.1080/00222930802267187, http://zenodo.org/record/521844

    Figure 9 in Can hair width and scale pattern and direction of dorsal scapular mammalian hair be a relatively simple means to identify species?

    No full text
    Figure 9. Scanning electron micrographs of mammalian hair. Little pocket mouse underfur (A); muskrat guard hair (B) and underfur (C); gold mantled ground squirrel guard hair (D, E) and underfur (F).Published as part of Sessions, Britten D., Hess, Wilford M., Wesley, Skip & Skidmore, 2009, Can hair width and scale pattern and direction of dorsal scapular mammalian hair be a relatively simple means to identify species?, pp. 489-507 in Journal of Natural History 43 (7-8) on page 504, DOI: 10.1080/00222930802267187, http://zenodo.org/record/521844

    Figure 1 in Can hair width and scale pattern and direction of dorsal scapular mammalian hair be a relatively simple means to identify species?

    No full text
    Figure 1. Scanning electron micrographs of mammalian hair. Bighorn sheep guard hair (A) and underfur (B); elk guard hair (C) and underfur (D); white tailed deer guard hair (E) and underfur (F).Published as part of Sessions, Britten D., Hess, Wilford M., Wesley, Skip & Skidmore, 2009, Can hair width and scale pattern and direction of dorsal scapular mammalian hair be a relatively simple means to identify species?, pp. 489-507 in Journal of Natural History 43 (7-8) on page 495, DOI: 10.1080/00222930802267187, http://zenodo.org/record/521844

    Figure 2 in Can hair width and scale pattern and direction of dorsal scapular mammalian hair be a relatively simple means to identify species?

    No full text
    Figure 2. Scanning electron micrographs of mammalian hair. Coyote guard hair (A) and underfur (B); red fox guard hair (C) and underfur (D); cougar guard hair (E) and underfur (F).Published as part of Sessions, Britten D., Hess, Wilford M., Wesley, Skip & Skidmore, 2009, Can hair width and scale pattern and direction of dorsal scapular mammalian hair be a relatively simple means to identify species?, pp. 489-507 in Journal of Natural History 43 (7-8) on page 496, DOI: 10.1080/00222930802267187, http://zenodo.org/record/521844

    Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis

    Get PDF
    The present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
    corecore