1,720,993 research outputs found
Systemic lupus erythematosus and atherosclerosis progression risk:comment on the article by Papazoglou et al.
Full text linkLetter to the editor:Inadequate identification of high cardiovascular risk and carotid plaques in rheumatoid arthritis patients by the 2024 Predicting Risk of Cardiovascular EVENTs and the 2013 Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease algorithms: findings from a Mexican cohort
Full text link
Letter to the editor:Cardiovascular risk according to biological agent exposure in patients with ankylosing spondylitis: a nationwide population-based study
Full text link
Optimizing Patient Selection for Revascularization in Chronic Coronary Syndrome: Rethinking Strategies for Improved Outcomes
No full textCurrent guidelines regarding the revascularization of patients with chronic coronary syndromes remains equivocal and while providing a general opinion, many frequently encountered situations in daily practice are still uncovered. Novel studies and trials are aiming to find the determinants of improved outcomes after revascularization and give an insight to the clinicians in decision making. Despite the controversial results, it seems that more detailed and precise indications are to be defined in the future. This review provides an overview of the current guidelines and clinical trials on revascularization in chronic coronary syndromes. It highlights the importance of complete revascularization, the need for longer follow-up periods, and the value of functional and anatomical assessments in guiding treatment decisions. Furthermore, the review incorporates illustrative figures to aid in comprehending complex concepts
Key Points in the Association of Rheumatoid Arthritis With Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events and Malignancies
No full textComment on:Renal arteriosclerosis in kidney biopsies associated with higher 10-year atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease in lupus nephritis
Full text link
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
Full text linkThe present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
- …
