1,721,104 research outputs found

    Comment on the manuscript “Histological subtype is associated with PD-L1 expression and CD8+ T-cell infiltrates in triple-negative breast carcinoma” by Salisbury et al. (Ann Diagn Pathol 2022; 57: 151901, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anndiagpath.2022.151901)

    Full text link
    I read with great interest a recent paper written by Salisbury et al. published in the April 2022 issue of the Annals of Diagnostic Pathology [1]. In their study, the authors explored a small cohort of triple-negative breast carcinomas (TNBC) for biomarkers of response to immune checkpoint inhibitors. They also analyzed the tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes, the percentage and ratio between the CD4+ and CD8+ T-cells. The topic is highly relevant given the recent “booming” and advances in the field followed by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approvals of immune checkpoint inhibitors for the treatment of TNBC: Atezolizumab, which was initially approved and then withdrawn voluntarily by Genentech in August 2021, and pembrolizumab, which was approved in July 2021. For the PD-L1 assessment, the authors employed two corresponding and approved companion diagnostic (CDx) tests, namely SP142 (Ventana) and 22C3 (Agilent) antibodies, revealing some essential discrepancies that had been previously reported. Notably, they also used two different scoring systems for the two antibodies of which combined positive score (CPS) also takes into account the PD-L1 expression in the tumors cells (CPS = “Number of PD-L1–positive cells/Tumor cells, lymphocytes, and macrophages/divided by the total number of viable tumor cells in the assessed area, multiplied by 100”). However, they did not report the PD-L1 expression in the tumor cells, which would be helpful to know. In addition, some images highlighting the observed discrepancies would be very welcome for pathology journals like Annals of Diagnostic Pathology. In my experience, some cancers like metaplastic (spindle cell variant) carcinoma frequently exhibit PD-L1 expression on the tumor cells [2]. Although they had a small metaplastic carcinoma cohort (n = 5), they did not provide the morphologic subtypes of metaplastic carcinomas. On the other hand, apocrine carcinomas tend to be PD-L1 negative, as confirmed in this study. In addition, apocrine carcinomas exhibit a low tumor mutational burden (TMB) and are microsatellite stable (MSS), as reported in several recent studies [3], [4], [5]. The molecular features make apocrine carcinoma patients less likely to benefit from immune checkpoint inhibitors

    Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis

    Full text link
    The present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed

    Variations on the Author

    Full text link
    “Variations on the Author” discusses two of Eduardo Coutinho’s recent films (Um Dia na Vida, from 2010, and Últimas Conversas, posthumously released in 2015) and their contribution to the general question of documentary authorship. The director’s filmography is characterized by a consistent yet self-effacing form of authorial self-inscription: Coutinho often features as an interviewer that rather than express opinions propels discourses; an interviewer that is good at listening. This mode of self-inscription characterizes him as an author who is not expressive but who is nonetheless markedly present on the screen. In Um Dia na Vida, however, Coutinho is completely absent form the image, while Últimas Conversas, on the contrary, includes a confessional prologue that moves the director from the margins to the center of his films. This article examines the ways in which these works stand out in the filmography of a director who offers new insights into the notion of cinematic authorship

    Microsatellite instability status predicts response to anti-PD-1/PD-L1 therapy regardless the histotype: A comment on recent advances

    Full text link
    It is well-known that somatic mutations resulting in increased number of neoantigens (“immunogenic antigens”) may enhance anti-tumor immune cell reaction. Also, high tumor mutation burden (load) [TML] is associated with improved response, durable clinical benefits and better outcome if a cancer is treated with immune check point inhibitors [anti-programmed cell death protein 1/programmed death-ligand 1 (anti-PD-1/PD-L1) drugs] [1]. A subset of colorectal carcinomas (CRC) and other cancers characterized by mismatch repair deficiency (MMR) and/or microsatellite instability high (MSI-H) profiles may be particularly sensitive to the PD-1/PD-L1 blockade with immune check point inhibitors due to the common PD-L1/PD-L1 expression [2-9]. Several therapeutic antibodies inhibiting either PD-1 (nivolumab, pembrolizumab) or PD-L1 (MPDL3280A, Medi4736, BMS-936559) have been developed and approved for the treatment of various malignancies including malignant melanoma, non-small cell lung carcinoma, renal cell carcinoma, bladder carcinoma, Merkel cell carcinoma, and classical Hodgkin lymphoma [10].&#x0D; A pivotal phase 2 study by Le et al. [11] highlighted the importance of mismatch-repair status in prediction of the clinical benefit of immune checkpoint blockade with pembrolizumab (anti-PD-1 drug) [11]. The study included 41 patients with progressive cancers of both CRC and non-colorectal origins and known MSI status. For CRC patients, the objective response rate and progression-free survival rate were 40% and 78%, respectively for mismatch repair-deficient tumors and 0% and 11% for mismatch repair-proficient CRCs.&#x0D; A novel study by Le et al. [12] (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01876511) represents an extended analysis on the efficacy of PD-1 blockade in patients with advanced mismatch repair-deficient cancers. The study included 86 patients with 12 different histologic cancer subtypes and proved mismatch repair-deficiency status assessed by either polymerase chain reaction (PCR) or immunohistochemistry. The data presented in this study indicate objective radiographic responses in 53% of patients while complete responses were achieved in 21% of patients. Based on this and previous data, on May 23, 2017, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) granted accelerated approval to anti-PD-L1 drug pembrolizumab (KEYTRUDA®, Merck &amp; Co.) for adult and pediatric patients with unresectable/metastatic MSI-H/MMR deficient solid tumors (regardless the histotype) that have progressed following prior treatment and without satisfactory alternative treatment modalities. The approval also covered MSI-H CRC patients who progressed following treatment with a classic cytotoxic therapy (fluoropyrimidine, oxaliplatin, and irinotecan).&#x0D; Taken together, these results revolutionize the cancer treatment paradigm as for the first time the cancer treatment was based solely on the molecular characteristics of cancer (in this case microsatellite instability/MSI/ status) regardless the tumor morphology (histotype). This appears to be “the FDA’s first tissue/site-agnostic approval”.&#x0D; Certainly, there are still ongoing but unresolved issues regarding these treatments including other merging predictive biomarkers (optimization of PD-L1 and PD-1 evaluation, e.g. tumor versus immune cell expression; cutoffs for positivity; selection of detection antibodies), tumor mutational load and the tumor neoantigen heterogeneity/specificity [13-15]. Further studies should also elucidate the mechanisms of recently described resistance to immune checkpoint inhibitors [16-18].</jats:p

    Appropriate Similarity Measures for Author Cocitation Analysis

    Full text link
    We provide a number of new insights into the methodological discussion about author cocitation analysis. We first argue that the use of the Pearson correlation for measuring the similarity between authors’ cocitation profiles is not very satisfactory. We then discuss what kind of similarity measures may be used as an alternative to the Pearson correlation. We consider three similarity measures in particular. One is the well-known cosine. The other two similarity measures have not been used before in the bibliometric literature. Finally, we show by means of an example that our findings have a high practical relevance.information science;Pearson correlation;cosine;similarity measure;author cocitation analysis

    An Update on the Molecular and Clinical Characteristics of Apocrine Carcinoma of the Breast

    Full text link
    Apocrine carcinoma of the breast is a rare malignancy. According to 2019 WHO classification, apocrine cellular features and a characteristic steroid receptor profile (Estrogen receptor (ER)-negative and androgen receptor (AR)-positive) define apocrine carcinoma. Her-2/neu protein expression is reported in ∼30-50% of apocrine carcinomas, while NGS analysis showed frequent PIK3CA/PTEN/AKT and TP53 mutations Followed by deregulation in the mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) pathway components (mutations of KRAS, NRAS, BRAF). A recent miRNA study indicates various miRNAs (downregulated hsa-miR-145-5p and upregulated 14 miRNAs such as hsa-miR-182-5p, hsa-miR-3135b, and hsa-miR-4417) may target the commonly altered pathways in apocrine carcinomas such as ERBB2/HER2 and MAPK signaling pathway. Although AR expression is a hallmark of apocrine carcinoma, little is known regarding the efficacy/resistance to antiandrogens. Success of bicalutamide, a non-steroidal anti-androgen, was reported in a case of Her2-negative apocrine carcinoma. Two recent studies, however, described presence of anti-androgen resistance biomarkers (a splice variant ARv7 and AR/NCOA2 co-amplification) in a subset of AR+ apocrine carcinomas, cautioning the use of anti-androgens in AR+ triple-negative breast carcinomas. Apocrine carcinomas rarely show biomarkers predictive of response to immune checkpoint inhibitors (PD-L1 expression, MSI-H status, and TMB-high). Therefore, a comprehensive cancer profiling of apocrine carcinomas is necessary to identify potential therapeutic targets for a truly individualized treatment approach

    Sacituzumab govitecan expands its therapeutic spectrum among breast cancer subtypes

    Full text link
    Antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) are novel, highly potent drugs composed of a small molecule of an anticancer drug (payload) attached to humanized antibody recognizing an epitope on the surface of cancer cells. ADCs are rapidly expanding in the oncology field. By 2022, >180 ADC-based clinical trials have been conducted [1]. Most of these clinical trials are in phases I or II [1]. Several ADCs have been approved and used for the treatment of various malignancies (e.g., brentuximab vedotin (BV) for the treatment of CD30+ lymphomas, trastuzumab emtansine (T-DM1) for advanced/metastatic/or early-stage high-risk HER2-positive breast cancer with residual disease after neoadjuvant treatment) [2]. Read more in the PDF

    Dispelling the Myths Behind First-author Citation Counts

    Full text link
    We conducted a full-scale evaluative citation analysis study of scholars in the XML research field to explore just how different from each other author rankings resulting from different citation counting methods actually are, and to demonstrate the capability of emerging data and tools on the Web in supporting more realistic citation counting methods. Our results contest some common arguments for the continued use of first-author citation counts in the evaluation of scholars, such as high correlations between author rankings by first-author citation counts and other citation counting methods, and high costs of using more realistic citation counting methods that are not well-supported by the ISI databases. It is argued that increasingly available digital full text research papers make it possible for citation analysis studies to go beyond what the ISI databases have directly supported and to employ more sophisticated methods

    Author Index

    No full text
    Nao informado
    corecore