124,624 research outputs found
OPUS Seti API
<p>Python package to use OPUS (NASA-PDS/Seti) search tool API (version v2).</p>
<p><strong>Install</strong></p>
<p>With <code>pip</code>:</p>
<pre><code class="language-bash"> pip install opus-seti</code></pre>
<p>With the <code>source files</code>:</p>
<pre><code class="language-bash"> git clone https://github.com/seignovert/python-opus-seti.git
$ cd opus-seti ; python setup.py install</code></pre>
<p><strong>Usage</strong></p>
<p>In bash CLI:</p>
<pre><code class="language-bash">opus -h # For help
opus --planet Saturn --target pan
cassini-vims TITAN --limit 5</code></pre>
<p>Within python</p>
<pre><code class="language-python">>>> from opus import api
>>> api.data(planet='Saturn', target='pan', limit=10)
OPUS API Data objects (with 10 elements):
- S_IMG_CO_ISS_1480614021_N
- S_IMG_CO_ISS_1488190255_N
- S_IMG_CO_ISS_1488273311_N
- S_IMG_CO_ISS_1488368442_N
- S_IMG_CO_ISS_1488485562_N
- S_IMG_CO_ISS_1488551713_N
- S_IMG_CO_ISS_1488711044_N
- S_IMG_CO_ISS_1488745124_N
- S_IMG_CO_ISS_1488812400_N
- S_IMG_CO_ISS_1488826725_N</code></pre>
<p>More examples are available in this <a href="https://nbviewer.jupyter.org/github/seignovert/python-opus-seti/blob/master/jupyter_notebooks/examples.ipynb">Jupyter Notebook</a>.</p>
<p><strong>Note</strong></p>
<p><em>IMPORTANT:</em> I have no current affiliation with NASA or SETI. The package is provided <em>as is</em>, use at your own risk.</p>
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
The present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
Dispelling the Myths Behind First-author Citation Counts
We conducted a full-scale evaluative citation analysis study of scholars in the XML research field to explore just how different from each other author rankings resulting from different citation counting methods actually are, and to demonstrate the capability of emerging data and tools on the Web in supporting more realistic citation counting methods. Our results contest some common arguments for the continued
use of first-author citation counts in the evaluation of scholars, such as high correlations between author rankings by first-author citation counts and other citation
counting methods, and high costs of using more realistic citation counting methods that are not well-supported by the ISI databases. It is argued that increasingly available digital full text research papers make it possible for citation analysis studies to go beyond what the ISI databases have directly supported and to employ more
sophisticated methods
Material for VIMS-IR uncertainties estimations
The material available here is a supplementary material related to the paper Photometric Uncertainties of Cassini VIMS-IR Instrument submitted to Icarus by Cordier, D., Seignovert, B., Le Mouélic, S. and Sotin, C.The main goal of this work is to estimate photometric uncertainties remaining in VIMS-IR cubes after calibration using USGS ISIS3 tool, the employed method relies on the definition of a collection of 3x3 pixels picked-up in each considered cube. Within each individual block, for a given spectral channel, the variability of photometric quantities is computed. The mean relative variability gives an approximation of uncertainties
Pragmatic Case Studies as a Source of Unity in Applied Psychology
To unify or not to unify applied psychology: that is the question. In this article we review pendulum swings in the historical efforts to answer this question—from a comprehensive, positivist, “top-down,” deductive yes between the 1930s and the early 60s, to a postmodern no since then. A rationale and proposal for a limited, “bottom-up,” inductive yes in applied psychology is then presented, employing a case-based paradigm that integrates both positivist and postmodern themes and components. This paradigm is labeled “pragmatic psychology” and, its specific use of case studies, the “Pragmatic Case Study Method” (“PCS Method”). We call for the creation of peer-reviewed journal-databases of pragmatic case studies as a foundational source of unifying applied knowledge in our discipline. As one example, the potential of the PCS Method for unifying different angles of theoretical regard is illustrated in an area of applied psychology, psychotherapy, via the case of Mrs. B. The article then turns to the broader historical and epistemological arguments for the unifying nature of the PCS Method in both applied and basic psychology.Peer reviewe
Titan's global map combining VIMS and ISS mosaics
Titan global map merging VIMS and ISS datasets, details were presented by B. Seignovert et al. at LPSC 2019 and EPSC/DPS 2019 (cf. related identifiers).Original maps: VIMS map published by S. Le Mouélic in Icarus 2019
(doi: 10.1016/j.icarus.2018.09.017) with R band at 1.59/1.27 μm, G band at 2.03/1.27 μm, B band: 1.27/1.08 μm.
Seamless ISS global map by Cassini Imaging Team published in Dec. 2018
(Photo Journal: PIA-22770) with B/W: albedo map at 938 nm.Copyrights: Caltech-JPL/Univ. of Arizona/LPG-Univ. of Nantes-CNRS | JPL: CL#19-0905Related Publication:
Titan's global map combining VIMS and ISS mosaics
B. Seignovert Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA, USA
S. Le Mouélic LPG, UMR 6112, CNRS, Université de Nantes, 2 rue de la Houssinière, Nantes, France
R. H. Brown Department of Planetary Sciences, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, USA
E. Karkoschka Department of Planetary Sciences, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, USA
V. Pasek Department of Planetary Sciences, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, USA
C. Sotin Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA, USA
E. P. Turtle Johns Hopkins Applied Physics Laboratory, Laurel, MD, USA
EPSC-DPS Joint Meeting 2019 | 50th Lunar and Planetary Science Conference (LPSC)
2019-03-21
en
Dr. Edwin Wright Collection: Author Unknown
Notes - The author relates several short stories about his neighbours including Alex McDonell, homesteading and life around Meanook and Athabasca (1 page
- …
