1,721,451 research outputs found

    L’evoluzione della concorrenza e la sorte della regolazione dei mercati nei settori a rete

    No full text
    The article analyzes critically the evolution of the essential facilities doctrine from the stand point of both antitrust law and economic theory, following the evolution of competition. The final purpose of the analysis is to assess the adequacy of the current regulations of the access to the infrastructures and the need to adapt policies to the development of markets

    Le gestioni aeroportuali fra Stato e mercato

    No full text
    The article addresses the problem of regulating the access to the airport infrastructures, both under the antitrust and of airport charges’ regulation side, taking into account the evolution of competition in the airports and among the airports

    Infrastrutture e servizi a rete fra regolazione e concorrenza. Spunti per una politica delle infrastrutture di trasporto

    No full text
    The work aims to provide policy proposals for transport infrastructures, with particular emphasis on constraints, criticality and the opportunities provided by the processes of liberalisation, regulation and privatization of the sector. The basic theme that is addressed is if, to what extent and under what conditions the process of liberalisation and privatisation represent obstacles or an opportunities for industrial, social and regulatory policies aimed at an efficient government of the mobility. And, on the other hand, if and to what extent the pursuit of this objective could encourage or slow down the processes mentioned

    Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis

    Full text link
    The present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
    corecore