1,720,982 research outputs found

    sj-pdf-1-wso-10.1177_17474930211070682 – Supplemental material for Vascular risk factors and stroke risk across the life span: A population-representative study of half a million people

    No full text
    Supplemental material, sj-pdf-1-wso-10.1177_17474930211070682 for Vascular risk factors and stroke risk across the life span: A population-representative study of half a million people by Raed A Joundi, Scott B Patten, Jeanne VA Williams and Eric E Smith in International Journal of Stroke</p

    sj-docx-2-his-10.1177_11786329231183317 – Supplemental material for Identifying Unique Subgroups of High-Cost Patients With Schizophrenia: A Population-Based Study Using Latent Class Analysis

    No full text
    Supplemental material, sj-docx-2-his-10.1177_11786329231183317 for Identifying Unique Subgroups of High-Cost Patients With Schizophrenia: A Population-Based Study Using Latent Class Analysis by Andrew J Stewart, Scott B Patten, Kirsten M Fiest, Tyler S Williamson, James P Wick and Paul E Ronksley in Health Services Insights</p

    sj-docx-3-his-10.1177_11786329231183317 – Supplemental material for Identifying Unique Subgroups of High-Cost Patients With Schizophrenia: A Population-Based Study Using Latent Class Analysis

    No full text
    Supplemental material, sj-docx-3-his-10.1177_11786329231183317 for Identifying Unique Subgroups of High-Cost Patients With Schizophrenia: A Population-Based Study Using Latent Class Analysis by Andrew J Stewart, Scott B Patten, Kirsten M Fiest, Tyler S Williamson, James P Wick and Paul E Ronksley in Health Services Insights</p

    sj-docx-1-his-10.1177_11786329231183317 – Supplemental material for Identifying Unique Subgroups of High-Cost Patients With Schizophrenia: A Population-Based Study Using Latent Class Analysis

    No full text
    Supplemental material, sj-docx-1-his-10.1177_11786329231183317 for Identifying Unique Subgroups of High-Cost Patients With Schizophrenia: A Population-Based Study Using Latent Class Analysis by Andrew J Stewart, Scott B Patten, Kirsten M Fiest, Tyler S Williamson, James P Wick and Paul E Ronksley in Health Services Insights</p

    sj-docx-1-mso-10.1177_20552173231188469 - Supplemental material for Pain and participation in social activities in people with relapsing remitting and progressive multiple sclerosis

    No full text
    Supplemental material, sj-docx-1-mso-10.1177_20552173231188469 for Pain and participation in social activities in people with relapsing remitting and progressive multiple sclerosis by Dhruv Jain, Charles N Bernstein, Lesley A Graff, Scott B Patten, James M Bolton, John D Fisk, Carol Hitchon, James J Marriott, Ruth Ann Marrie and in Multiple Sclerosis Journal – Experimental, Translational and Clinical</p

    sj-pdf-1-jso-10.1177_23971983241241593 – Supplemental material for Physical activity during COVID-19 in people with systemic sclerosis: A Scleroderma Patient-centred Intervention Network COVID-19 Cohort longitudinal study

    No full text
    Supplemental material, sj-pdf-1-jso-10.1177_23971983241241593 for Physical activity during COVID-19 in people with systemic sclerosis: A Scleroderma Patient-centred Intervention Network COVID-19 Cohort longitudinal study by Amanda Wurz, Richard S Henry, Linda Kwakkenbos, Marie-Eve Carrier, Scott B Patten, Susan J Bartlett, Luc Mouthon, John Varga, Andrea Benedetti, S Nicole Culos-Reed and Brett D Thombs in Journal of Scleroderma and Related Disorders</p

    Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis

    Full text link
    The present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed

    Variations on the Author

    Full text link
    “Variations on the Author” discusses two of Eduardo Coutinho’s recent films (Um Dia na Vida, from 2010, and Últimas Conversas, posthumously released in 2015) and their contribution to the general question of documentary authorship. The director’s filmography is characterized by a consistent yet self-effacing form of authorial self-inscription: Coutinho often features as an interviewer that rather than express opinions propels discourses; an interviewer that is good at listening. This mode of self-inscription characterizes him as an author who is not expressive but who is nonetheless markedly present on the screen. In Um Dia na Vida, however, Coutinho is completely absent form the image, while Últimas Conversas, on the contrary, includes a confessional prologue that moves the director from the margins to the center of his films. This article examines the ways in which these works stand out in the filmography of a director who offers new insights into the notion of cinematic authorship

    Appropriate Similarity Measures for Author Cocitation Analysis

    Full text link
    We provide a number of new insights into the methodological discussion about author cocitation analysis. We first argue that the use of the Pearson correlation for measuring the similarity between authors’ cocitation profiles is not very satisfactory. We then discuss what kind of similarity measures may be used as an alternative to the Pearson correlation. We consider three similarity measures in particular. One is the well-known cosine. The other two similarity measures have not been used before in the bibliometric literature. Finally, we show by means of an example that our findings have a high practical relevance.information science;Pearson correlation;cosine;similarity measure;author cocitation analysis
    corecore