1,720,957 research outputs found
A Case Study on Colposcopy-Based Cervical Cancer Staging Reveals an Alarming Lack of Data Sharing Hindering the Adoption of Machine Learning in Clinical Practice
No full textA re‐analysis of about 60,000 sparse data meta‐analyses suggests that using an adequate method for pooling matters
No full textAbstract In sparse data meta‐analyses (with few trials or zero events), conventional methods may distort results. Although better‐performing one‐stage methods have become available in recent years, their implementation remains limited in practice. This study examines the impact of using conventional methods compared to one‐stage models by re‐analysing meta‐analyses from the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews in scenarios with zero event trials and few trials. For each scenario, we computed one‐stage methods (Generalised linear mixed model [GLMM], Beta‐binomial model [BBM], Bayesian binomial‐normal hierarchical model using a weakly informative prior [BNHM‐WIP]) and compared them with conventional methods (Peto‐Odds‐ratio [PETO], DerSimonian‐Laird method [DL] for zero event trials; DL, Paule‐Mandel [PM], Restricted maximum likelihood [REML] method for few trials). While all methods showed similar treatment effect estimates, substantial variability in statistical precision emerged. Conventional methods generally resulted in smaller confidence intervals (CIs) compared to one‐stage models in the zero event situation. In the few trials scenario, the CI lengths were widest for the BBM on average and significance often changed compared to the PM and REML, despite the relatively wide CIs of the latter. In agreement with simulations and guidelines for meta‐analyses with zero event trials, our results suggest that one‐stage models are preferable. The best model can be either selected based on the data situation or, using a method that can be used in various situations. In the few trial situation, using BBM and additionally PM or REML for sensitivity analyses appears reasonable when conservative results are desired. Overall, our results encourage careful method selection
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
Full text linkThe present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
Variations on the Author
Full text link“Variations on the Author” discusses two of Eduardo Coutinho’s recent films (Um Dia na Vida, from 2010, and Últimas Conversas, posthumously released in 2015) and their contribution to the general question of documentary authorship. The director’s filmography is characterized by a consistent yet self-effacing form of authorial self-inscription: Coutinho often features as an interviewer that rather than express opinions propels discourses; an interviewer that is good at listening. This mode of self-inscription characterizes him as an author who is not expressive but who is nonetheless markedly present on the screen. In Um Dia na Vida, however, Coutinho is completely absent form the image, while Últimas Conversas, on the contrary, includes a confessional prologue that moves the director from the margins to the center of his films. This article examines the ways in which these works stand out in the filmography of a director who offers new insights into the notion of cinematic authorship
Appropriate Similarity Measures for Author Cocitation Analysis
Full text linkWe provide a number of new insights into the methodological discussion about author cocitation analysis. We first argue that the use of the Pearson correlation for measuring the similarity between authors’ cocitation profiles is not very satisfactory. We then discuss what kind of similarity measures may be used as an alternative to the Pearson correlation. We consider three similarity measures in particular. One is the well-known cosine. The other two similarity measures have not been used before in the bibliometric literature. Finally, we show by means of an example that our findings have a high practical relevance.information science;Pearson correlation;cosine;similarity measure;author cocitation analysis
Dispelling the Myths Behind First-author Citation Counts
Full text linkWe conducted a full-scale evaluative citation analysis study of scholars in the XML research field to explore just how different from each other author rankings resulting from different citation counting methods actually are, and to demonstrate the capability of emerging data and tools on the Web in supporting more realistic citation counting methods. Our results contest some common arguments for the continued
use of first-author citation counts in the evaluation of scholars, such as high correlations between author rankings by first-author citation counts and other citation
counting methods, and high costs of using more realistic citation counting methods that are not well-supported by the ISI databases. It is argued that increasingly available digital full text research papers make it possible for citation analysis studies to go beyond what the ISI databases have directly supported and to employ more
sophisticated methods
Normative values for the hypoparathyroidism patient questionnaire (HPQ28) in the German general population
No full textAbstract Background Patients with hypoparathyroidism (HypoPT) suffer from several complaints and reduced quality of life (QoL), even if disease-specific biochemical parameters are within the target range. To be able to quantify symptoms in HypoPT patients, we recently developed a disease-specific questionnaire, the Hypoparathyroidism Patient Questionnaire with 28 items (HPQ28). The aim of this study was to find normative values for the HPQ28 in the German general population. Methods We tasked an independent market and social research institute to obtain sociodemographic data and HPQ28 results from a representative sample of the German general population. The HPQ28 comprises five scales and three single items. The five scales indicate different areas of complaints: Pain and cramps (PaC) including five items, neurovegetative symptoms (NVS) including five items, loss of vitality (LoV) including six items, depression and anxiety (DaA) including five items, gastro-intestinal symptoms (GiS) including two items and two control items for depression. Three items were not attributable to any of the five scales: numbness and tingling in certain parts of the body (NT), troubled memory (TM), and racing heart (RH). Results Mean age (± standard deviation) in the representative general population sample ( n = 2506) was 49.5 ± 17.8 years, 51% were female. All scales and single items were affected by gender with women presenting significantly more complaints on every scale and single item in comparison to men ( p < 0.01, Mann-Whitney U test). In addition, all scales and single items, except for GiS, were affected by age in males and females ( p < 0.001, Spearman’s correlation). Regression analyses proved a linear trend in the different scores regarding age and gender ( p < 0.05 except for age on the GiS scale). Conclusions We present data from the first application of the HPQ28 in a representative sample of the German general population. Almost all scales and single item of the HPQ28 were dependent on age and gender, with older individuals and females presenting a higher burden of complaints. Trial registration DRKS, DRKS00027581. Registered 17th of January 2022, https//drks.de/search/de/trial/DRKS00027581.Open-Access-Publikationsfonds 202
koamabayili/VECTRON-author-checklist: VECTRON author checklist
No full textWe have done our best to complete the author checklist relating to the use of animals in the hut study. Note that the objective for the hut study was to evaluate the IRS treatment applications for residual efficacy against Anopheles mosquitoes, including the local An. coluzzii mosquito population. Cows were only used to attract mosquitoes into the huts and no tests were carried out directly on the cows. The author checklist is intended for use with studies where experiments are carried out on animals, which is why we have had such difficulty in completing this for the hut study, as many of the questions do not relate to how the cows were used
- …
