322,934 research outputs found
Concept learning challenged
No full textIn my thesis, I argue that the philosophical and psychological study of concept-learning
mechanisms has failed to take the diversity of learning mechanisms into account, and
that consequently researchers should embrace a new way of thinking about concept
learning: `concept learning' as a class of psychological mechanisms is not a natural kind
lending itself to unified study and should be eliminated. To arrive at this, I discuss
several concept-learning models that attempt to overcome Jerry Fodor's challenge and
base my judgement on the plurality of feasible concept-learning mechanisms and on
criteria for theoretical notions from the philosophy of science.
Chapter 1 serves as an introduction to the topic `concept learning' and highlights
its importance as a research topic in the study of the mind. I argue that a mechanistic
understanding of the shape of concept learning is best suited to explain the phenomena,
in line with the recent resurgence of mechanism-based explanation in the philosophy of
mind. As the main challenge to the idea that concepts can be learnt, I proceed to set
up Fodor's challenge for concept learning in Chapter 2. This challenge is the idea that
concepts cannot be learnt given the logically possible mechanisms of concept learning. I
lay out the argumentative structure and background assumptions that support Fodor's
argument, and propose to scrutinise his empirically based premise most closely in my
thesis: this empirically based premise is that the only possible mechanism of concept
learning is the process of forming and testing hypotheses.
As replies to Fodor's challenge, I discuss Perceptual Learning (R. Goldstone), Perceptual
Meaning Analysis (J. Mandler), Quinean Bootstrapping (S. Carey), pattern-governed
learning (W. Sellars), joint-attentional learning (M. Tomasello), and the
Syndrome-Based Sustaining Mechanism Model (E. Margolis and S. Laurence). I argue
that almost every mechanism I discuss has some leverage against Fodors argument,
suggesting that there may be a wide variety of non-hypothesis-based concept-learning
mechanisms.
The final chapter of my thesis, Chapter 7, takes a step back and reviews the fate
of the notion of concept learning in light of the diverse set of learning mechanisms
brought up in my thesis. My first and main worry is that it is questionable whether the
previously discussed mechanisms of concept learning share many scientifically relevant
properties that would justify seeing them as instances of the natural kind 'concept
learning mechanism'. I argue that the substantiation of this worry would necessitate
the elimination of 'concept learning' and 'concept-learning mechanism' as terms of the
cognitive sciences. The chapter lays out the argumentative structure on which Concept
Learning Eliminativism (CLE) rests, along with a discussion of questions about natural
kinds and pragmatics in theory construction. This is inspired by Edouard Machery's
argument for the elimination of 'concept', but independent of Machery's own project.
With this in place, I go on to give a conclusive argument that supports CLE, based on
the claims that 'concept learning' is not a natural kind and that there are pragmatic
advantages to eliminating 'concept learning'. In this final chapter, I also raise pragmatic
considerations that support the argument for CLE, and propose new research directions
that could pro t from the eliminativist position
Diffusive author(s), cohesive author: Analysis of S/N (1994)
No full textThis study indicates the ways in which various aspects of the author(s) are brought forth in Dumb type’s performance art, the S/N production. Previous research has suggested a non-hierarchical organization of Dumb type and the absence of a “privileged author” in Dumb type’s collaborative work, S/N. However, the results that I have investigated from member’s interviews on the creative process of S/N along with my analysis of the recorded images of S/N, indicate a different aspect of the author(s). First, S/N was created through, so to speak, the collective ideas of the members of Dumb type. Further, S/N has at least nine quotations from previous performances, installations, and printed writings, besides the work-in-progress technique. Explicating one of the “author functions” as given by Michel Foucault, each text has plural subjects of the author. However, it has been revealed from members’ interviews that Teiji Furuhashi had a decision-making role in selecting the members’ ideas within the performance. Since then, S/N has had plural subjects of creation; however, Furuhashi is one of the subjects of creation along with the “privileged author.” S/N has plural authors (diffusive authors) yet at the same time, it has a “privileged author,” Teiji Furuhashi (cohesive author)
Going Beyond Counting First Authors in Author Co-citation Analysis
No full textThe present study examines one of the fundamental aspects of author co-citation analysis (ACA) - the way co-citation
counts are defined. Co-citation counting provides the data on which all subsequent statistical analyses and mappings
are based, and we compare ACA results based on two different types of co-citation counting - the traditional type that
only counts the first one among a cited work's authors on the one hand and a non-traditional type that takes into
account the first 5 authors of a cited work on the other hand. Results indicate that the picture produced through this non-traditional author co-citation counting contains more coherent author groups and is therefore considerably clearer. However, this picture represents fewer specialties in the research field being studied than that produced through the traditional first-author co-citation counting when the same number of top-ranked authors is selected and analyzed. Reasons for these effects are discussed
Identification and regionalization of dominant runoff processes – a GIS-based and a statistical approach
No full textIn this study two approaches are presented to identify Dominant Runoff Processes (DRP) with respect to regionalization. The approaches are a simplification of an existing method to determine DRP by means of an extensive field campaign. The first approach combines the permeability of the substratum, land-use and slope of the basin in a GIS-based analysis. The second approach makes use of discriminant analysis of the physiographic characteristics of the basin and links it to the GIS analysis. The results of the developed approaches are maps, which identify dominant runoff processes and represent a spatial distribution of the hydrological behaviour of the soil during prolonged rainfall events. The approaches have been developed in a micro-scale basin (Germany). An additional meso-scale basin was introduced in which the two approaches were applied for quality control. The thus generated maps for the micro-scale basin were compared with an existing DRP map, which was derived with the existing method. The first approach showed a resemblance of 79% when compared to this map, whereas the second approach showed only a resemblance of 51%. The generated maps for the meso-scale basin were compared to DRP that were determined point wise according to the existing method. The first approach showed in this case a resemblance of 81%, whereas the second approach showed a resemblance of 68%. Therefore, the first approach is preferred to the second approach when accuracy, data input and calculation time are concerned.WatermanagementCivil Engineering and Geoscience
Dispelling the Myths Behind First-author Citation Counts
No full textWe conducted a full-scale evaluative citation analysis study of scholars in the XML research field to explore just how different from each other author rankings resulting from different citation counting methods actually are, and to demonstrate the capability of emerging data and tools on the Web in supporting more realistic citation counting methods. Our results contest some common arguments for the continued
use of first-author citation counts in the evaluation of scholars, such as high correlations between author rankings by first-author citation counts and other citation
counting methods, and high costs of using more realistic citation counting methods that are not well-supported by the ISI databases. It is argued that increasingly available digital full text research papers make it possible for citation analysis studies to go beyond what the ISI databases have directly supported and to employ more
sophisticated methods
Author's address:
No full textCan archives of audiovisual TV interviews be used to make authors more visible to students, and thereby reduce the learning gap between native and non-native language speakers in college classes? We examined students in a college course who learned about one scholar's ideas through watching an audiovisual TV interview (i.e., visible author format) and about another scholar's ideas through reading a formal text description (i.e., invisible author format). For the invisible author, native language speakers scored significantly higher than the non-native language speakers on a corresponding exam question (i.e., a cognitive measure), generated more words on the exam question (i.e., a motivational measure), and mentioned the author's name more often in answering the exam question (i.e., an affective measure). For the visible author, the groups did not differ on any of these measures. These findings provide evidence for the idea that making the author visible through audiovisual TV interviews can eliminate the learning gap between native and non-native language speakers. 3 Universities around the world serve students who are non-native speakers of th
The vanishing author in computer-generated works: a critical analysis of recent Australian case law
No full textAbstract
The use of software is ubiquitous in the creation of many copyright works, yet the requirement in copyright law that every work have a human author who engages in independent intellectual effort means that its use may prevent copyright subsistence. Several recent Australian cases have refocused attention on authorship as an essential criterion of copyright subsistence, and these cases suggest that much computer-produced output may be authorless and thus lack copyright protection. This article, the first in a two-part series, analyses how each case deals with the question of authorship of computer-produced works and why the use of software diminishes copyright protection for a significant number of computer-generated works. The article critiques the application of conventional notions of human authorship developed in the pre-computer age to modern productions and suggests alternative approaches to authorship that satisfy both the major objectives of copyright policy and the need to adapt to the computer age. The article argues that, without a broader judicial approach to authorship of computer-generated works, Parliament must remedy the lacuna in protection for these ‘authorless’ works. Possible solutions for reform are suggested. In a forthcoming article, the author comprehensively examines those reform proposals
The construction of Karen Karnak: The multi-author-function
No full textThis thesis is situated within the comparatively recent developments of Web 2.0 and the emergence of interactive WikiMedia, and explores the mode of authorship within a Read/Write culture compared to that of a Read/Only tradition. The hypothesis of this study is that the role of the audience has become merged with the author, and as such, represents new functions and attributes, distinct from a more conventional concept of authorship, in which the roles of audience and author are more separate. Read/Write and participatory culture, as defined by this study, is focused on collaboration, and includes the influences of D.I.Y. culture, Open-Source practices and the production of text by multiple authors. Multi-authorship presents a re-thinking of several concepts which support the notion of the individual author, since the focus of multi-authorship is not on attribution and ownership of a finished text, but on the continued malleability of a text. Modes of multi-authorship, demonstrated in the use of the pseudonyms Alan Smithee and Karen Eliot, represent declarative authors whose names signify multiple origins, whilst concurrently indicating a distinct body of work. The function of these names form an important context to this study, since primary research involves the construction of an experimental mode of multi-authorship utilising WikiMedia technology and the interaction of thirty nine participants, who are invited to create a body of work under the collective pseudonym Karen Karnak. The data generated by this experiment is analysed using aspects of Michel Foucault's author-function to identify and determine power structures inherent in the WikiMedia context. The interplay of power structures, including concepts such as identity, ownership and the body of work, affect the resulting mode of authorship and contribute to the construction of Karen Karnak, suggesting further areas of research into the emerging multi-author
- …
